IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iab/iabjlr/v55part.16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a new COVID-19 panel survey: the IAB high-frequency online personal panel (HOPP)

Author

Listed:
  • Haas, Georg-Christoph

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Müller, Bettina

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Osiander, Christopher

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Schmidtke, Julia

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Trahms, Annette

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Volkert, Marieke

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Zins, Stefan

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

Abstract

"Since January 2020, the COVID-19 crisis has affected everyday life around the world, and rigorous government lockdown restrictions have been implemented to prevent the further spread of the pandemic. The consequences of the corona crisis and the associated lockdown policies for public health, social life, and the economy are vast. In view of the rapidly changing situation during this crisis, policymakers require timely data and research results that allow for informed decisions. Addressing the requirement for adequate databases to assess people’s life and work situations during the pandemic, the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) developed the High-frequency Online Personal Panel (HOPP). The HOPP study started in May 2020 and is based on a random sample of individuals drawn from the administrative data of the Federal Employment Agency in Germany, containing information on all labour market participants except civil servants and self-employed. The main goal of the HOPP study is to assess the short-term as well as long-term changes in people’s social life and working situation in Germany due to the corona pandemic. To assess individual dynamics the HOPP collected data on a monthly (wave one to four) and bi-monthly (wave five to seven) basis. Furthermore, respondents were divided into four groups. The different groups of a new wave were invited to the survey at weekly intervals (wave two to four) or bi-weekly intervals (wave five to seven). This gives us the advantage of being able to provide weekly data while each participant only had to participate on a monthly or bi-monthly basis. In this article, we delineate the HOPP study in terms of its main goals and features, topics, and survey design. Furthermore, we provide a summary of results derived from HOPP and the future prospects of the study." (Author's abstract, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Haas, Georg-Christoph & Müller, Bettina & Osiander, Christopher & Schmidtke, Julia & Trahms, Annette & Volkert, Marieke & Zins, Stefan, 2021. "Development of a new COVID-19 panel survey: the IAB high-frequency online personal panel (HOPP)," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 55, pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabjlr:v:55:p:art.16
    DOI: 10.1186/s12651-021-00295-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-021-00295-z
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s12651-021-00295-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Boll & Dana Müller & Simone Schüller, 2023. "Neither backlash nor convergence: dynamics of intra-couple childcare division during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 57(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Christina Boll & Dana Müller & Simone Schüller, 2021. "Neither Backlash nor Convergence: Dynamics of Intracouple Childcare Division after the First Covid-19 Lockdown and Subsequent Reopening in Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 9091, CESifo.
    3. Ansgar Hudde & Marita Jacob, 2023. "There’s More in the Data! Using Month-Specific Information to Estimate Changes Before and After Major Life Events," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1184, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    4. Hudde, Ansgar & Jacob, Marita, 2022. "There’s More in the Data! Using Month-Specific Information to Estimate Changes Before and After Major Life Events," SocArXiv vueas, Center for Open Science.
    5. Heusler, Anna & Osiander, Christopher & Schmidtke, Julia, 2022. "Essential for society but not equally deserving of preferential treatment? A discrete-choice experiment regarding COVID-19 healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Alipour, Jean-Victor & Falck, Oliver & Schüller, Simone, 2023. "Germany’s capacity to work from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Knize, Veronika & Tobler, Lina & Christoph, Bernhard & Fervers, Lukas & Jacob, Marita, 2021. "Workin’ moms ain’t doing so bad: Evidence on the gender gap in working hours at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic [Läuft bei Müttern: Zur Entwicklung der Geschlechterunterschiede in der Arbeitsze," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Early Vie.
    8. Michael Christl & Silvia Poli & Tine Hufkens & Andreas Peichl & Mattia Ricci, 2023. "The role of short-time work and discretionary policy measures in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 crisis in Germany," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1136, August.
    9. repec:iab:iabfda:202104(de is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Goldfayn-Frank, Olga & Lewis, Vivien & Wehrhöfer, Nils, 2022. "Spending effects of child-related fiscal transfers," Discussion Papers 26/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabjlr:v:55:p:art.16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.