IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v59y2011i5p1171-1183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating Customers According to Their Promptness to Adopt New Products

Author

Listed:
  • Dorit S. Hochbaum

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Erick Moreno-Centeno

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845)

  • Phillip Yelland

    (Google Inc., Mountain View, California 94043)

  • Rodolfo A. Catena

    (The SPHERE Institute, Burlingame, California 94010)

Abstract

Databases are a significant source of information in organizations and play a major role in managerial decision-making. This study considers how to process commercial data on customer purchasing timing to provide insights on the rate of new product adoption by the company's consumers. Specifically, we show how to use the separation-deviation model (SD-model) to rate customers according to their proclivity for adopting products for a given line of high-tech products. We provide a novel interpretation of the SD-model as a unidimensional scaling technique and show that, in this context, it outperforms several dimension-reduction and scaling techniques. We analyze the results with respect to various dimensions of the customer base and report on the generated insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorit S. Hochbaum & Erick Moreno-Centeno & Phillip Yelland & Rodolfo A. Catena, 2011. "Rating Customers According to Their Promptness to Adopt New Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1171-1183, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:5:p:1171-1183
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1110.0963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0963
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1110.0963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry L. Bayus, 1998. "An Analysis of Product Lifetimes in a Technologically Dynamic Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 763-775, June.
    2. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Dorit S. Hochbaum & James B. Orlin, 2003. "Solving the Convex Cost Integer Dual Network Flow Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 950-964, July.
    3. Dorit S. Hochbaum, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Selection, Provisioning, Shared Fixed Costs, Maximum Closure, and Implications on Algorithmic Methods Today," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 709-723, June.
    4. Warren Torgerson, 1952. "Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(4), pages 401-419, December.
    5. Michael Brusco & Stephanie Stahl, 2005. "Optimal Least-Squares Unidimensional Scaling: Improved Branch-and-Bound Procedures and Comparison to Dynamic Programming," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 253-270, June.
    6. P. J. F. Groenen & W. J. Heiser & J. J. Meulman, 1999. "Global Optimization in Least-Squares Multidimensional Scaling by Distance Smoothing," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 16(2), pages 225-254, July.
    7. Dorit S. Hochbaum & Asaf Levin, 2006. "Methodologies and Algorithms for Group-Rankings Decision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1394-1408, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. TANASE, George, 2016. "The Future of Marketing in 2016: Trends in the New Digital Age," Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine, Romanian Distribution Committee, vol. 7(2), pages 20-25, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Brusco & Hans-Friedrich Köhn & Stephanie Stahl, 2008. "Heuristic Implementation of Dynamic Programming for Matrix Permutation Problems in Combinatorial Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 503-522, September.
    2. Alexander Strehl & Joydeep Ghosh, 2003. "Relationship-Based Clustering and Visualization for High-Dimensional Data Mining," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 208-230, May.
    3. Nathan Atkinson & Scott C. Ganz & Dorit S. Hochbaum & James B. Orlin, 2023. "The Strong Maximum Circulation Algorithm: A New Method for Aggregating Preference Rankings," Papers 2307.15702, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    4. Susanne Meyer & Javier Revilla Diez, 2015. "One country, two systems: How regional institutions shape governance modes in the greater Pearl River Delta, China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 891-900, November.
    5. Mô José Moral & Jordi Jaumandreu, "undated". "Automobile demand, model cycle and price effects," Studies on the Spanish Economy 64, FEDEA.
    6. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    7. Oscar Claveria & Enric Monte & Salvador Torra, 2017. "A new approach for the quantification of qualitative measures of economic expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2685-2706, November.
    8. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Izabela Horzela & Sławomir Gromadzki & Jarosław Gryz & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Radosław Wisniewski, 2021. "Energy Portfolio of the Eastern Poland Macroregion in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Kivi, Antero & Smura, Timo & Töyli, Juuso, 2012. "Technology product evolution and the diffusion of new product features," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 107-126.
    12. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    13. Jinkai Yu & Wenjing Bi, 2019. "Evolution of Marine Environmental Governance Policy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Michael J. Brusco & Douglas Steinley & Ashley L. Watts, 2022. "Disentangling relationships in symptom networks using matrix permutation methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 133-155, March.
    15. Barry L. Bayus & Rajshree Agarwal, 2007. "The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1887-1902, December.
    16. Rahul Kapoor & Ron Adner, 2012. "What Firms Make vs. What They Know: How Firms' Production and Knowledge Boundaries Affect Competitive Advantage in the Face of Technological Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1227-1248, October.
    17. Walesiak Marek & Dudek Andrzej, 2017. "Selecting the Optimal Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for Metric Data With R Environment," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(3), pages 521-540, September.
    18. Mirta Galesic & A. Walkyria Goode & Thomas S. Wallsten & Kent L. Norman, 2018. "Using Tversky’s contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(2), pages 163-169, March.
    19. Lewis, R.M. & Trosset, M.W., 2006. "Sensitivity analysis of the strain criterion for multidimensional scaling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 135-153, January.
    20. Roemer, Thomas A. & Ahmadi, Reza, 2010. "Models for concurrent product and process design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 601-613, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:5:p:1171-1183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.