IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v13y2021i1p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Critical Thinking Skills: Augmented Feedback And Post-Exam Debate: A Follow-Up Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marni Brown
  • Jack Beeber
  • Daniel Boylan

Abstract

Studies have confirmed critical thinking skills contribute to the success of professionals; however, college graduates lack the critical thinking skills needed in today’s workforce. "Student Self-Initiated Challenge of Examination Questions" encourages and increases critical thinking skills by allowing students to challenge objective examination question.. In this follow up study, researches gather qualitative data based on student responses and sentiments towards the SSCEQ method.. Through this method, students noticed improvement in critical thinking, reasoning, and discussion. Furthermore, students enjoyed the ability to explain their perspective and hear other points of view. Overall, students responded positively to the SSCEQ method.

Suggested Citation

  • Marni Brown & Jack Beeber & Daniel Boylan, 2021. "Improving Critical Thinking Skills: Augmented Feedback And Post-Exam Debate: A Follow-Up Study," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v13n1-2021/BEA-V13N1-2021-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Critical Thinking; Classroom Techniques; Objective Examinations; Class Discussion; Participation; Business Law Course;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.