IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v3y2013i3p241-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sukuk spreads determinants and pricing model methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Nader Naifar
  • Slim Mseddi

Abstract

The investment concept of sukuk was created as an alternative to conventional bonds since interest-bearing instruments are prohibited under Islamic law. Sukuk (commonly referred to Islamic bonds) represent a proportional ownership of tangible assets or a pool of assets. However, the key to understanding these instruments as a financial innovation is to focus on their pricing and risk characteristics. The challenge for sukuk issuing entities becomes to provide an efficient pricing model, which is compliant with Islamic law principles. The aims of this paper are two-fold. Firstly, we explore empirically the determinants of sukuk yield spreads and we describe within a coherent empirical framework the economic implications of the links between sukuk yield spreads, stock market conditions and macroeconomic variables; Secondly, we provide a methodology for estimating the fair price of sukuk in the presence of default risk. This paper presents the first empirical study for the determinants of sukuk spreads using available data and it has several practical implications that are of value for investors, risk managers and the development of Islamic financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Nader Naifar & Slim Mseddi, 2013. "Sukuk spreads determinants and pricing model methodology," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 241-257.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:241-257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54425
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Saad, Noriza & Haniff, Mohd Nizal & Ali, Norli, 2020. "Corporate governance mechanisms with conventional bonds and Sukuk’ yield spreads," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Khalid Almeshal & Nader Naifar, 2016. "A quantile regression approach and nonlinear analysis with Archimedean copulas to explain the movements of residential real estate prices," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 374-395.
    3. Naifar, Nader & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2016. "Do global financial distress and uncertainties impact GCC and global sukuk return dynamics?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 57-69.
    4. Elie Bouri & Riza Demirer & Rangan Gupta & Hardik A. Marfatia, 2019. "Geopolitical Risks and Movements in Islamic Bond and Equity Markets: A Note," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 367-379, April.
    5. Juan Carlos Reboredo & Nader Naifar, 2017. "Do Islamic Bond (Sukuk) Prices Reflect Financial and Policy Uncertainty? A Quantile Regression Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 1535-1546, July.
    6. Arafat Mansoor Al-raeai & Zairy Zainol & Ahmad Khilmy bin Abdul Rahim, 2018. "The Role of Macroeconomic Factors on Sukuk Market Development of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 333-339.
    7. Naifar, Nader & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Al dohaiman, Mohamed S., 2016. "Dependence structure between sukuk (Islamic bonds) and stock market conditions: An empirical analysis with Archimedean copulas," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 148-165.
    8. Rida Ahroum & Boujemâa Achchab, 2021. "Harvesting Islamic risk premium with long–short strategies: A time scale decomposition using the wavelet theory," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 430-444, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:241-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.