IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v20y2010i1-2-3-4p242-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of hybrid-CLP vs. GA: non-permutation flowshop with constrained resequencing buffers

Author

Listed:
  • Gerrit Farber
  • Anna M. Coves Moreno
  • Said Salhi

Abstract

This paper is located in the area of mixed model non-permutation flowshop production lines where jobs of more than one model are being processed on the same production line in an arbitrary sequence. Nevertheless, the majority of publications in this area are limited to solutions which determine the job sequence before the jobs enters the line and maintains it without interchanging jobs until the end of the production line, which is known as permutation flowshop. The present work considers a non-permutation flowshop. Resequencing is permitted where stations have access to intermediate or centralised resequencing buffers. The access to the buffers is restricted by the number of available buffer places and the physical size of the products. The primary objective is the minimisation of the make span, but also setup-cost and setup-time is contemplated. A hybrid approach, using constraint logic programming (CLP), is presented and compared to a genetic algorithm (GA). These solution methods are conceptually different and recommendations for their applicability are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerrit Farber & Anna M. Coves Moreno & Said Salhi, 2010. "Performance evaluation of hybrid-CLP vs. GA: non-permutation flowshop with constrained resequencing buffers," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1/2/3/4), pages 242-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:20:y:2010:i:1/2/3/4:p:242-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32900
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rossit, Daniel Alejandro & Tohmé, Fernando & Frutos, Mariano, 2018. "The Non-Permutation Flow-Shop scheduling problem: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 143-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:20:y:2010:i:1/2/3/4:p:242-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.