IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7222-d1133482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability-Level Evaluation of the Construction Site above the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Wang

    (School of Spatial Informatics and Geomatics Engineering, Anhui University of Sciences and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    Key Laboratory of Aviation-Aerospace-Ground Cooperative Monitoring and Early Warning of Coal Mining-Induced Disasters of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui University of Science and Technology, KLAHEI (KLAHEI18015), Huainan 232001, China
    Coal Industry Engineering Research Center of Mining Area Environmental and Disaster Cooperative Monitoring, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Qingbiao Guo

    (School of Spatial Informatics and Geomatics Engineering, Anhui University of Sciences and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 100000, China)

  • Xuexiang Yu

    (School of Spatial Informatics and Geomatics Engineering, Anhui University of Sciences and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

Abstract

Mineral resource-based cities have formed a large number of goafs due to the long-term mining of coal. It is of great significance to make full use of the abandoned land resources above the goaf to promote the transformation and development of resource-based cities. In order to avoid the threat of surface residual deformation to the proposed construction project, it is an urgent problem to obtain the stability results of the construction site accurately. First of all, based on the principles of relevance, hierarchy, representativeness and feasibility of index selection, 10 indexes are selected to construct the stability evaluation index system. Then the subjective weight and objective weight of evaluation indexes are determined based on improved AHP, rough set and CRITIC methods, which improves the accuracy of the determination of the index weights. In addition, the membership degree of each index is determined using the cloud model. Finally, the stability grade can be obtained according to the maximum membership degree theory. The above researches are applied to evaluate the stability of the Mianluan expressway construction site, and the results show that the stability level of the study area is not uniform and that there are two states: stable and basically stable. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the subjective weight of each index is carried out, the index stopping time has the highest sensitivity to weight (12.44%), which is far lower than the corresponding weight change rate of 100%, indicating that the determination of weight is scientific and reasonable. These things considered, the reliability of the evaluation result is indirectly verified according to the field leveling. This research can provide a reference for the effective utilization of land resources above an old goaf.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Wang & Qingbiao Guo & Xuexiang Yu, 2023. "Stability-Level Evaluation of the Construction Site above the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7222-:d:1133482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingbiao Guo & Guangli Guo & Yingming Li & Lei Wang & Xingwang Zhao, 2019. "Stability Evaluation of an Expressway Construction Site above an Abandoned Coal Mine Based on the Overlay and Index Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Zaicheng Xu & Wei Xu & Peng Zhou & Zhenhua Zhu & Junyi Zhao & Peng Gao, 2023. "Research on Coal Mine Goaf Restoration Based on Stability of Overlying Rocks and Numerical Simulation Analysis: A Case Study of Jingmen Garden Expo Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Erhu Bai & Wenbing Guo & Yi Tan & Mingjie Guo & Peng Wen & Zhiqiang Liu & Zhibao Ma & Weiqiang Yang, 2022. "Regional Division and Its Criteria of Mining Fractures Based on Overburden Critical Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Kazançoglu, Yigit & Ada, Erhan & Ozturkoglu, Yucel & Ozbiltekin, Melisa, 2020. "Analysis of the barriers to urban mining for resource melioration in emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingyan Liu & Wenwen Zheng & Huimin Li & Jia Chen, 2023. "Evaluation of Flooding Disaster Risks for Subway Stations Based on the PSR Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Mengqi Guo & Mingyi Xie & Guangcai Xu, 2023. "Sustainable Livelihood Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Rural Households: A Case Study of Beijing Ecological Conservation Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Rabe & Dalia Streimikiene & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "The Concept of Risk and Possibilities of Application of Mathematical Methods in Supporting Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. T. Sivageerthi & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & Syed Mithun Ali & Ali AlArjani & Koppiahraj Karuppiah, 2022. "Modeling Challenges for Improving the Heat Rate Performance in a Thermal Power Plant: Implications for SDGs in Energy Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Diankai Wang & Inna Gryshova & Anush Balian & Mykola Kyzym & Tetiana Salashenko & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olexandr Davidyuk, 2022. "Assessment of Power System Sustainability and Compromises between the Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Xiaolong Yang & Dongxiao Niu & Meng Chen & Keke Wang & Qian Wang & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "An Operation Benefit Analysis and Decision Model of Thermal Power Enterprises in China against the Background of Large-Scale New Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Carmen Ferrara & Giovanni De Feo, 2021. "Environmental Assessment of the Recycled Paper Production: The Effects of Energy Supply Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Hongyan Qin & Jingui Zhang & Zhiheng Cheng & Zhenhua Ouyang & Liang Chen & Haiyang Yi & Xidong Zhao & Yang Li & Hao Liu, 2022. "Research on Overburden Failure Characteristics Based on the Theory of Plates and Shells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Dagmara Perżyło & Katarzyna Szafulera & Marek Kruczkowski & Michał Pilch, 2022. "The Use of Geomaterials to Restore the Utility Value of Post-Mining Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Ehsan Javanmardi & Sifeng Liu & Naiming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Sustainability Studies: A Systematic Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Anu P. Alex & V. S. Manju & V. Hima & Leema Peter, 2023. "Assessment of sustainable mobility indicators for an emerging satellite city in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10447-10463, September.
    11. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Yaqiang Gong & Guangli Guo & Guojian Zhang & Kaikai Guo & Qiu Du & Liping Wang, 2021. "A Vertical Joint Spacing Calculation Method for UDEC Modeling of Large-Scale Strata and Its Influence on Mining-Induced Surface Subsidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Wioletta Lipka & Cezary Szwed, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Rating Method for Selecting a Clean Coal Energy Generation Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    15. Erhu Bai & Xueyi Li & Wenbing Guo & Yi Tan & Mingjie Guo & Peng Wen & Zhibao Ma, 2022. "Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Surface Residual Deformation above Longwall Abandoned Goaf," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Zenonas Turskis & Nikolaj Goranin & Assel Nurusheva & Seilkhan Boranbayev, 2019. "A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Theofanis G. Xouleis, 2019. "Development of a Holistic Assessment Framework for Industrial Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Nima Pirhadi & Xiaowei Tang & Qing Yang & Fei Kang, 2018. "A New Equation to Evaluate Liquefaction Triggering Using the Response Surface Method and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Eheliyagoda, Disna & Li, Jinhui & Geng, Yong & Zeng, Xianlai, 2022. "The role of China's aluminum recycling on sustainable resource and emission pathways," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Payam Khazaelpour & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Multi-Aspect Criterion in the PMADM Outline and Its Possible Application to Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7222-:d:1133482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.