IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2014v5p159-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

U.S. chemical policy under review: how much Europeanisation

Author

Listed:
  • Ondřej FILIPEC

    (Faculty of Law, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The European Union chemical regulation REACH entered into force in 2007. The most ambitious regulations on chemicals in the World will soon become a source of inspiration for other countries to review their own national regulations on chemicals. This is also the case of the USA where the failure of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 to provide a high level of protection for human health and environment contributed to a general consensus for reform. Several reform proposals were considered and discussed in both chambers of Congress, reflecting to various degrees some principles of the European REACH. This article deals with the US chemical policy reform in the context of the European experience with REACH, assessing whether the US chemical policy review is subject to Europeanisation or whether the influence of REACH on the US reform is merely superficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Ondřej FILIPEC, 2014. "U.S. chemical policy under review: how much Europeanisation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 159-180, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2014:v:5:p:159-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2014_0502_FIL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Selin, 2007. "Coalition Politics and Chemicals Management in a Regulatory Ambitious Europe," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 7(3), pages 63-93, August.
    2. Robert Ladrech, 1994. "Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 69-88, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Kyris, 2013. "Europeanization beyond Contested Statehood: The European Union and Turkish-Cypriot Civil Society," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 866-883, September.
    2. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    3. JÄ nis KAPUSTÄ€NS, 2022. "Effectiveness of the European Union grants to civil society in the Baltic states: an evaluation of the EU program 'Europe for Citizens' (2007-2020)," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 99-119, October.
    4. Justin Greenwood & Christilla Roederer‐Rynning, 2015. "The “Europeanization” of the Basel process: Financial harmonization between globalization and parliamentarization," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 325-338, December.
    5. Mark Aspinwall, 2009. "NAFTA-ization: Regionalization and Domestic Political Adjustment in the North American Economic Area," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 1-24, January.
    6. Maria RAMMATA, 2017. "Public Administration And Global Governance: From National To International Competency Frameworks," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(3), pages 45-61, September.
    7. Mathieu Rousselin, 2012. "The EU as a Multilateral Rule Exporter - The Global Transfer of European Rules via International Organizations," KFG Working Papers p0048, Free University Berlin.
    8. Joanna Dreger & Aimé Heene, 2013. "European Integration and Europeanisation: Benefits and Disadvantages for Business," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 29, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    9. Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen & Oliver Foss Hessner Hansen & Nikoline Bang Oturai & Kristian Syberg & Steffen Foss Hansen, 2020. "Stakeholder analysis with regard to a recent European restriction proposal on microplastics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, June.
    10. David M Willumsen, 2018. "The Council’s REACH? National governments’ influence in the European Parliament," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 663-683, December.
    11. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Post-Print hal-01019642, HAL.
    12. Merethe Dotterud Leiren & Kacper Szulecki & Tim Rayner & Catherine Banet, 2019. "Energy Security Concerns versus Market Harmony: The Europeanisation of Capacity Mechanisms," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 92-104.
    13. George Christou & George Kyris, 2017. "The Impact of the Eurozone Crisis on National Foreign Policy: Enhancing Europeanization in the Case of Cyprus-super-," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1290-1305, November.
    14. Jessica Coria & Erik Kristiansson & Mikael Gustavsson, 2022. "Economic interests cloud hazard reductions in the European regulation of substances of very high concern," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Constantin SCHIFIRNET, 2013. "The Intellectual’s State in the Context of the Romanian Society’s Europeanization," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 1(2), pages 293-315, August.
    16. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ian Manners & Richard Whitman, 2016. "Another Theory is Possible: Dissident Voices in Theorising Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 3-18, January.
    18. Vink, Maarten P., 2002. "Negative and Positive Integration in European Immigration Policies," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 6, August.
    19. Sascha Zirra, 2010. "The Bounded Creativity of Domestic Appropriation Explaining Selective Flexicurity in Continental Countries," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 2, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    20. Krzysztof Wach & Agnieszka Głodowska & Marek Maciejewski & Marek Sieja, 2021. "Europeanization Processes of the EU Energy Policy in Visegrad Countries in the Years 2005–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    21. Radealli, Claudio M., 2000. "Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 4, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2014:v:5:p:159-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.