Macroeconomic Variables Influencing the European Convergence of the Romanian Agri-Food Sector
AbstractThe methodological opening necessary to approach the economic convergence was based on a series of recent empirical studies, both at national level, in a European context and at the level of the agri-food sector, compared to overall Romanian economy. The competitiveness, which generates convergence, is usually related to tangible results, such as continuous productivity growth, high real wages and living standard, innovating processes with driving effect. The disarticulation in the Romanian economy dynamics in the last two decades is confirmed by the strong relative instability, measured by the variation coefficients (CoV%), ranging from 6.03% (in total GVA) to 14.83% (in agriculture). The energy intensity – in principle considered as a measure of the energy efficiency of a nation’s economy – experienced a strong regressive trend in Romania, compared to the EU–27 average, and bridging up the gaps requires extremely long periods of time (from 121.2 years to 32.7 years). Out of the six time periods considered as relevant for comparing economic performances, only in two (1993–1996 and 2001–2004) the “real wages – productivity” correlation was in the limits of economic rationality. The intensity of intermediary deliveries of agriculture to food industry was down by more than 35% (from 65.1% in 1989 to only 29.9% in 2007), while the intensity of intermediary deliveries from food industry to agriculture was down by more than 14.5% (from 19.1% in 1989 to 4.6% in 2007). The intensity of intermediary acquisitions of food industry from agriculture decreased by 46.7% (from 76.7% in 1989 to 30.0% in 2007), while that of agriculture from the food industry by 11% (from 18.0% in 1989 to 7.0% in 2007). The gross agricultural output per hectare in Romania had the highest variation coefficient among the seven investigated countries, i.e. 23.5%, compared to only 6.5% in Germany, under the conditions of a large technological performance gap between Romania and the compared countries. The bi-factorial regressional adjustment of the gross agricultural output per hectare, for which a determination coefficient of 80.4% was determined, reflects its pregnant dependence on cereal production. The real income from the agricultural activity in Romania was, in cumulative relative terms, by only 7.8% higher in 2008 compared to 2000; this increase lay between the decline by 9.2% (Netherlands) and the increase by 31.5% (Bulgaria); in Romania’s case, there was a striking amplitude of average yearly modifications, from 27.12% in the period 2001–2004 (2000 = 1), to – 12.85% in the period 2005–2008 (2004 = 1), i.e. the highest difference in rates among the compared countries.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Institute of Agricultural Economics in its journal Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
Volume (Year): 8 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Casa Academiei, Calea 13 Septembrie nr.13, sector 5, Bucureşti 761172
Phone: 004 021 3182411
Fax: 004 021 3182411
Web page: http://www.eadr.ro/
More information through EDIRC
economic convergence; energy intensity; wages–productivity correlation; intermediary deliveries and acquisitions; A Indicator;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models &bull Diffusion Processes
- D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
- O11 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- O47 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Measurement of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
- Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Toderoiu, Filon, 2009. "Real Economic Convergence – European and National Dimension," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 159-180.
- Iancu, Aurel, 2009. "Convergenta Reala," Studii Economice 090701, National Institute of Economic Research.
- Zaman, Gheorghe & Georgescu, George, 2009. "Structural Fund Absorption: A New Challenge For Romania?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(1), pages 136-154, March.
- Nazrul Islam, 2003. "What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 309-362, 07.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corina Saman).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.