IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/sarjnl/v11y2022i2p46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Post-weaning Efficiency in Nellore-Angus Crossbred Steers through Model Predicted Residual Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Emilie C. Baker
  • Andy D. Herring
  • Tonya S. Amen
  • Jason E. Sawyer
  • James O. Sanders
  • Clare A. Gill
  • Penny K. Riggs
  • David G. Riley

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate efficiency traits of Nellore-Angus crossbred steers (n = 349) on feed. Steers were fed a grain-based diet beginning at approximately 12 months of age for an average of 140 days. Contemporary groups were born in the fall or spring of 2003 through 2007 in full-sibling embryo transfer families or half-sibling families all sired by the same bulls. Individual intake was measured and weights were recorded to permit calculation of average daily gain. Residual feed intake (RFI) was estimated as the residual of models employing regressions on metabolic mid-test weight and ADG. An additional efficiency metric was also constructed and evaluated- model predicted residual consumption (MPRC). Mixed linear models were used to analyze daily dry matter intake, average daily gain (ADG), metabolic mid-test weight, RFI, and MPRC. Large positive associations of DMI with MPRC and RFI were identified along with low positive associations between metabolic mid-weight with ADG and MPRC. Genome wide association analysis revealed 5 regions associated with DMI, but none for the other traits analyzed. Residual feed intake values varied greatly between the contemporary group value and the overall value for the steers, showing the calculation’s dependency on the reference population. However, MPRC as based upon a standardized population, did not fluctuate. More selection phenotypes and strategies are needed for large-scale improvements in global beef cattle production sustainability. The stability of the MPRC metric could be beneficial for future feed efficiency research across multiple and diverse contemporary groups, and diverse production environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilie C. Baker & Andy D. Herring & Tonya S. Amen & Jason E. Sawyer & James O. Sanders & Clare A. Gill & Penny K. Riggs & David G. Riley, 2022. "Evaluation of Post-weaning Efficiency in Nellore-Angus Crossbred Steers through Model Predicted Residual Consumption," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-46, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/download/0/0/46969/50230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/view/0/46969
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong Wang & W. Richard Teague & Seong C. Park & Stan Bevers, 2015. "GHG Mitigation Potential of Different Grazing Strategies in the United States Southern Great Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hardeep Singh & Brian K. Northup & Gurjinder S. Baath & Prashanth P. Gowda & Vijaya G. Kakani, 2020. "Greenhouse mitigation strategies for agronomic and grazing lands of the US Southern Great Plains," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 819-853, May.
    2. Blignaut, James & Meissner, Heinz & Smith, Hendrik & du Toit, Linde, 2022. "An integrative bio-physical approach to determine the greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sinks of a cow and her offspring in a beef cattle operation: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Tianyi Zeng & Hong Jin & Zhifei Geng & Zihang Kang & Zichen Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Urban Shrinkage on Carbon Dioxide Emissions Efficiency in Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Kreuter, Urs & Teague, Richard, 2021. "Expanding grass-based agriculture on marginal land in the U.S. Great Plains: The role of management intensive grazing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Hardeep Singh & Brian K. Northup & Gurjinder S. Baath & Prashanth P. Gowda & Vijaya G. Kakani, 0. "Greenhouse mitigation strategies for agronomic and grazing lands of the US Southern Great Plains," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 819-853.
    6. Jie Zhang & Zhencheng Xing & Jigan Wang, 2016. "Analysis of CO 2 Emission Performance and Abatement Potential for Municipal Industrial Sectors in Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Alemu, Aklilu W. & Janzen, Henry & Little, Shannan & Hao, Xiying & Thompson, Donald J. & Baron, Vern & Iwaasa, Alan & Beauchemin, Karen A. & Kröbel, Roland, 2017. "Assessment of grazing management on farm greenhouse gas intensity of beef production systems in the Canadian Prairies using life cycle assessment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Stanley, Paige L. & Rowntree, Jason E. & Beede, David K. & DeLonge, Marcia S. & Hamm, Michael W., 2018. "Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 249-258.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.