IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idn/journl/v8y2022isifp107-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeated Giving Of Cash Waqf: A Case Study Of Sabah, Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Izzati Binti Justine

    (Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia)

  • Mohamad Isa Abd Jalil

    (Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study examines repeated waqf contributions in Sabah State, Malaysia. Religious obligation, benevolence, and familiarity with and trust in the waqf institution are the variables that are expected to have a positive relationship with the repeated behaviour of giving waqf cash. These antecedents are drawn from previous empirical studies. A total of 200 respondents who have repeatedly contributed to cash waqf shared their opinions through a survey form distributed by using the “convenience sampling†method. The collected data were then tested employing variance-based structural equation modelling and the partial least squares path modelling method using SmartPLS 3.3 software. The results of the analysis show that all the variables, namely religious adherence, benevolence, familiarity with the waqf institution, and trust in the waqf institution significantly influence the behaviour of repeated cash waqf contributions. The study findings could be used by future researchers as a point of reference. In practice, waqf institutions could also benefit from the findings by better understanding their donors’ wishes and preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Izzati Binti Justine & Mohamad Isa Abd Jalil, 2022. "Repeated Giving Of Cash Waqf: A Case Study Of Sabah, Malaysia," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 8(Special I), pages 107-124, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:idn:journl:v:8:y:2022:i:sif:p:107-124
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i0.1448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jimf-bi.org/index.php/JIMF/article/view/1448/923
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i0.1448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cash waqf; Repetition; Contribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idn:journl:v:8:y:2022:i:sif:p:107-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lutzardo Tobing or Jimmy Kathon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bigovid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.