IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p637-d1317151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Green Features of “Phumdi” as a Sustainable Material: A Comparative Analysis with Bamboo, Wood, Metal, and Plastic

Author

Listed:
  • Kshetrimayum Dideshwor Singh

    (School of Art and Design, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Xiduo Yi

    (School of Art and Design, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Lenin S. Shagolsem

    (Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology Manipur, Imphal 795004, India)

  • Jayatek Toijam

    (College of Textile, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

Abstract

Sustainable materials and their potential application in building industries are gaining attention; however, there is still largely unexplored floating biomass, notably “Phumdi”, as a sustainable floating building material. Phumdi, a distinctive floating biomass, is observed in specific wetland habitats in the Loktak Lake located in Manipur, India. This heterogeneous mass of vegetation, organic matter, and soil has been utilised by several communities for various purposes, such as medicine, food, forage, and material for building houses, handicrafts, and aquaculture activities. Such floating bodies serve as a sanctuary for a wide range of flora and fauna. The study aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of phumdi as a sustainable floating material in comparison with other widely recognized construction materials such as recycled plastics, bamboo, corrugated metal sheets, and wood by evaluating the “green feature” chart. The research and experiments carried out on phumdi have underscored the highest sustainability level for its use, i.e., 15 green features, followed by wood and bamboo with 14 features, and the other two materials with low sustainability performance: plastic barrels with seven features and corrugated zinc metal sheets with eight features. Further investigation is necessary for the advancement of this material as a viable alternative for biomass-based building materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Kshetrimayum Dideshwor Singh & Xiduo Yi & Lenin S. Shagolsem & Jayatek Toijam, 2024. "Assessing Green Features of “Phumdi” as a Sustainable Material: A Comparative Analysis with Bamboo, Wood, Metal, and Plastic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:637-:d:1317151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/637/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/637/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Tam, C.M., 2006. "A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 209-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junwu Wang & Yinghui Song & Wei Wang & Suikuan Wang & Feng Guo & Jiequn Lu, 2022. "Marine Construction Waste Recycling Mechanism Considering Public Participation and Carbon Trading: A Study on Dynamic Modeling and Simulation Based on Sustainability Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Hao Liu & Kaizhi Liu & Yiqi Xiao & Peng Zhang & Meixia Zhang & Youzeng Zhu & Kaixin Liu & Tianshuo Xu & Rui Huang, 2022. "Properties of Lightweight Controlled Low-Strength Materials Using Construction Waste and EPS for Oil and Gas Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Dimitra Papadaki & Dimitrios A. Nikolaou & Margarita N. Assimakopoulos, 2022. "Circular Environmental Impact of Recycled Building Materials and Residential Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Héctor Hernández & Felipe Ossio & Michael Silva, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainability and Efficiency Metrics in Modern Methods of Construction: A Case Study Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Wang, Jiayuan & Li, Zhengdao & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2014. "Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at the design stage: A Shenzhen case study, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-7.
    6. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi & Muneera Esa, 2021. "Main Challenges to Concrete Recycling in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Afiqah R. Radzi & Saud Almutairi & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Concrete Recycling in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Husnain Haider & Sulaiman Yousef AlMarshod & Saleem S. AlSaleem & Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali & Majed Alinizzi & Mohammad T. Alresheedi & Md. Shafiquzzaman, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Ting Wang & Kaiyi Li & Defu Liu & Yang Yang & Dong Wu, 2022. "Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:637-:d:1317151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.