IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v36y1988i6p904-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Descriptive Analysis for Computer-Based Decision Support

Author

Listed:
  • Mark S. Silver

    (University of California, Los Angeles, California)

Abstract

This article studies the issue of descriptive analysis for Decision Support Systems (DSS). Much of the DSS research literature concentrates on the procedural aspects of building support systems rather than on the substantive issues of their content. If we are to expand our knowledge of DSS, however, it is important to complement our understanding of the process of their development with a means for describing and differentiating DSS. In particular, a descriptive mechanism should pay careful attention to those features of DSS that determine the effects a support system has on the decision making processes of its users. A three-tiered approach to describing DSS is proposed, consisting of the following sequence of analytical levels: functional capabilities, user views of system components, and system attributes (restrictiveness, guidance, and focus). Moving from the first through the third tiers, increasing attention is paid to examining DSS in their entirety and to considering their effects on decision making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark S. Silver, 1988. "Descriptive Analysis for Computer-Based Decision Support," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 904-916, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:36:y:1988:i:6:p:904-916
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.36.6.904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.6.904
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.36.6.904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clayton Arlen Looney & Andrew M. Hardin, 2009. "Decision Support for Retirement Portfolio Management: Overcoming Myopic Loss Aversion via Technology Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1688-1703, October.
    2. Vetschera, Rudolf & Walterscheid, Heinz, 1993. "A process-oriented framework for the evaluation of managerial support systems," Discussion Papers, Series I 264, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    3. Seow, Poh-Sun, 2011. "The effects of decision aid structural restrictiveness on decision-making outcomes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 40-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:36:y:1988:i:6:p:904-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.