IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3106-d1372317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Accuracy of Contour Ridgeline Positioning for Soil Conservation in the Northeast Black Soil Region of China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Li

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
    Liaocheng Innovative High Resolution Data Technology Co., Liaocheng 252059, China)

  • Wenjing Zhao

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China)

  • Jing Wang

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China)

  • Xiaozhe Geng

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China)

  • Chunyu Song

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, China)

Abstract

The Northeast black soil region is China’s vital commercial grain base. However, severe soil erosion on slope farmland poses a significant threat to this region’s sustainable agricultural productivity. The transition from traditional downslope ridging to contour ridging (briefly referred to as “contour ridging”) is one of the primary sustainable measures for preventing soil erosion on slope farmland. By integrating high-precision Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and design standards, ArcMap can plan the orientation and position of contour ridgelines and estimate the reduction in soil erosion on slope farmland after implementing contour ridging. Therefore, the degree of discrepancy between the designed and implemented positions of the contour ridgelines directly affects the effectiveness of contour ridging and the precision in evaluating its impacts and benefits. This study aims to assess the position accuracy of contour ridgelines designed by ArcMap 10.5 (here after ArcMap) using high-precision DEMs obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). For this purpose, three fields where contour ridging had already been implemented were selected in the Sanjiang Plain of Heilongjiang Province, China. CORS RTK was used to measure the XYZ coordinates of verification points along implemented ridges precisely. Those measured coordinates were compared with the designed ridgeline positions to analyze the positional discrepancies between the designed and implemented ridgelines. The results indicated the following: (1) The average slope gradient along contour ridgelines measured in the field (0.5~0.6°) was relatively close to that along the ridgelines designed using ArcMap (0.6°), and the elevation changes along most of the contour ridgelines showed a pattern of being higher in the middle and lower on both sides. (2) The positional offset between most of the measured and designed ridgelines was less than the width of a single ridge (1.3 m), and the median offset was one-third of the width of a single ridge. (3) The positional offset caused by the movement of ridging machinery could be larger than the offset resulting from the baseline setup, and verification points with larger positional offsets were often located at the edges of the plots as well as turns of the ridgelines. Therefore, during the designing ridgelines process, the turns should be made as smooth as possible. During ridging, reducing the speed at these turns to minimize errors and maintain the accuracy of the ridgeline was recommended. The findings of this study can provide a scientific basis to improve contour ridging design and effect prediction in slope farmland to control soil erosion and enhance agricultural sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Li & Wenjing Zhao & Jing Wang & Xiaozhe Geng & Chunyu Song, 2024. "Evaluating the Accuracy of Contour Ridgeline Positioning for Soil Conservation in the Northeast Black Soil Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3106-:d:1372317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricci, G.F. & Jeong, J. & De Girolamo, A.M. & Gentile, F., 2020. "Effectiveness and feasibility of different management practices to reduce soil erosion in an agricultural watershed," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Xiaoan Chen & Ziwei Liang & Zhanyu Zhang & Long Zhang, 2020. "Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Red Soil Slope Farmland under Natural Rainfall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Wenxuan Guo, 2018. "Application of Geographic Information System and Automated Guidance System in Optimizing Contour and Terrace Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. X.B. Liu & X.Y. Zhang & Y.X. Wang & Y.Y. Sui & S.L. Zhang & S.J. Herbert & G. Ding, 2010. "Soil degradation: a problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 87-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Luo & Lin Zhen & Yunfeng Hu, 2020. "The Effects of Restoration Practices on a Small Watershed in China’s Loess Plateau: A Case Study of the Qiaozigou Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Cuilan LI & Shuqing GAO & Jinjing ZHANG & Lanpo ZHAO & Lichun WANG, 2016. "Moisture effect on soil humus characteristics in a laboratory incubation experiment," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 37-43.
    3. Ricci, Giovanni Francesco & D’Ambrosio, Ersilia & De Girolamo, Anna Maria & Gentile, Francesco, 2022. "Efficiency and feasibility of Best Management Practices to reduce nutrient loads in an agricultural river basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Xuesong Zhan & Shuqi Xin & Chaofeng Shao & Feng Yang & Yuhan Long, 2023. "Study of the Spatio-Temporal Variation of Agricultural Sustainability at National and Provincial Levels in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Aidin Parsakhoo & Seyed Ataollah Hosseini, 2023. "Effect of bioengineering treatments on reduction of soil erosion from road cut slope and fill slope," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(9), pages 367-376.
    6. Hadi Nazaripouya & Mehdi Sepehri & Abbas Atapourfard & Bagher Ghermezcheshme & Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos & Mehdi Khoshbakht & Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Vikas Kumar Rana & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh & Q, 2023. "Evaluating Sediment Yield Response to Watershed Management Practices (WMP) by Employing the Concept of Sediment Connectivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    7. J.J. Zhang & H. Li & H.J. Gao & P. Zhu & Q. Gao & L.C. Wang, 2014. "Effects of long-term fertilization and cropping regimes on total nitrogen and organic nitrogen forms in a Mollisol of Northeast China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(12), pages 544-549.
    8. Abazar Esmali Ouri & Mohammad Golshan & Saeid Janizadeh & Artemi Cerdà & Assefa M. Melesse, 2020. "Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in Kozetopraghi Catchment, Iran: A Mixed Approach Using Rainfall Simulator and Data Mining Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Fathia Jarray & Taoufik Hermassi & Mohamed Mechergui & Claudio Zucca & Quang Bao Le, 2023. "Long-Term Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil Erosion in a Tunisian Semi-Arid Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Kaiting Xie & Zhaoguo Zhang & Faan Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Variable-State Robust Fusion Algorithm for Ranging Analysis Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Nina Noreika & Tailin Li & Julie Winterova & Josef Krasa & Tomas Dostal, 2022. "The Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on the Small Water Cycle: From the Farm- to the Management-Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Bořivoj Šarapatka & Marek Bednář, 2022. "Rainfall Erosivity Impact on Sustainable Management of Agricultural Land in Changing Climate Conditions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, March.
    13. X.W. Chen & A.Z. Liang & S.X. Jia & X.P. Zhang & S.C. Wei, 2014. "Impact of tillage on physical characteristics in a Mollisol of Northeast China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(7), pages 309-313.
    14. Wu, Lei & Liu, Xia & Chen, Junlai & Li, Jinfeng & Yu, Yang & Ma, Xiaoyi, 2022. "Efficiency assessment of best management practices in sediment reduction by investigating cost-effective tradeoffs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Tsun-Hua Yang & Wen-Cheng Liu, 2020. "A General Overview of the Risk-Reduction Strategies for Floods and Droughts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Huang, Chunbo & Zhao, Dengyue & Liao, Qipeng & Xiao, Mingzhu, 2023. "Linking landscape dynamics to the relationship between water purification and soil retention," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Ž. Videnović & M. Simić & J. Srdić & Z. Dumanović, 2011. "Long term effects of different soil tillage systems on maize (Zea mays L.) yields," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 186-192.
    18. Wang, Jilei & Shi, Xiangxue & Li, Zizhong & Zhang, Yan & Liu, Yanqing & Peng, Yuxing, 2021. "Responses of runoff and soil erosion to planting pattern, row direction, and straw mulching on sloped farmland in the corn belt of northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    19. Futao Zhang & Yunfa Qiao & Xiaozeng Han & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Variation of soil organic matter depends on light-fraction organic matter under long-term monocropping of different crops," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(10), pages 588-599.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3106-:d:1372317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.