This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Tax Policies and Residential Mobility

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mark Hoven Stohs () (Department of Finance, College of Business and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA)
Paul Childs () (Department of Finance, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0034, USA)
Simon Stevenson () (Department of Banking and Finance, Graduate School of Business, University College Dublin, Blackrock, County Dublin, Ireland)
Abstract

Governmental tax policies have direct consequences for public spending and the distribution of wealth among a country’s population. But unintended consequences may also occur as a result of the design of those policies. We illustrate the potential impact of such unintended consequences by analyzing differences in home ownership mobility in California, Illinois, and Massachusetts that appear to result from the distinct differences in the design of real estate tax polices across these states. California’s Proposition 13, which became law in 1978, limits the increase in real estate taxes to a maximum of 2% in any given year regardless of home value appreciation. With home value appreciation, Proposition 13 creates sizeable disincentives to move. The evidence from an analysis of single family home sales records in California, Illinois, and Massachusetts indicates that California’s homeowners are significantly less mobile than their counterparts in Illinois and Massachusetts. The lower mobility was clearly not intended by the passage of Proposition 13, though its impact on society is potentially very significant. We recommend that countries in the process of developing tax systems for residential real estate ownership (such as China, the countries of the former USSR, and many countries in Africa) take account of such originally unintended consequences.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.umac.mo/fba/irer/papers/past/vol4_pdf/095-117US21.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Asian Real Estate Society in its journal International Real Estate Review.

Volume (Year): 4 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 95-117
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ire:issued:v:04:n:01:2001:p:95-117

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Asia Real Estate Society, 51 Monroe Street, Plaza E-6, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Email:
Web page: http://www.asres.org/

Order Information:
Postal: Asian Real Estate Society, 51 Monroe Street, Plaza E-6, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Email:
Web: http://www.asres.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (IRER Graduate Assistant/Webmaster).

Related research
Keywords: California; Real Estate Tax; Residential Mobility; Unintended effect;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
L85 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Real Estate Services

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Nada Wasi & Michelle J. White, 2005. "Property Tax Limitations and Mobility: The Lock-in Effect of California's Proposition 13," NBER Working Papers 11108, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. John Deskins & William Fox, 2008. "Measuring Behavioral Responses to the Property Tax," International Studies Program Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0816, International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.