Net neutrality regulation of the internet?
AbstractStrict net neutrality means that any data packet of any service should be treated strictly equal, independent of origin, destination and type of service, no matter what the economic value of congestion-free conveyance actually is. There is a broad consensus that any blocking or retardation of data packets for reasons of censorship or restraining substitutive services should be prohibited. The problem then focuses on dealing with temporary internet overload. It will be argued that the negative effect of congestion on quality varies strongly among services. If user flat rates and net neutrality come together, some quality-sensitive high value services might be crowded out by quality-insensitive low value services, which is inefficient. The optimal solution is the application of priority pricing, where higher prices are paid for higher priorities in case of overload. It will be concluded that the European approach, which relies on trusting in market forces combined with the soft regulation of adequate transparency rules and a sufficient degree of competition, will lead to an efficient outcome.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Management and Network Economics.
Volume (Year): 2 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID==259
internet regulation; net neutrality; priority pricing; quality sensitivity; quality of service; QoS; overprovisioning; two-sided markets; temporary internet overload; congestion; market forces; soft regulation; transparency rules; competition; network neutrality.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.