IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/sarjnl/v11y2022i3p38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maize Farmers' Perceptions of Climate Change and Determinants of Adaptation Decisions in Northern Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Alem Redda
  • Tamado Tana
  • Yibekal Alemayehu
  • Gebre Hadgu
  • Bisrat Elias
  • Atkilt Girma

Abstract

Rain-based agriculture is highly vulnerable to climate variability and change. Farmers' decisions about how to adapt to climate change are influenced by socioeconomic setups and local institutions. The objectives of this study were to evaluate farmers' perceptions of climate change, identify the local adaptation techniques they used, and pinpoint the major socio-economic challenges they faced when putting those strategies into practice. 250 maize farmers were used as samples for the collection of primary data. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data on socioeconomic characteristics, and the multinomial logistic model was used to identify the factors influencing farmers' decisions to adapt. The majority of households (91.2%) believed that climate change is occurring, and its main symptoms include unpredictable rainfall (88.4%), warming temperatures (83.2%), and more frequent droughts (79.2%). The findings show that farmers' perceptions of rising temperatures and weather data matched; however, there was a discrepancy between perception and rainfall records. Reduced maize yields (78%) and declining soil fertility (83%) were the two biggest effects of climate change perceived by the farmers. Accordingly, 92.8% of farmers have developed their best adaptation, primarily through the combination of crops and livestock (24%) and the adoption of enhanced maize varieties (20.8%). The econometric model's findings showed that the primary variables influencing farmers' decisions were age, gender, education, farm size, animal ownership, and poverty. The study recommends supporting the indigenous adaptation techniques of maize farmers from a variety of institutional, policy, and technological angles, both at the farmer and farm levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Alem Redda & Tamado Tana & Yibekal Alemayehu & Gebre Hadgu & Bisrat Elias & Atkilt Girma, 2022. "Maize Farmers' Perceptions of Climate Change and Determinants of Adaptation Decisions in Northern Ethiopia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/download/0/0/47682/51150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/view/0/47682
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristian Rogério Foguesatto & Felipe Dalzotto Artuzo & Edson Talamini & João Armando Dessimon Machado, 2020. "Understanding the divergences between farmer’s perception and meteorological records regarding climate change: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Archana Raghavan Sathyan & Christoph Funk & Thomas Aenis & Lutz Breuer, 2018. "Climate Vulnerability in Rainfed Farming: Analysis from Indian Watersheds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    2. Cristian Rogério Foguesatto & João Armando Dessimon Machado, 2021. "What shapes farmers’ perception of climate change? A case study of southern Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1525-1538, February.
    3. Venkatesh Paramesh & Parveen Kumar & Mohammad Shamim & Natesan Ravisankar & Vadivel Arunachalam & Arun Jyoti Nath & Trivesh Mayekar & Raghuveer Singh & Ashisa K. Prusty & Racharla Solomon Rajkumar & A, 2022. "Integrated Farming Systems as an Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change: Case Studies from Diverse Agro-Climatic Zones of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. A. Amarender Reddy & Anindita Bhattacharya & S. Venku Reddy & Sandra Ricart, 2021. "Farmers’ Distress Index: An Approach for an Action Plan to Reduce Vulnerability in the Drylands of India," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Stefano Mainardi, 2021. "Preference heterogeneity, neighbourhood effects and basic services: logit kernel models for farmers’ climate adaptation in Ethiopia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 6869-6912, May.
    6. Reddy, A Amarender & Bhattacharya, Anindita & Reddy, Venku, 2021. "Significance of Farmers’ Distress Index in Reducing Agrarian Crisis: An Approach to Study Vulnerability in the Context of Dryland Farmers in India," EconStor Preprints 273421, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. B. Igliński & M. Skrzatek & W. Kujawski & M. Cichosz & R. Buczkowski, 2022. "SWOT analysis of renewable energy sector in Mazowieckie Voivodeship (Poland): current progress, prospects and policy implications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 77-111, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.