IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14905-d1260512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Spaces in Urban Environments: Network Planning of Plant Species Composition

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Mityagin

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Nikita Kopyt

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Irina A. Shmeleva

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Sofia Malysheva

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Malysheva

    (Scientific Research Institute of Perspective Urban Development, Italiyanskaya Street 4, 197342 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Aleksandr Antonov

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Aleksey Sokol

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Nikita Zakharenko

    (Sberbank, AI Lab, Department of Data Science, Vavilova Street 19, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tatiana Churiakova

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Semen A. Budennyy

    (Sberbank, AI Lab, Department of Data Science, Vavilova Street 19, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexander V. Boukhanovsky

    (Institute of Design and Urban Studies, ITMO University, Kronverksky Prospect 49, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of automation and decision-making support in forming sustainable assortments of plant species for landscaped areas of cities, taking into account environmental factors, conditions of growing, properties of plant species, and landscaping practices adopted in the region. The automation of plant species and composition planning for planted territories requires formation of a knowledge base and output algorithms, as well as consideration of specific landscaping practices and techniques adopted in the region. It also requires the application of new modeling methods in combination with methods of spatial analysis, which together with the database of available regional plant species forms a recommendation system and provides decision support in the tasks of landscaping for city planners. The feature of the proposed method based on network analysis is the combination and composition of plant species, as well as the properties of invasive species, which require the use of graph models to form a knowledge base. The proposed method can be useful for forming sustainable assortments of plant species for landscaping squares, boulevards, small courtyards in the city, technical areas and other cases that do not involve the creation of individual complex landscape design. As part of the testing of the proposed method, the authors have formed a unique information base of species. The use of such a database, together with the method of selecting the species composition based on their resistances and interspecies compatibility will ensure the expansion of the diversity of species in the created ecosystem, which will make green areas more resistant to external anthropogenic factors and diseases, as well as preventing the spread of species invasive to the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Mityagin & Nikita Kopyt & Irina A. Shmeleva & Sofia Malysheva & Ekaterina Malysheva & Aleksandr Antonov & Aleksey Sokol & Nikita Zakharenko & Tatiana Churiakova & Semen A. Budennyy & Alexander , 2023. "Green Spaces in Urban Environments: Network Planning of Plant Species Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14905-:d:1260512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislav E. Shmelev & Irina A. Shmeleva, 2009. "Sustainable cities: problems of integrated interdisciplinary research," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 4-23.
    2. Irina A. Shmeleva & Stanislav E. Shmelev, 2012. "Climate Change Discourse Analysis: The Russian Case," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Sustainability Analysis, chapter 9, pages 203-253, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Elke Mertens & Richard Stiles & Nilgül Karadeniz, 2022. "Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    4. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    5. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Sanja Gašparović & Ana Sopina & Anton Zeneral, 2022. "Impacts of Zagreb’s Urban Development on Dynamic Changes in Stream Landscapes from Mid-Twentieth Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Ahmet Tolunay & Çağlar Başsüllü, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2023. "Insights into Global Water Reuse Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-30, August.
    11. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.
    12. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Bo Yang & Ming-Han Li & Shujuan Li, 2013. "Design-with-Nature for Multifunctional Landscapes: Environmental Benefits and Social Barriers in Community Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    15. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Donatella Valente & María Victoria Marinelli & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Irene Petrosillo, 2022. "Fostering the Resiliency of Urban Landscape through the Sustainable Spatial Planning of Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Vahid Amini Parsa & Esmail Salehi & Ahmad Reza Yavari & Peter M van Bodegom, 2019. "An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Aevermann Tim & Schmude Jürgen, 2015. "Quantification and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services in Munich, Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 59(3), pages 188-200, December.
    19. J. Amy Belaire & Heather Bass & Heather Venhaus & Keri Barfield & Tim Pannkuk & Katherine Lieberknecht & Shalene Jha, 2023. "High-Performance Landscapes: Re-Thinking Design and Management Choices to Enhance Ecological Benefits in Urban Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Ou Deng & Yiqiu Li & Ruoshuang Li & Guangbin Yang, 2022. "Estimation of Forest Ecosystem Climate Regulation Service Based on Actual Evapotranspiration of New Urban Areas in Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14905-:d:1260512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.