IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inp/inpana/v1y2011i1p31-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fecundidad en el Ecuador y su relación con el entorno social y evolutivo

Author

Listed:
  • Cintya Lanchimba

    (Unidad de Análisis de la Información Estadística, Subdirección General, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, Quito, Ecuador)

  • Paúl Medina

    (Instituto Gregorio Millán, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, España
    Departamento de Ciencias Exactas, Escuela Politécnica del Ejército, Quito, Ecuador)

Abstract

Este documento analiza la evolución de la fecundidad en Ecuador desde el año 1990 al año 2007, período en el cual se dispone de datos reales. Luego, en base a la evolución (tendencia) detectada se pretende inferir el comportamiento de la fecundidad a corto y mediano plazo, para lo cual se utilizan las Estadísticas Vitales desde el año 1990 hasta el año 2007, la Encuesta de Empleo y Desempleo (ENEMDU) en el mismo período y los Censos de Población y Vivienda de 1990 y 2001. Los resultados muestran una tendencia decreciente de la tasa de fecundidad en el país, Esta tasa es explicada por la población femenina en edad fecunda, la población total y la tasa de natalidad. Además, se estudia el bono demográfico para el Ecuador, pues conocerlo permitirá que el gobierno tome las medidas adecuadas para su aprovechamiento. Finalmente, del estudio se desprende que el bono demográfico se encontrará situado entre el año 2013 y el año 2022.

Suggested Citation

  • Cintya Lanchimba & Paúl Medina, 2011. "Fecundidad en el Ecuador y su relación con el entorno social y evolutivo," Analítika, Analítika - Revista de Análisis Estadístico/Journal of Statistical Analysis, vol. 1(1), pages 31-55, Junio.
  • Handle: RePEc:inp:inpana:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:31-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.numericaiid.com/pdf/vol1/ANAJun2011_31_55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.numericaiid.com/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 141-145, 01-02.
    2. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 749-754, 07-08.
    3. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1132-1136, 11-12.
    4. Di Cesare, Mariachiara, 2007. "Interacciones entre transición demográfica y epidemiológica en Nicaragua: implicancias para las políticas públicas en salud," Población y Desarrollo 7220, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 535-540, 05-06.
    6. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 943-947, 09-10.
    7. anonymous, 2008. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 308-311, 03-04.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Antamba & Paúl Medina, 2014. "Movilidad endógena y variaciones demográficas: una aplicación para Ecuador," Analítika, Analítika - Revista de Análisis Estadístico/Journal of Statistical Analysis, vol. 7(1), pages 51-71, Junio.
    2. Yannira Chávez & Paúl Medina, 2012. "Estructura ocupacional y bono demográfico en el Ecuador," Analítika, Analítika - Revista de Análisis Estadístico/Journal of Statistical Analysis, vol. 3(1), pages 63-69, Junio.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yannira Chávez & Paúl Medina, 2012. "Estructura ocupacional y bono demográfico en el Ecuador," Analítika, Analítika - Revista de Análisis Estadístico/Journal of Statistical Analysis, vol. 3(1), pages 63-69, Junio.
    2. Yabibal Mulualem Walle, 2010. "Tourist Flows and its Determinants in Ethiopia," Working Papers 001, Policy Studies Institute.
    3. Camille Kandiko Howson & Alex Buckley, 2020. "Quantifying Learning: Measuring Student Outcomes in Higher Education in England," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 6-14.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q4h0h8h is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q4h0h8h is not listed on IDEAS
    6. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2016. "Matters of visuality in legitimation practices: Dual iconographies in a meeting room," Post-Print hal-01767067, HAL.
    7. Anne Isabel Kraus & Owen Frazer & Lars Kirchhoff & Tatiana Kyselova & Simon J. A. Mason & Julia Palmiano Federer, 2019. "Dilemmas and Trade-Offs in Peacemaking: A Framework for Navigating Difficult Decisions," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 331-342.
    8. Shigeru Fujita & Hermann Gartner, 2014. "A closer look at the German labor market 'miracle'," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q4, pages 16-24.
    9. Kadriu, Arbana & Haliti, Nusret, 2018. "A Business Perspective on Internet of Things," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2018), Split, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Split, Croatia, 6-8 September 2018, pages 1-6, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    10. Patrick Messerlin, 2009. "Too early to cry wolf," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqi, Sciences Po.
    11. Katja Mielke & Helena Cermeño, 2021. "Mitigating Pro-Poor Housing Failures: Access Theory and the Politics of Urban Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 439-450.
    12. Kuo‐Chang Huang & Kong‐Pin Chen & Chang‐Ching Lin, 2010. "An Empirical Investigation of Settlement and Litigation—The Case of Taiwanese Labor Disputes," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 786-810, December.
    13. Chiara Certomà & Mark Dyer & Antonella Passani, 2020. "The City of Digital Social Innovators," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1-7.
    14. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q4h0h8h is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tasa de fecundidad; bono demógrafico;

    JEL classification:

    • B54 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Feminist Economics
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inp:inpana:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:31-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.numericaiid.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.