IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v30y2000i5p34-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal OR Consulting: Effective Practice in a Changing Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Fildes

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom LA1 4YX)

  • John Ranyard

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University)

Abstract

Around 1970 some 96 percent of the largest Fortune-500 companies had established OR groups. The recessions of the '70s and '80s led many to close their groups. In 1993, the UK OR Society, disturbed by further closures, funded a study to identify factors that influenced the success and survival of internal OR groups. The study team found three categories of factors: changes in the external environment, in the organization, and in the OR group's management. This research shows that to be effective, an OR group needs good consulting skills, expert project management, active marketing of its services, and responsiveness to changes in its clients' requirements and in the surrounding organizational culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Fildes & John Ranyard, 2000. "Internal OR Consulting: Effective Practice in a Changing Environment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 34-50, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:30:y:2000:i:5:p:34-50
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.30.5.34.1638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.30.5.34.1638
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.30.5.34.1638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Rosenhead, 1996. "What's the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 117-131, December.
    2. L Abdel-Malek & C Wolf & F Johnson & T Spencer, 1999. "OR Practice: survey results and reflections of practising INFORMS members," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(10), pages 994-1003, October.
    3. Arthur M. Geoffrion, 1992. "Forces, Trends, and Opportunities in MS/OR," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 423-445, June.
    4. R Fildes & J C Ranyard & W R Crymble, 1999. "The management of OR groups: results of a survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(6), pages 563-580, June.
    5. Michael Radnor & Rodney D. Neal, 1973. "The Progress of Management-Science Activities in Large US Industrial Corporations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 427-450, April.
    6. D. A. Bradbard & F. N. Ford & J. F. Cox & W. N. Ledbetter, 1987. "The Management Science/Operations Research Industrial-Academic Interface," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 39-48, April.
    7. Ivan Gryffenberg & Jean L. Lausberg & Willem J. Smit & Stephanus Uys & Sally Botha & F. Rauten Hofmeyr & Ruppert P. Nicolay & Willie L. van der Merwe & Gysbert J. Wessels, 1997. "Guns or Butter: Decision Support for Determining the Size and Shape of the South African National Defense Force," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 7-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K Katsaliaki & N Mustafee & Y K Dwivedi & T Williams & J M Wilson, 2010. "A profile of OR research and practice published in the Journal of the Operational Research Society," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 82-94, January.
    2. M S Sodhi & B-G Son, 2010. "Content analysis of OR job advertisements to infer required skills," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(9), pages 1315-1327, September.
    3. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    4. Ranyard, J.C. & Fildes, R. & Hu, Tun-I, 2015. "Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2008. "The OR/MS Ecosystem: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 267-277, April.
    2. Maurice W. Kirby, 2007. "Paradigm Change in Operations Research: Thirty Years of Debate," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Ranyard, J.C. & Fildes, R. & Hu, Tun-I, 2015. "Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 1-13.
    4. Mingers, John & Rosenhead, Jonathan, 2004. "Problem structuring methods in action," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 530-554, February.
    5. Smith, Chris M. & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 403-416.
    6. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2021. "An Appreciation of Metaphors in Management Consulting from the Conceptual Lens of Holistic Flexibility," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 137-157, January.
    7. Wu, Yen-Chun Jim & Huang, I.C., 2007. "Operations research practice on logistics management in Taiwan: An academic view," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 428-435, October.
    8. David C. Lane, 2010. "OR FORUM---High Leverage Interventions: Three Cases of Defensive Action and Their Lessons for OR/MS Today," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1535-1547, December.
    9. Sondoss Elsawah & Elena Bakhanova & Raimo P. Hämäläinen & Alexey Voinov, 2023. "A Competency Framework for Participatory Modeling," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 569-601, June.
    10. Maurice W. Kirby, 2000. "Operations Research Trajectories: The Anglo-American Experience from the 1940s to the 1990s," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 661-670, October.
    11. T Ritchey, 2006. "Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(7), pages 792-801, July.
    12. Jack R. Meredith, 2001. "Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 325-333, June.
    13. Sanjay L. Ahire & Michael F. Gorman & David Dwiggins & Oleh Mudry, 2007. "Operations Research Helps Reshape Operations Strategy at Standard Register Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 553-565, December.
    14. William Jones & Mahesh Sooriyabandara & Mike Yearworth & Angela Doufexi & R. Eddie Wilson, 2016. "Planning For 5G: A Problem Structuring Approach for Survival in the Telecoms Industry," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 301-321, July.
    15. Konsti-Laakso, Suvi & Rantala, Tero, 2018. "Managing community engagement: A process model for urban planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1040-1049.
    16. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck & Andrej Mrvar, 2019. "The Analysis of Interconnected Decision Areas: A Computational Approach to Finding All Feasible Solutions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 543-563, June.
    17. Phi, Giang & Dredge, Dianne & Whitford, Michelle, 2014. "Understanding conflicting perspectives in event planning and management using Q method," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 406-415.
    18. F O'Brien & M Meadows, 2007. "Developing a visioning methodology: Visioning Choices for the future of operational research," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 557-575, May.
    19. Michael Yearworth & Gordon Edwards, 2014. "On the Desirability of Integrating Research Methods into Overall Systems Approaches in the Training of Engineers: Analysis Using SSM," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 47-66, January.
    20. Small, Adrian & Wainwright, David, 2018. "Privacy and security of electronic patient records – Tailoring multimethodology to explore the socio-political problems associated with Role Based Access Control systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 344-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:30:y:2000:i:5:p:34-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.