IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15150-d1265176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study between Paper and Paperless Aircraft Maintenance: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elif Karakilic

    (Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir 26555, Turkey)

  • Enes Gunaltili

    (Department of Astronautical Engineering, Konya Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya 42090, Turkey)

  • Selcuk Ekici

    (Department of Aviation, Iğdır University, Iğdır 76000, Turkey
    School of Civil Aviation, Nisantasi University, Istanbul 25370, Turkey)

  • Alper Dalkiran

    (School of Aviation Management, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta 32260, Turkey)

  • Ozgur Balli

    (TAI, TUSAS (Turkish Aerospace Industries), Ankara 26220, Turkey)

  • Tahir Hikmet Karakoc

    (Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir 26555, Turkey
    Information Technology Research and Application Center, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul 34445, Turkey)

Abstract

The rapid growth of airlines over the last period has led to the development of the aviation industry, resulting in increased requirements for ancillary services. Nowadays, the demand for the use of paper-based documents is increasing day by day as airlines encourage passengers to use more ancillary products. One of the most important issues in the aviation industry is flight safety. The procedures and instructions required for all aviation operations are organized in accordance with the regulations and printed on paper in accordance with the demands. For this reason, since it is mandatory to keep all aircraft maintenance, repair, and operation records on printed paper and to keep them for a certain period of time, aircraft fly with almost their entire weight on paper. Considering the global hazards in the world, although the aviation sector is the least environmentally damaging of all transportation sectors, new solutions have been sought to make aviation operations less harmful to the environment, minimize errors and risks, allow for faster communication, and be safer and more sustainable. In order to meet the demands, studies on reducing the use of paper have been brought to the agenda. In this study, after a literature review, real data from a maintenance, repair, and overhaul organization are used to suggest digital conveniences that can save costs, increase productivity, save space, facilitate documentation and information sharing, keep personal information more secure, and help the environment through paperless living.

Suggested Citation

  • Elif Karakilic & Enes Gunaltili & Selcuk Ekici & Alper Dalkiran & Ozgur Balli & Tahir Hikmet Karakoc, 2023. "A Comparative Study between Paper and Paperless Aircraft Maintenance: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15150-:d:1265176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Foropon, Cyril & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2018. "When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 18-25.
    2. Kilpi, Jani & Töyli, Juuso & Vepsäläinen, Ari, 2009. "Cooperative strategies for the availability service of repairable aircraft components," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 360-370, February.
    3. Penny Sinclair & Julia Walton, 2003. "Environmental reporting within the forest and paper industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 326-337, September.
    4. Tretheway, Michael W. & Markhvida, Kate, 2014. "The aviation value chain: Economic returns and policy issues," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 3-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Machado, Marcio Cardoso & Gomes Eller Araújo, Michelle Aparecida & Soto Urbina, Ligia Maria & Macau, Flavio Romero, 2016. "A qualitative study of outsourced aeronautical maintenance: The case of Brazilian organizations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 176-184.
    2. Lohmann, Gui & Trischler, Jakob, 2017. "Licence to build, licence to charge? Market power, pricing and the financing of airport infrastructure development in Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 28-37.
    3. Stefan Gössling & Frank Fichert & Peter Forsyth, 2017. "Subsidies in Aviation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Acharya, Abhilash & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Pereira, Vijay & Singh, Poonam, 2018. "Big data, knowledge co-creation and decision making in fashion industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 90-101.
    6. Marta Solórzano-García & Julio Navío-Marco & Luis Manuel Ruiz-Gómez, 2019. "Ambiguity in the Attribution of Social Impact: A Study of the Difficulties of Calculating Filter Coefficients in the SROI Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2020. "Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    8. Yurii Hrinchenko, 2020. "The Ecosystem Approach to the Aviation Industry Development Policy," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 9(2), pages 71-84, June.
    9. Frank Karsten & Marco Slikker & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2012. "Inventory pooling games for expensive, low‐demand spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(5), pages 311-324, August.
    10. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. César Martínez-Olvera & Jaime Mora-Vargas, 2019. "A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Industry 4.0 Value Domains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Mäkelä, Marileena, 2017. "Environmental impacts and aspects in the forest industry: What kind of picture do corporate environmental reports provide?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 178-191.
    13. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Tarmo Räty & Anne Toppinen & Anders Roos & Maria Riala & Anders Q. Nyrud, 2016. "Environmental Policy in the Nordic Wood Product Industry: Insights Into Firms’ Strategies and Communication," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 10-27, January.
    15. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    16. Sylvie Berthelot & Michel Coulmont & Vanessa Serret, 2012. "Do Investors Value Sustainability Reports? A Canadian Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 355-363, November.
    17. Francesco Mercuri & Gaetano della Corte & Federica Ricci, 2021. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainable Business Models: A Case Study of Devoleum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Trischler, Jakob & Lohmann, Gui, 2018. "Monitoring quality of service at Australian airports: A critical analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 63-71.
    19. Ali M Gerged & Christopher J Cowton & Eshani S Beddewela, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Development in the Arab Middle East and North Africa Region: A Longitudinal Analysis of Environmental Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 572-587, May.
    20. Patriarca, Riccardo & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Tronci, Massimo, 2016. "Inventory optimization for a customer airline in a Performance Based Contract," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 206-216.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15150-:d:1265176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.