IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v20y2018i4p721-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating Work Breaks from Available Idleness

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Sun

    (Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • Ward Whitt

    (Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

Abstract

We develop new rules for assigning available service representatives to customers in customer contact centers and other large-scale service systems in order to create effective work breaks for the service representatives from naturally available idleness. These are unplanned breaks occurring randomly over time. We consider both announced breaks as well as unannounced breaks. Our goal is to make the mean and variance of the interval between successive breaks suitably small. Given a target break duration, we propose assigning idle servers based on the elapsed time since their last break. We show that our proposed server-assignment rules are optimal for the many-server heavy-traffic (MSHT) fluid model. Extensive simulation experiments support the proposed server-assignment rules in practical cases and confirm the MSHT approximation formulas when the number of servers is very large.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Sun & Ward Whitt, 2018. "Creating Work Breaks from Available Idleness," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 721-736, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:721-736
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2017.0682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0682
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2017.0682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Jackson, 1957. "Networks of Waiting Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 518-521, August.
    2. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    3. Ward Whitt, 1989. "Planning Queueing Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(11), pages 1341-1366, November.
    4. Wyean Chan & Ger Koole & Pierre L'Ecuyer, 2014. "Dynamic Call Center Routing Policies Using Call Waiting and Agent Idle Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 544-560, October.
    5. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović & Yulia Tseytlin, 2012. "On Fair Routing from Emergency Departments to Hospital Wards: QED Queues with Heterogeneous Servers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1273-1291, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Shuling & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 807-822.
    2. Dongyuan Zhan & Amy R. Ward, 2019. "Staffing, Routing, and Payment to Trade off Speed and Quality in Large Service Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1738-1751, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Mirela Teacu (Parincu), 2019. "Neuromanagement – the Impact of Neuroscience on the Organizational Performance," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 487-493.
    2. Ethan Ilzetzki & Saverio Simonelli, 2017. "Measuring Productivity Dispersion: Lessons From Counting One-Hundred Million Ballots," CSEF Working Papers 483, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    3. Veneklaas, W. & Leeftink, A.G. & van Boekel, P.H.C.M. & Hans, E.W., 2021. "On the design, implementation, and feasibility of hospital admission services: The admission lounge case," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    5. Gus diZerega & David F. Hardwick, 2011. "The Emergence of Vancouver as a Creative City," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Michel Anteby & Curtis K. Chan, 2018. "A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 247-263, April.
    7. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Gerald Marschke, 2010. "Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 183-208.
    8. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    9. Marinov, Marin & Şahin, İsmail & Ricci, Stefano & Vasic-Franklin, Gordana, 2013. "Railway operations, time-tabling and control," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 59-75.
    10. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    11. Jeremy Atack & Robert A. Margo & Paul Rhode, 2020. "‘Mechanization Takes Command’: Inanimate Power and Labor Productivity in Late Nineteenth Century American Manufacturing," NBER Working Papers 27436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Raphaëlle Stewart & Faheem Ali & Casper Boks & Niki Bey, 2018. "Architect, Catalyst, Advocate, and Prophet: A Four-Lens View of Companies to Support Ecodesign Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Elizabeth-Anne Thomas, 2019. "How Useful Is the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Reporting Framework to Identify the Non-financial Value of Corporate Social Performance (CSP)?," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Nicholas Capaldi & Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Martin Brueckner (ed.), Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future, pages 37-87, Springer.
    14. Gurami Tsitsiashvili, 2021. "Construction and Analysis of Queuing and Reliability Models Using Random Graphs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Jennifer Sommer & Joost Berkhout & Hans Daduna & Bernd Heidergott, 2017. "Analysis of Jackson networks with infinite supply and unreliable nodes," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 181-207, October.
    16. Song, Wheyming Tina, 1996. "On the estimation of optimal batch sizes in the analysis of simulation output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 304-319, January.
    17. Yan Jin & Raymond E. Levitt, 1993. "i‐AGENTS: Modeling Organizational Problem Solving in Multi‐Agent Teams," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 247-270, December.
    18. Roy, Kaushik & Khokle, Pradyumana, 2009. "Integrating Resource-Based and Rational Contingency Views:Understanding Design of Dynamic Capabilities of Organisations," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-02-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    19. Dave Buchanan, 1999. "Ways Ahead for Organisations: Disappointing Guidebooks," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 399-402, June.
    20. Ehsan Mehdad & Jack P.C. Kleijnen, 2018. "Stochastic intrinsic Kriging for simulation metamodeling," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 322-337, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:721-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.