IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15722-d1276013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Nexus between Conspiracy Beliefs and Creativity, Attitudes toward People, and Psychological Wellbeing: Insights from the 10th European Social Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Aiste Dirzyte

    (Faculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Traku Str. 1, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
    Institute of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities Str. 20, 08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs can have a significant destructive impact on sustainable development. When individuals embrace conspiracy theories, it can result in social mistrust, polarization, and even harmful behaviors. Previous studies linked creativity to intelligence and fairly evidenced links between conspiracy beliefs and paranoid thinking and diminished psychological wellbeing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the associations between conspiracy beliefs and creativity, negative attitudes toward people, and psychological wellbeing. Based on the data derived from the ESS10, several relationships using mediation and SEM analyses were disclosed. The study confirmed that positive attitudes toward people significantly negatively predict conspiracy beliefs and significantly positively predict psychological wellbeing and self-reported creativity, while psychological wellbeing significantly negatively predicts conspiracy beliefs and is a mediator in the links between attitudes toward people and conspiracy beliefs. The SEM model demonstrated an acceptable fit, χ 2 = 987.210; Df = 16; CFI = 0.989; TLI = 0.975; NFI = 0.989; RMSEA = 0.040 [0.038–0.042], SRMR = 0.039. The study supported the insights of A. Hon that “conspiracy theories thrive in the absence of trust”. However, there are several avenues for future research to address potential limitations, including using more comprehensive scales, employing diverse research methods, controlling for confounding variables, or exploring potential moderating variables, such as personality traits or cultural factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiste Dirzyte, 2023. "Exploring the Nexus between Conspiracy Beliefs and Creativity, Attitudes toward People, and Psychological Wellbeing: Insights from the 10th European Social Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15722-:d:1276013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Cover & Jay Daniel Thompson & Ashleigh Haw, 2022. "The Spectre of Populist Leadership: QAnon, Emergent Formations, and Digital Community," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 118-128.
    2. Sabera Turkmani & Sarita Bista & Joanna J. J. Wang & Alexander W. O’Donnell & Catherine Thomson & Natasha Jane Radcliffe & Jennifer Skattebol & Gerry Redmond & Fiona Brooks, 2023. "Social and Emotional Wellbeing Among Young People; the Mitigating Role of Ecological Domains," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 941-962, June.
    3. Fang Chen & Yiming Jing & Adele Hayes & Jeong Lee, 2013. "Two Concepts or Two Approaches? A Bifactor Analysis of Psychological and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 1033-1068, June.
    4. Dustin Tingley & Gernot Wagner, 2017. "Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Don C. Zhang & Tyler L. Renshaw, 2020. "Personality and College Student Subjective Wellbeing: A Domain-Specific Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 997-1014, March.
    2. R. A. Burns, 2020. "Age-Related Differences in the Factor Structure of Multiple Wellbeing Indicators in a Large Multinational European Survey," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 37-52, January.
    3. Bedriye Alıcı & Gürcan Seçim, 2020. "The Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale–Adult Form," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    4. Ashley Hinck, 2022. "Editorial: Populism in and Through Online Communities," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 105-108.
    5. Želinský, Tomáš & Soroková, Tatiana & Petríková, Daniela, 2018. "Economic Characteristics and Subjective Well-Being," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 334-364.
    6. Johannes Bodo Heekerens & Kathrin Heinitz, 2019. "Looking Forward: The Effect of the Best-Possible-Self Intervention on Thriving Through Relative Intrinsic Goal Pursuits," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1379-1395, June.
    7. Ville R. Hartonen & Pertti Väisänen & Liisa Karlsson & Sinikka Pöllänen, 2021. "‘Between heaven and hell’: Subjective well‐being of asylum seekers," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 30-45, January.
    8. Rasmus Karlsson, 2021. "Learning in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Kaylin Ratner & Qingyi Li & Gaoxia Zhu & Melody Estevez & Anthony L. Burrow, 2023. "Daily Adolescent Purposefulness, Daily Subjective Well-Being, and Individual Differences in Autistic Traits," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 967-989, March.
    10. Ningning Liu & Qikang Zhong, 2023. "The impact of sports participation on individuals’ subjective well-being: the mediating role of class identity and health," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Yok-Yong Lee & Kim-Leng Goh, 2023. "The Happiness-Economic Well-Being Nexus: New Insights From Global Panel Data," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    12. Fang Fang Chen & Liying Bai & Jeong Min Lee & Yiming Jing, 2016. "Culture and the Structure of Affect: A Bifactor Modeling Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1801-1824, October.
    13. Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch & Katrin Rehdanz, 2019. "Do climate engineering experts display moral-hazard behaviour?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 231-243, February.
    14. Qingsong Tan & Ningzhe Zhu & Linting Zhang & Feng Kong, 2023. "Disentangling the Relations Between Self-esteem and Subjective Well-being in Emerging Adults: A Two-wave Longitudinal Study," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2177-2199, October.
    15. Ana Blasco-Belled & Radosław Rogoza & Cristina Torrelles-Nadal & Carles Alsinet, 2020. "Emotional Intelligence Structure and Its Relationship with Life Satisfaction and Happiness: New Findings from the Bifactor Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2031-2049, August.
    16. Marta G. Pancheva & Carol D. Ryff & Mario Lucchini, 2021. "An Integrated Look at Well-Being: Topological Clustering of Combinations and Correlates of Hedonia and Eudaimonia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2275-2297, June.
    17. Gul Gunaydin & Hazal Oztekin & Deniz Hazal Karabulut & Selin Salman-Engin, 2021. "Minimal Social Interactions with Strangers Predict Greater Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1839-1853, April.
    18. Marco Lauriola & Luca Iani, 2017. "Personality, Positivity and Happiness: A Mediation Analysis Using a Bifactor Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1659-1682, December.
    19. Brian G. Southwell & J. Scott Babwah Brennen & Ryan Paquin & Vanessa Boudewyns & Jing Zeng, 2022. "Defining and Measuring Scientific Misinformation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 98-111, March.
    20. Robert A. Giacalone & Carole L. Jurkiewicz & Mark Promislo, 2016. "Ethics and Well-Being: The Paradoxical Implications of Individual Differences in Ethical Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 491-506, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15722-:d:1276013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.