IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcome/v8y2018i2p159-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the validity of instruments in an exactly identified equation

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Ventura

Abstract

Whenever the number of instruments equals the number of endogenous variables testing the validity of the instruments is not a feasible task. Based on recent econometric developments (Lewbel, 2012), this paper aims at spreading among applied economists and econometricians an empirical strategy to overcome this setback, thus sidestepping the exact identification problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Ventura, 2018. "Testing the validity of instruments in an exactly identified equation," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 159-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:159-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antinyan, Armenak & Baghdasaryan, Vardan & Grigoryan, Aleksandr, 2021. "Charitable giving, social capital and positional concerns," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2021/33, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    2. Deligianni, Ioanna, 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between product and international diversification in new ventures: The moderating effect of effectuation processes," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    3. Antinyan, Armenak & Baghdasaryan, Vardan & Grigoryan, Aleksandr, 2022. "Charitable giving, social capital, and positional concerns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:159-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=311 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.