IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v9y2007i4p380-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationships between quality, innovation and business performance: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel I. Prajogo
  • Pervaiz K. Ahmed

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between product quality, product innovation and process innovation, and the relationship between these three operational performance measures and business performance in terms of sales, profitability and market share. The impetus for this study was driven by an argument that propounds quality and innovation are two elements that compete with each other, and that firms need to make a trade-off decision between them. In conjunction with this, another argument suggests that quality is increasingly being 'downgraded' into an order qualifier criteria and innovation is taking over as the order winner. Using empirical data drawn from 194 managers in Australian firms, the results indicate that there are strong and positive relationships between product quality and process innovation. Similar relationships also occur between product innovation and process innovation. However, the relationship between product quality and product innovation appears to be relatively weak, especially with respect to specific elements. Further to this, the results indicate that process innovation shows strongest relationship with business performance, followed by product innovation and product quality. At the surface level, this finding provides support for the above argument that quality is relatively inferior in its impact on business performance compared to innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel I. Prajogo & Pervaiz K. Ahmed, 2007. "The relationships between quality, innovation and business performance: an empirical study," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 380-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:9:y:2007:i:4:p:380-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=13361
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Zhen & Kemp, Ron G.M. & Jongsma, Maarten A. & Huang, Caicheng & Dons, J.J.M. & Omta, S.W.F, 2014. "Key Success Factors of Innovation Projects of Vegetable Breeding Companies in China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Bie, Xiaodong & Ciani, Andrea, 2021. "Born similar, develop apart: Evidence on Chinese hybrid exporters," DICE Discussion Papers 364, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Terziovski, Milé & Guerrero, Jose-Luis, 2014. "ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 197-207.
    4. Hallin, Christina & Holm, Ulf & Sharma, Dharma Deo, 2011. "Embeddedness of innovation receivers in the multinational corporation: Effects on business performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 362-373, June.
    5. Arana-Solares, Iván Andrés & Ortega-Jiménez, César H. & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Pérez-Díez de los Ríos, José Luis, 2019. "Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.
    6. Omrane, Amina, 2022. "The main determinants and effects of product innovation: An exploratory study on the pastry companies of the region of Sfax (in Tunisia)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Prajogo, Daniel I., 2016. "The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 241-249.
    8. Sheikh Muhamad Hizam Sheikh Khairuddin & Zuhaib Hassan Qureshi & Rosni Ab. Wahid & Shehnaz Tehseen & Zulfiqar Hussain Pathan & Mohammad Rafat Khan, 2019. "A Conceptual Study on Contingent Impact of External Integration on Innovation Sme Business Success Relationship," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 370-380, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:9:y:2007:i:4:p:380-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.