IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/intjaf/v1y2008i1p107-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital markets' reactions to social information announcements

Author

Listed:
  • Sepideh Parsa
  • Leo Xiaobing Deng

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate whether the London Stock Exchange (LSE) reacts to social information announcements by new entrants to LSE over a period of five years. Out of a total of 249 non-financial companies that joined LSE, only 66 social information items were announced by 40 companies. For each individual information item, the corresponding company's share price movements are observed and compared with the market benchmark. Having measured abnormal returns for all the price movements, it transpires that on the day of announcement 71% of the reported social information items corresponded with positive abnormal returns. Even though our findings illustrate an overall positive market response to the announcement of social information, the observation of some negative reactions indicates that the release of social information by companies may not always meet its intended target and enhance corporate reputation as perceived by investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepideh Parsa & Leo Xiaobing Deng, 2008. "Capital markets' reactions to social information announcements," International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 107-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:107-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=20239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Ma‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Fátima David, 2019. "An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 127-140, January.
    2. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    3. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Cristina‐Andrea Araújo‐Bernardo, 2020. "What colour is the corporate social responsibility report? Structural visual rhetoric, impression management strategies, and stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1117-1142, March.
    4. Aruoriwo Marian Chijoke-Mgbame & Chijoke Oscar Mgbame, 2018. "Discretionary environmental disclosures of corporations in Nigeria," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 252-261, November.
    5. Georgeta VINTILA, 2013. "A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility - Financial Performance - Firm Size," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 61(1), pages 62-67, March.
    6. Mansoora Ahmed & Sun Zehou & Syed Ali Raza & Muhammad Asif Qureshi & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2020. "Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2225-2239, September.
    7. Raquel Garde Sánchez & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar & Antonio M. López Hernández, 2017. "Corporate and managerial characteristics as drivers of social responsibility disclosure by state-owned enterprises," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 633-659, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:107-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=231 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.