IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbfmi/v2y2016i3p190-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditing marketing and corporate governance

Author

Listed:
  • Gholamhossein Mahdavi
  • Abbas Ali Daryaei

Abstract

The overall objective of this paper is to examine Parsons' social action theory about Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants' attitude toward three important components of marketing, auditing and corporate governance. The study is based on a survey of 257 auditors in Iran. Using a questionnaire, we conducted our analysis by applying a binary Probit regression. The results show that attitude to marketing has a significant positive relationship with balance time between auditing and marketing activities at the 90% level. Auditor's view on the importance of marketing activities does not influence the time balance between auditing and marketing activities. Also, the attitude of auditors to marketing has a significant positive relationship with attitude to corporate governance at the 99% level. These findings had implications for auditing theory and practice in illuminating the relationship of marketing and auditing in a wider business context in terms of improving corporate governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2016. "Auditing marketing and corporate governance," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 190-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:190-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78603
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jurate Steponaviciute & Algis Zvirblis & Liudmila Zumeriene, 2010. "Analysis Of Audit Market And Audit Firms Activity In Lithuania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(12), pages 1-30.
    2. Black, Bernard S. & Love, Inessa & Rachinsky, Andrei, 2006. "Corporate governance indices and firms' market values: Time series evidence from Russia," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 361-379, December.
    3. Chaney, Paul K. & Jeter, Debra C. & Erickson Shaw, Pamela, 2003. "The impact on the market for audit services of aggressive competition by auditors," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 487-516.
    4. Stefanie Pfahl, 2005. "Institutional sustainability," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 80-96.
    5. Pamela Kent & Jenny Stewart, 2008. "Corporate governance and disclosures on the transition to International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 649-671, December.
    6. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    7. Broberg, Pernilla & Umans, Timurs & Gerlofstig, Carl, 2013. "Balance between auditing and marketing: An explorative study," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 57-70.
    8. Hay, David & Knechel, W. Robert, 2010. "The effects of advertising and solicitation on audit fees," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 60-81, January.
    9. Hsueh‐Liang Wu, 2008. "How do Board–CEO Relationships Influence the Performance of New Product Introduction? Moving from Single to Interdependent Explanations," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 77-89, March.
    10. Walid M. Alissa & Vedran Capkun & Thomas Jeanjean & Nadja Suca, 2014. "An empirical investigation of the impact of audit and auditor characteristics on auditor performance," Post-Print hal-01147193, HAL.
    11. Alissa, Walid & Capkun, Vedran & Jeanjean, Thomas & Suca, Nadja, 2014. "An empirical investigation of the impact of audit and auditor characteristics on auditor performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 495-510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madher E. Hamdallah & Salem Al-N’eimat & Anan F. Srouji & Manaf Al-Okaily & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Shalini TALWAR & Chitra PUNDIR, 2019. "Corporate Governance: A Look through the Auditing Lens with reference to India," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 78-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2016. "Attitude toward auditing, marketing and corporate governance (An examination based in Parsons’ social action theory)," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini, 2021. "The relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1211-1239, December.
    3. Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2017. "Attitude toward business environment of auditing, corporate governance and balance between auditing and marketing," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 1019-1040, Julio-Sep.
    4. Najihah Yaacob & Ayoib Che-Ahmad, 2012. "Audit Fees after IFRS Adoption: Evidence from Malaysia," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(1), pages 31-46, June.
    5. Bandyopadhyay, Sati P. & Chen, Changling & Yu, Yingmin, 2014. "Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit market concentration, and audit quality: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 18-31.
    6. Bucaro, Anthony C., 2019. "Enhancing auditors' critical thinking in audits of complex estimates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 35-49.
    7. Kam-Wah Lai & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2021. "Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1190, April.
    8. Pernilla Broberg & Torbjörn Tagesson & Daniela Argento & Niclas Gyllengahm & Ola Mårtensson, 2017. "Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 331-350, June.
    9. Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei & Omid Faraji & Zabihollah Rezaee & Reza Gholami-Jamkarani & Mehdi Yari, 2024. "Substantive or symbolic compliance with regulation, audit fees and audit quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, March.
    10. Su, Xijia & Wu, Xi, 2017. "Public Disclosure of Audit Fees and Bargaining Power between the Client and Auditor: Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 64-76.
    11. Abdul Mansulu & Daniel Anarfi, 2019. "Discretionary Disclosure of Listed Non-Financial Firms in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Ghana," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(3), pages 823-837.
    12. Mohammad I Azim, 2012. "Corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance: A structural equation model analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 481-505, December.
    13. Florian Hoos & Jorien Louise Pruijssers & Michel W. Lander, 2019. "Who’s Watching? Accountability in Different Audit Regimes and the Effects on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 563-575, May.
    14. Blaufus, Kay & Schöndube, Jens Robert & Wielenberg, Stefan, 2020. "Strategic interactions between tax and statutory auditors and different information regimes: Implications for tax audit efficiency," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 249, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    15. Hussein Abedi Shamsabadi & Byung-Seong Min & Richard Chung, 2016. "Corporate governance and dividend strategy: lessons from Australia," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 583-610, October.
    16. Gholamhossein Mahdavi & Abbas Ali Daryaei, 2017. "Audit firm, retain or rotation? (client and audit firm perspectives)," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1313559-131, January.
    17. Blaufus, Kay & Lorenz, Daniela & Milde, Michael & Peuthert, Benjamin & Schwäbe, Alexander N., 2022. "Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Cleston Alexandre dos Santos & Paulo Roberto da Cunha, 2021. "Effect of Trust between the Time Pressure and Complexity in Judging and Decision-Making in Auditing," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(5), pages 200037-2000.
    19. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    20. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:190-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=156 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.