IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v25y1979i7p609-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Efficient Algorithm to Determine Stochastic Dominance Admissible Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay S. Bawa

    (Bell Laboratories and New York University)

  • Eric B. Lindenberg

    (American Telephone and Telegraph Co., New York)

  • Lawrence C. Rafsky

    (ADP Network Services, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan)

Abstract

Stochastic Dominance (SD) rules are playing an increasingly prominent role in the theory of choice under uncertainty. Its application areas include stock selection, capital budgeting, etc. The theory is important because it generates decision rules which are more generally applicable to these problems than are the traditional two parameter (mean-variance) rules employed in much of financial decision making. While they are theoretically sound, the SD rules are, until now, hard to implement because they require comparisons of probability distributions over their entire ranges. In this paper, we develop an algorithm that should remedy this situation. It exploits recent theoretical results from the Stochastic Dominance literature as well as several computational techniques to efficiently determine the SD admissible set of alternatives, which contains the optimal choices for all decision makers whose preferences satisfy reasonable economic criteria. As compared with the fastest code currently available, an implementation of our algorithm significantly reduces the computational time required to solve a problem of considerable size. These results indicate that, as a management tool, this algorithm can be applied to choice problems not previously thought solvable. For example, in the portfolio choice problem, which has an infinite choice set, the algorithm can provide reasonable approximations to the true set of optimal choices via the use of a suitably fine enough grid on the space of portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijay S. Bawa & Eric B. Lindenberg & Lawrence C. Rafsky, 1979. "An Efficient Algorithm to Determine Stochastic Dominance Admissible Sets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(7), pages 609-622, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:25:y:1979:i:7:p:609-622
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.25.7.609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.7.609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.25.7.609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrey Lizyayev, 2012. "Stochastic dominance efficiency analysis of diversified portfolios: classification, comparison and refinements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 391-410, July.
    2. McCamley, Francis, 1988. "Approximating a GSD-Efficient Set of Mixtures of Risky Alternatives for Risk Averse Decision Makers," Working Papers 256651, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Raymond H. Chan & Ephraim Clark & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "New development on the third-order stochastic dominance for risk-averse and risk-seeking investors with application in risk management," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 108-132, June.
    4. Arndt, Channing & Distante, Roberta & Hussain, M. Azhar & Østerdal, Lars Peter & Huong, Pham Lan & Ibraimo, Maimuna, 2012. "Ordinal Welfare Comparisons with Multiple Discrete Indicators: A First Order Dominance Approach and Application to Child Poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(11), pages 2290-2301.
    5. Thierry Post & Milos Kopa, 2015. "Portfolio Choice based on Third-degree Stochastic Dominance, With an Application to Industry Momentum," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1527, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
    6. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Big Data, Computational Science, Economics, Finance, Marketing, Management, and Psychology: Connections," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Decision Sciences, Economics, Finance, Business, Computing, And Big Data: Connections," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 22(1), pages 36-94, December.
    8. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2016. "Management science, economics and finance: A connection," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2016-07, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    9. Chang, C-L. & McAleer, M.J. & Wong, W.-K., 2018. "Decision Sciences, Economics, Finance, Business, Computing, and Big Data: Connections," Econometric Institute Research Papers 18-024/III, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    10. Arndt, Channing & Distante, Roberta & Hussain, M. Azhar & Østerdal, Lars Peter & Huong, Pham Lan & Ibraimo, Maimuna, 2012. "Ordinal Welfare Comparisons with Multiple Discrete Indicators: A First Order Dominance Approach and Application to Child Poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(11), pages 2290-2301.
    11. Osuna, Edgar Elias, 2012. "Crossing points of distributions and a theorem that relates them to second order stochastic dominance," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 758-764.
    12. Timo Kuosmanen, 2004. "Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1390-1406, October.
    13. Chan, Raymond H. & Clark, Ephraim & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2012. "On the Third Order Stochastic Dominance for Risk-Averse and Risk-Seeking Investors," MPRA Paper 42676, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Chan, Raymond H. & Clark, Ephraim & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2016. "On the Third Order Stochastic Dominance for Risk-Averse and Risk-Seeking Investors with Analysis of their Traditional and Internet Stocks," MPRA Paper 75002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Fang, Yi & Post, Thierry, 2017. "Higher-degree stochastic dominance optimality and efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 984-993.
    16. McCamley, Francis, 1988. "Approximating A Gsd-Efficient Set Of Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives For Risk Averse Decision Makers," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270301, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Thierry Post & Miloš Kopa, 2017. "Portfolio Choice Based on Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3381-3392, October.
    18. McCamley, Francis & Kliebenstein, James B., 1985. "Describing And Identifying The Complete Set Of Stochastically Efficient Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278551, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Kolokolova, Olga & Le Courtois, Olivier & Xu, Xia, 2022. "Is the index efficient? A worldwide tour with stochastic dominance," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    20. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Big Data, Computational Science, Economics, Finance, Marketing, Management, and Psychology: Connections," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stochastic dominance; algorithm;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:25:y:1979:i:7:p:609-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.