IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1178-d82942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Mega Projects Alter the City to Be More Sustainable? Spatial Changes Following the Seoul Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Chehyun Ryu

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Youngsang Kwon

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Integrated Research Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

Urban megaprojects change the city in various ways over a long period of time. These changes may be very clear and calculable, but it is the changes that follow which are unpredictable and extensive. Especially in fast-changing cities like Seoul, Korea, projects like the Cheonggyecheon Restoration have massive effects on the surrounding environment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the spatial changes in the downtown area after the Cheonggycheon Restoration Project (2005). The economic; social, and physical effect and the outcome of the restoration project have been studied before the restoration, but the actual changes that occurred afterwards were understudied. Since subsequent spatial changes in the surrounding area occur over a long period, continuous observation on the physical effects should be made. Thus, unlike most studies that focus on the immediate before and after effect of the Cheonggycheon Restoration Project, this study focuses on the ten years of physical changes that followed the restoration. The study covers roughly fourteen large blocks, which were divided into seven categories based on current land use and the historical background of the city form. Physical changes of newly-built buildings, the number of renovations or building extensions, and socio-spatial changes, such as the rise and fall of urban industries, changes in building use, and overall changes in the characteristic of the blocks, were analyzed in accordance with their historical development of the city form. Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the Cheonggyecheon Restoration project, this study provides a better understanding of the overall effect of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Chehyun Ryu & Youngsang Kwon, 2016. "How Do Mega Projects Alter the City to Be More Sustainable? Spatial Changes Following the Seoul Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1178-:d:82942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2012. "Emerging cities of the third wave," Chapters, in: A World in Emergence, chapter 5, pages 64-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Stella Kostopoulou, 2013. "On the Revitalized Waterfront: Creative Milieu for Creative Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Allen J. Scott & Michael Storper, 2007. "Regions, Globalization, Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(sup1), pages 191-205.
    4. Alasdair Turner, 2007. "From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(3), pages 539-555, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    2. Fernando MARTÍN & Roberta CURIAZI, 2020. "Distritos Industriales En Las Provincias De Ecuador Y El Sector Manufacturero Del Cuero De Quisapincha," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 20(2), pages 121-138.
    3. Tomaz Dentinho & João Borba, 2014. "Spatial impacts of economic crisis. Scenarios for the Portuguese Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa14p144, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Ellis, Paul D., 2007. "Paths to foreign markets: Does distance to market affect firm internationalisation?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 573-593, October.
    5. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "The Assessment of Creative Waterfronts: A Case Study of the Kyrenia Waterfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Thomas Farole & Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2007. "Social capital, rules, and institutions: A cross-country investigation," Sciences Po publications 2007-12, Sciences Po.
    7. Simona Iammarino, 2018. "FDI and regional development policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 157-183, December.
    8. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Holmström-Lind, Christine & Holm, Ulf & Tallman, Steve, 2015. "Do I stay or do I go? Sub-national drivers for post-entry subsidiary development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 266-275.
    9. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From the uneven de-diversification of local financial resources to planning policies: The residentialization hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1454-1472, September.
    10. Prokop, Daniel, 2021. "University entrepreneurial ecosystems and spinoff companies: Configurations, developments and outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Tobias Franz, 2019. "Why ‘Good Governance’ Fails: Lessons from Regional Economic Development in Colombia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 776-785, July.
    12. Ina Drejer & Anker Lund Vinding, 2005. "Location and collaboration: Manufacturing firms' use of knowledge intensive services in product innovation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 879-898, September.
    13. Jose M Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Ainhize Gilsanz, 2011. "Social capital and innovation: an empirical analysis in the context of European regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1347, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Harald Bathelt & John A Cantwell & Ram Mudambi, 2018. "Overcoming frictions in transnational knowledge flows: challenges of connecting, sense-making and integrating," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1001-1022.
    15. Iman Cheratian & Saleh Goltabar & Carla Daniela Calá, 2021. "Spatial drivers of firm entry in Iran," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(2), pages 463-496, April.
    16. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Cristiano Antonelli & Federico Barbiellini Amidei, 2011. "The Dynamics of Knowledge Externalities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13292.
    18. Karim K Mardaneh, 2016. "Functional specialisation and socio-economic factors in population change: A clustering study in non-metropolitan Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1591-1616, June.
    19. Daeyoung Jeong & Yun Eui Choi & Lilan Jin & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "Impact of Spatial Change on Tourism by Bridge Connections between Islands: A Case Study of Ganghwa County in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1178-:d:82942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.