IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijspjl/v10y2021i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Classification of Colored Textures From a Texture-Ranking Experiment: Observers Ability of Discrimination Quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Amadou Sawadogo
  • Dominique Lafon
  • Simplice Dossou-Gbété

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the construction of Fechnerian scales on a physical dimension of investigated colored textures. For this purpose, we considered the extension of the Mallows-Bradley-Terry model for the analysis of the data collected from a contrast-sorting experiment. A likelihood ratio test procedure was proposed in order to choose between the two following hypotheses- discrimination and non-discrimination between the investigated stimuli. In addition, post-hoc analyzes allowed us to find out which of the stimuli differ from the others. Our findings indicate that the subjective attribute of visual contrast appears to be a psycho physical scale that maps to the physical scale corresponding to the Michelson contrast. Mainly, the estimates of the model index of discrimination parameter of the stimuli show that the ability of the observers to discriminate between the textures according to the visual contrast varies with respect to the color ranges and the textures types. According to the luminance contrasts ability of discrimination, the Isotropic texture type is the best, followed by the Random-dots texture type, then by the Horizontal grating type and the Vertical grating type is the least. The Fechnerian scales on the physical dimension of the Michelson contrast of the colored textures depend on the chromaticness of the colored textures phases and the texture types. The psycho physical method of identification would be the best when determining the related thresholds.

Suggested Citation

  • Amadou Sawadogo & Dominique Lafon & Simplice Dossou-Gbété, 2021. "On the Classification of Colored Textures From a Texture-Ranking Experiment: Observers Ability of Discrimination Quantification," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/download/0/0/44327/46725
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/view/0/44327
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehtibar Dzhafarov & Hans Colonius, 2006. "Reconstructing Distances among Objects from Their Discriminability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 365-386, June.
    2. Douglas Critchlow & Michael Fligner, 1991. "Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 517-533, September.
    3. Amadou Sawadogo & Dominique Lafon & Simplice Dossou Gbété, 2014. "Statistical analysis of rank data from a visual matching of colored textures," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2462-2482, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hatzinger, Reinhold & Dittrich, Regina, 2012. "prefmod: An R Package for Modeling Preferences Based on Paired Comparisons, Rankings, or Ratings," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i10).
    2. Eugster, Manuel J.A. & Leisch, Friedrich & Strobl, Carolin, 2014. "(Psycho-)analysis of benchmark experiments: A formal framework for investigating the relationship between data sets and learning algorithms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 986-1000.
    3. Firth, David, 2005. "Bradley-Terry Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i01).
    4. Araki, Kenji & Hirose, Yoshihiro & Komaki, Fumiyasu, 2019. "Paired comparison models with age effects modeled as piecewise quadratic splines," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 733-740.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:12:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Amadou Sawadogo & Simplice Dossou-Gbété & Dominique Lafon, 2017. "Ties in one block comparison experiments: a generalization of the Mallows–Bradley–Terry ranking model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(14), pages 2621-2644, October.
    7. Mark Glickman, 2001. "Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 673-689.
    8. Carolin Strobl & Florian Wickelmaier & Achim Zeileis, 2011. "Accounting for Individual Differences in Bradley-Terry Models by Means of Recursive Partitioning," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(2), pages 135-153, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.