IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5589-d1104318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paddy Procurement System for Sustainability: Evidence from Bangladesh Agriculture Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Ashraful Islam

    (Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia
    School of Business, University of South Asia, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Aminul Islam

    (Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia
    Faculty of Business and Entrepreneurship, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
    School of Business Administration, East Delta University, Chattogram 4209, Bangladesh)

  • Farid Ahammad Sobhani

    (School of Business and Economics, United International University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh)

  • Pradip Royhan

    (Asia Pacific International College, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia)

  • Md. Kausar Alam

    (BRAC Business School, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Sharif Hassan

    (Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia
    Department of Business Administration, University of Asia Pacific, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Bangladesh derives one-half of its agricultural GDP and one-sixth of its national income from paddy. It is crucial to the farmers’ ability to survive. This paper aims to investigate current paddy procurement system and farmer awareness in the Bangladeshi agricultural sector to ensure business sustainability. This paper utilised a quantitative approach to research. The research investigated farmers’ consciousness through perception and contentment. For the measurement, a survey of 210 farmers from three Upazilas was conducted using a closed-ended, pre-tested questionnaire. Version 20 of the SPSS programme was used for data analysis. Approximately 67.6% of respondents were unhappy with the current paddy procurement system, according to the study. Approximately 69.10% of respondents believe there is a middleman in the current paddy procurement system, approximately 94.30% of respondents believe the current system needs improvement, and 99.0% believe a new paddy procurement system could be beneficial. Furthermore, these findings led to the conclusion that there is room for improvement in the current paddy procurement system, which will increase the transparency and sustainability of paddy procurement activities for everyone, including farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Ashraful Islam & Md. Aminul Islam & Farid Ahammad Sobhani & Pradip Royhan & Md. Kausar Alam & Md. Sharif Hassan, 2023. "The Paddy Procurement System for Sustainability: Evidence from Bangladesh Agriculture Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5589-:d:1104318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kassem, Hazem S. & Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi & Muddassir, Muhammad & Herab, Ahmed, 2021. "Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Sabur, S. Abdus & Jahan, Hasneen & Reza, M. Selim, 2003. "An Evaluation Of Government Rice Procurement Programme In Selected Areas Of Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 26(1-2), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Dinard Kouadio & Amètépé Nathanaël Beauclair Anani & Bonoua Faye & Yadong Fan, 2023. "Determinants Influencing Cocoa Farmers’ Satisfaction with Input Credit in the Nawa Region of Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Xiaojuan Zhang & Zhengxi Yang, 2022. "Individual and Village Level Factors Affect Farmers’ Satisfaction with Sustainable Rural Development Practices: Evidence from Guangdong Province in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Liangzhen Zang & Yahua Wang & Jinkai Ke & Yiqing Su, 2022. "What Drives Smallholders to Utilize Socialized Agricultural Services for Farmland Scale Management? Insights from the Perspective of Collective Action," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. G. Yoganandan & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & M. Vasan & Abdelrhman Meero, 2022. "Evaluating agripreneurs’ satisfaction: exploring the effect of demographics and emporographics," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Alam, Mohammad & Akter, Shaheen & Begum, Ismat, 2015. "Effectiveness of Rice Procurement Program and the Determinants of the Farm Level Stocks of Rice in Bangladesh," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210942, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Rudzani Vhuyelwani Angel Mudzielwana & Paramu Mafongoya & Maxwell Mudhara, 2022. "An Analysis of Livelihood-Diversification Strategies among Farmworker Households: A Case Study of the Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme, Vhembe District, South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Edgar Yoder & Hazem S. Kassem, 2021. "Extension Agents’ Perceptions of the Role of Extension Services in Organic Agriculture: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5589-:d:1104318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.