IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2020i4p158-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority Approaches to Risk Assessment in the Activities of Entities of the Agricultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Charucka

    (Academy of Finance and Business Vistula, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Olha Vyshnevska

    (Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine)

  • Liliia Kozachenko

    (Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine)

  • Alla Kostyrko

    (Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The development of spheres of the economy is significantly dependent on changes in the external environment. Increasing the production capacity of enterprises, expanding market opportunities, image positions are formed under the influence of a set of management decisions that is a response to certain changes in the environment. The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence and features of priority approaches to risk assessment in the activities of entities of the agricultural sector. It was proved that identifying effective alternatives is an advantage that allows you to get the planned results, minimize costs and limit the overuse of all types of resources. The effectiveness of analytical assessment can be ensured only under clearly defined conditions of partnership and levels of responsibility, a common goal, which is focused on the development of market eneteties. The supplement formed by the authors is related to possible solutions that can be aimed at bringing market enteties to bankruptcy or fictitious bankruptcy, that is, certain fraudulent actions. The making decisions should take into account all possible scenarios of events and risks. Risk assessment should be aimed at obtaining reliable information on the choice of alternative solutions, which will be focused on the timeliness and adequacy of the formation, adoption and adjustment of decisions taking into account the changing situation, its scale and complexity of practical solutions, threat prejudices. It is advisable to form an effective (adequate) risk management strategy that will ensure the achievement of goals. One of the important rules for organizing the management process should be to optimize the relationship between the level of risk and the possible results of themanagement decisionsimplementation, selected alternatives. The difference in risks in the areas of adjustment of management decisions depends on their scale, which determines the tools for implementing the selected alternatives. An important component of the effectiveness of the assessment is the correct analytical task, the choice of an effective research method and adequate to the situation (input conditions) management decision (management decisions). Analytical assessment and risk prediction in a global world cannot be limited territorially, the global world proves the need to adapt and adjust management decisions by market enteties in view of existing and potential hazards, including environmental ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Charucka & Olha Vyshnevska & Liliia Kozachenko & Alla Kostyrko, 2020. "Priority Approaches to Risk Assessment in the Activities of Entities of the Agricultural Sector," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 158-166, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2020:i:4:p:158-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/802-prioritetni-pidhodi-do-ocinki-rizikiv-u-diyalnosti-sub-ektiv-agrarnogo-sektora.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk assessment; analytical task; strategic planning; management decisions; external threats;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2020:i:4:p:158-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.