IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v17y2006i2p239-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating Hazards Through Continuing Design: The Birth and Evolution of a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Madsen

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 545 Student Services 1900, Berkeley, California 94720-1900)

  • Vinit Desai

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 545 Student Services 1900, Berkeley, California 94720-1900)

  • Karlene Roberts

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 545 Student Services 1900, Berkeley, California 94720-1900)

  • Daniel Wong

    (6400 Christie Avenue №3413, Emeryville, California 94608)

Abstract

Often, researchers study organizations in which design is largely in place and the design process is shrouded in the distant past. However, the design process can have dramatic implications for how organizations function. This paper reports a specific attempt to design one organizational subunit, a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), to function under difficult circumstances. The founders aimed to create a highly reliable and safe unit, but implementing their vision required continuous effort. The unit needed constant buffering from external pressures and a dissimilar parent organization, and these forces shaped the unit’s ultimate design. Through the presentation of this case, we discuss the impact of design on the organization, its members, and the larger hospital organization to which the unit belonged. The study reveals that the PICU’s design was an ongoing effort and its most stable component was a vision of distributed knowledge and decentralized intensive care. We conclude by discussing implications of the case for organizational design theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Madsen & Vinit Desai & Karlene Roberts & Daniel Wong, 2006. "Mitigating Hazards Through Continuing Design: The Birth and Evolution of a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 239-248, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:239-248
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0185
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1060.0185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March & Lee S. Sproull & Michal Tamuz, 1991. "Learning from Samples of One or Fewer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Karlene H. Roberts, 1990. "Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 160-176, May.
    3. Karlene H. Roberts & Suzanne K. Stout & Jennifer J. Halpern, 1994. "Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 614-624, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang & Yu-Hsien Lin, 2014. "Green Transformational Leadership and Green Performance: The Mediation Effects of Green Mindfulness and Green Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Camille M. de Bovis & Christophe Baret & Jocelyne Ientile-Yalenios, 2011. "Les hôpitaux sont-ils des " organisations à haute fiabilité " ? Apports du concept de " HRO " à la GRH des personnels soignants," Post-Print halshs-00670877, HAL.
    3. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang & Shu-Ling Yeh & Hsin-I Cheng, 2015. "Green shared vision and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1169-1184, May.
    4. Geoffrey Leuridan, 2020. "Bridging the gap between culture and safety in a critical care context: The role of work debate spaces," Post-Print hal-03577454, HAL.
    5. Gerardo Patriotta & Daniel A. Gruber, 2015. "Newsmaking and Sensemaking: Navigating Temporal Transitions Between Planned and Unexpected Events," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1574-1592, December.
    6. Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain & Santoro, Gabriele & Khan, Jabran & Rizzato, Fabio, 2021. "Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation in the IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 389-400.
    7. Dvora Yanow & Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "What is Reflection‐In‐Action? A Phenomenological Account," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1339-1364, December.
    8. Sandra Bertezene & David Vallat & Philippe Michel & Jacques Martin, 2023. "Deciding in turmoil: Four University Hospital Centres in the Covid-19," Post-Print hal-04212906, HAL.
    9. Li, Huanli & Wu, Yun & Cao, Dongmei & Wang, Yichuan, 2021. "Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 700-712.
    10. Agnès Festré & Pierre Garrouste, 2012. "The ‘Economics of Attention’: A New Avenue of Research in Cognitive Economics," GREDEG Working Papers 2012-12, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    11. Claus Rerup, 2009. "Attentional Triangulation: Learning from Unexpected Rare Crises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 876-893, October.
    12. Georg Schreyögg & Jörg Sydow, 2010. "CROSSROADS---Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1251-1262, December.
    13. Geoffrey Leuridan & Benoît Demil, 2017. "Ensuring resilience in a Critical Care Unit: a dynamic approach of slacking processes [Maintenir la fiabilité en situation extrême : une approche dynamique du slack organisationnel]," Post-Print hal-02860996, HAL.
    14. Singh, Shiwangi & Sharma, Meenakshi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2021. "Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Geoffrey Leuridan & Benoît Demil, 2022. "Exploring the dynamics of slack in extreme contexts," Post-Print hal-03931024, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banerjee, Preeta M. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "Organization at the Limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster," Working Papers 07-0101, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    2. Zhiang (John) Lin & Xia Zhao & Kiran M. Ismail & Kathleen M. Carley, 2006. "Organizational Design and Restructuring in Response to Crises: Lessons from Computational Modeling and Real-World Cases," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(5), pages 598-618, October.
    3. Anke Müssig, 2009. "The Financial Crisis: Caused by Unpreventable or Organized Failures?," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 2(1), pages 51-70, June.
    4. Vincent Giolito, 2015. "Managing organizational errors: Three theoretical lenses on a bank collapse," Working Papers CEB 15-033, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. J. S. Busby & A. M. Collins, 2014. "Organizational Sensemaking About Risk Controls: The Case of Offshore Hydrocarbons Production," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1738-1752, September.
    6. Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano & David P. McCaffrey & Rogelio Oliva, 2014. "Drift and Adjustment in Organizational Rule Compliance: Explaining the “Regulatory Pendulum” in Financial Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 321-338, April.
    7. Peter M. Madsen, 2009. "These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 861-875, October.
    8. T. Anderson & J. S. Busby & M. Rouncefield, 2020. "Understanding the Ecological Validity of Relying Practice as a Basis for Risk Identification," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1383-1398, July.
    9. Léna Masson & Julienne Brabet, 2018. "The paradoxes of externalization strategy in a safety critical industry," Post-Print hal-01765294, HAL.
    10. Carroll, John S., 1948-, 1997. "Organizational learning activities in high hazard industries : the logics underlying self-analysis," Working papers WP 3936-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    11. Rudolph, Jenny & Hatakenaka, Sachi & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice," Working papers 4359-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. Johannessen, Idar A. & McArthur, Philip W. & Jonassen, Jan R., 2015. "Informal leadership redundancy: Balancing structure and flexibility in subsea operations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 409-423.
    13. Sandra Bertezene & David Vallat & Philippe Michel & Jacques Martin, 2023. "Deciding in turmoil: Four University Hospital Centres in the Covid-19," Post-Print hal-04212906, HAL.
    14. Maurizio Zollo, 1998. "Strategies or Routines ? Knowledge Codification, Path-Dependence and the Evolution of Post-Acquisition Integration Practices in the U.S. Banking Industry," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-10, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    15. Michel Anteby & Curtis K. Chan, 2018. "A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 247-263, April.
    16. Daniela P. Blettner & Zi-Lin He & Songcui Hu & Richard A. Bettis, 2015. "Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 987-1005, July.
    17. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    18. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2009. "Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 909-924, October.
    19. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.
    20. Peter Madsen & Robin L. Dillon & Catherine H. Tinsley, 2016. "Airline Safety Improvement Through Experience with Near‐Misses: A Cautionary Tale," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 1054-1066, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:239-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.