IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16294-d1287382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Motivations and Trust Mechanisms in Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Role of Social Alienation

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoyao Guo

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Republic of Korea)

  • Dongphil Chun

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Republic of Korea)

  • Feng Yin

    (Management School, Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330098, China)

  • Yaying Zhou

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study is based on social exchange theory and the UTAUT model to develop a research model to investigate the impact of motivations under the background of established enterprise social media (ESM) in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Motivations like organization rewards (OR), reciprocal benefits (RB), expectation fulfillment (EF), and job relevance (JR) have different impacts on the following two dimensions of trust: affect-based trust (ABT) and technology-based trust (TBT). This study considers the trust mechanism as the mediator in the relationship between motivations and knowledge sharing (KS). It also demonstrates the psychological element of social alienation (SA) as a moderator that influences trust level and its inhibitory effect on knowledge sharing within the organization. The authors in this study collected data from managers and employees in seven enterprises, including three retail enterprises and four information technology (IT) enterprises in China through three waves. In total, 509 responses were received, and 483 valid data were used to test the research model and hypotheses through the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to evaluate the impact of the potential elements on knowledge-sharing behavior. This research found that motivations like OR and RB promote ABT, thereby encouraging knowledge sharing when employees use ESM. The motivations of EF and JR have a direct effect on TBT, as well as promoting knowledge sharing. Both ABT and TBT have mediating roles between motivations and KS. In addition, the research also revealed the negative moderation effect of SA on the relationship between the two types of trust and KS. Specifically, SA gradually weakens the effects of ABT and TBT on KS, especially when employees are experiencing high levels of SA; ABT and TBT have no impact on KS. This study attempts to advance the theoretical and practical insights of motivations on knowledge sharing by exploring mediating effects of trust mechanisms. It also reveals the importance of SA’s moderation effect on the relationship between trust mechanisms and KS under the application of ESM.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoyao Guo & Dongphil Chun & Feng Yin & Yaying Zhou, 2023. "Exploring Motivations and Trust Mechanisms in Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Role of Social Alienation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16294-:d:1287382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul M. Leonardi, 2014. "Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 796-816, December.
    2. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Kęstutis Vileikis, 2016. "Evaluation of Factors Determining the Efficiency of Knowledge Sharing Process in the Lithuanian National Defence System," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(4), pages 842-857, December.
    3. Ma, Danni, 2023. "How does the negotiation between “me” and “we” in professional identity influence interpersonal horizontal knowledge sharing in multinational enterprises: A conceptual model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    4. Miaojie Chen & Mehtab Babar & Ammar Ahmed & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of Enterprise Social Media on Employees’ Competency through the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Luqman, Adeel & Talwar, Shalini & Masood, Ayesha & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Does enterprise social media use promote employee creativity and well-being?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-54.
    6. Muhammad Naeem, 2020. "Understanding the role of social media in organizational change implementation," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1097-1116, March.
    7. Abdulrahman Alyami & Salvatore F. Pileggi & Igor Hawryszkiewycz, 2023. "Knowledge development, technology and quality of experience in collaborative learning: a perspective from Saudi Arabia universities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3085-3104, August.
    8. Muhammad Naeem, 2020. "Understanding the role of social media in organizational change implementation," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1097-1116, March.
    9. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AL-NAKEEB Ahmed A. R. & GHADI Mohammed Yasin, 2024. "Human Resource Management Practices for Effective Organizational Change: A Review of Research in Western and Non-Western Countries," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 7-24, January.
    2. Chen, Xiayu & Ou, Carol & Davison, Robert, 2022. "Internal or external social media? The effects of work-related and social-related use of social media on improving employee performance," Other publications TiSEM 429334bc-b257-4012-b0a9-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Saura, Jose Ramon & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2023. "Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Ahmad M. Alghamdi & Salvatore Flavio Pileggi & Osama Sohaib, 2023. "Social Media Analysis to Enhance Sustainable Knowledge Management: A Concise Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Karunakaran, Arvind & Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2022. "Crowd-based accountability: examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114401, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Richey, Michelle & Ravishankar, M.N., 2019. "The role of frames and cultural toolkits in establishing new connections for social media innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 325-333.
    7. Jabeen, Fauzia & Tandon, Anushree & Azad, Nasreen & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "The dark side of social media platforms: A situation-organism-behaviour-consequence approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    8. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    9. Wen Zhang & Yuting Yang & Huigang Liang, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Enterprise Social Media in Digital Economy: Research Hotspots and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Li, Chia-Ying & Zhang, Jin-Ting, 2023. "Chatbots or me? Consumers’ switching between human agents and conversational agents," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2020. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1357-1376, December.
    13. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 0. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    14. Maryam Khosravi & Mahmood Yahyazadehfar & Mohsen Alizadeh Sani, 2023. "Economic growth and human capital in Iran: A phenomenological study in a major Central Asian economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 645-679, June.
    15. Steffi Siegert & Mikael Holmgren Caicedo & Maria Mårtensson Hansson, 2020. "Boundaryless Twitter Use: On the Affordances of Social Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Jesse Shore & Ethan Bernstein & David Lazer, 2015. "Facts and Figuring: An Experimental Investigation of Network Structure and Performance in Information and Solution Spaces," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1432-1446, October.
    17. Junzhe Zhao & Tengfei Guo & Sudong Shang & Minghui Wang, 2021. "Work along Both Lines: The Positive Impact of Work-Based Social Media Use on Job Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Sarah Salem Ghazwani & Saeed Alzahrani, 2023. "The Use of Social Media Platforms for Competitive Information and Knowledge Sharing and Its Effect on SMEs’ Profitability and Growth through Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Cancan Wang & Rony Medaglia & Tina Blegind Jensen, 2021. "When Ambiguity Rules: The Emergence of Adaptive Governance from (In)Congruent Frames of Knowledge Sharing Technology," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    20. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek & Christina Kyprianou & Marten Risius, 2020. "How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1490-1527, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16294-:d:1287382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.