IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnddns/1604298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Hou
  • Meiou Wang
  • Xue Zhou

Abstract

A new model is introduced in the process of evaluating efficiency value of decision making units (DMUs) through data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. Two virtual DMUs called ideal point DMU and anti-ideal point DMU are combined to form a comprehensive model based on the DEA method. The ideal point DMU is taking self-assessment system according to efficiency concept. The anti-ideal point DMU is taking other-assessment system according to fairness concept. The two distinctive ideal point models are introduced to the DEA method and combined through using variance ration. From the new model, a reasonable result can be obtained. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the new constructed model and certify the rationality of the constructed model through relevant analysis with the traditional DEA model.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Hou & Meiou Wang & Xue Zhou, 2018. "Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-9, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:1604298
    DOI: 10.1155/2018/1604298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/DDNS/2018/1604298.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/DDNS/2018/1604298.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2018/1604298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuria Ramón & José L Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2014. "Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(9), pages 1336-1343, September.
    2. Esmeralda Ramalho & Joaquim Ramalho & Pedro Henriques, 2010. "Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, December.
    3. Sungmook Lim & Joe Zhu, 2015. "DEA Cross Efficiency Under Variable Returns to Scale," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 3, pages 45-66, Springer.
    4. Joe Zhu, 2014. "DEA Cross Efficiency," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, edition 3, chapter 4, pages 61-92, Springer.
    5. Y M Wang & S Wang, 2013. "Approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(1), pages 60-69, January.
    6. Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2015. "DEA Cross Efficiency," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 23-43, Springer.
    7. Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong, 2004. "Congestion and returns to scale in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 641-660, March.
    8. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2010. "On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1564-1572, December.
    9. Sungmook Lim & Joe Zhu, 2015. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(3), pages 476-487, March.
    10. W D Cook & J Zhu, 2014. "DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(2), pages 265-268, February.
    11. Seyed Ali Rakhshan, 2017. "Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(8), pages 906-918, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Chen & Muhammad Rizwan & Azhar Abbas, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Agricultural Services in Production Efficiency in Chinese Agriculture: A Case of the Socialized Agricultural Service System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Barbero, Javier & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Zofío, José L., 2021. "Is more always better? On the relevance of decreasing returns to scale on innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balk, Bert M. & (René) De Koster, M.B.M. & Kaps, Christian & Zofío, José L., 2021. "An evaluation of cross-efficiency methods: With an application to warehouse performance," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    2. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    3. Hamid Kiaei & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Reza Kazemi Matin, 2023. "Cross-efficiency evaluation and improvement in two-stage network data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 281-309, February.
    4. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Balk, B.M. & de Koster, M.B.M. & Kaps, C. & Zofío, J.L., 2017. "An Evaluation of Cross-Efficiency Methods, Applied to Measuring Warehouse Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2017-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Juan Aparicio & José L. Zofío, 2020. "New Definitions of Economic Cross-efficiency," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Juan Aparicio & C. A. Knox Lovell & Jesus T. Pastor & Joe Zhu (ed.), Advances in Efficiency and Productivity II, pages 11-32, Springer.
    7. Andreas Dellnitz & Elmar Reucher & Andreas Kleine, 2021. "Efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis using strong defining hyperplanes," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(2), pages 441-465, June.
    8. Pastor, Jesus T. & Aparicio, Juan & Alcaraz, Javier & Vidal, Fernando & Pastor, Diego, 2015. "An enhanced BAM for unbounded or partially bounded CRS additive models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 16-24.
    9. Ebrahimi, Bohlool & Dhamotharan, Lalitha & Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Charles, Vincent, 2022. "A cross-inefficiency approach based on the deviation variables framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Fei Ma & Fei Liu & Qipeng Sun & Wenlin Wang & Xiaodan Li, 2018. "Measuring and Spatio-Temporal Evolution for the Late-Development Advantage in China’s Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    12. Aparicio, Juan & Zofío, José L., 2021. "Economic cross-efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
      • Aparicio, J. & Zofío, J.L., 2019. "Economic Cross-Efficiency," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2019-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2020. "Cross-benchmarking for performance evaluation: Looking across best practices of different peer groups using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Jie Wu & Junfei Chu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Liang Liang, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology selection," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 5990-6007, October.
    15. Heydari, Chiman & Omrani, Hashem & Taghizadeh, Rahim, 2020. "A fully fuzzy network DEA-Range Adjusted Measure model for evaluating airlines efficiency: A case of Iran," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Giannis Karagiannis & Georgia Paschalidou, 2017. "Assessing research effectiveness: a comparison of alternative nonparametric models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 456-468, April.
    17. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.
    18. Shiang-Tai Liu & Yueh-Chiang Lee, 2021. "Fuzzy measures for fuzzy cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 369-398, May.
    19. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud, 2021. "On Pareto-optimality in the cross-efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 247-257.
    20. Carrillo, Marianela & Jorge, Jesús M., 2018. "Integrated approach for computing aggregation weights in cross-efficiency evaluation," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 256-264.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:1604298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.