IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13941-d1243766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Streamflow Response to Climate and Land-Use Changes in a Tropical Island Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Can Cao

    (Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Rui Sun

    (Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou 571737, China)

  • Zhixiang Wu

    (Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou 571737, China)

  • Bangqian Chen

    (Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou 571737, China)

  • Chuan Yang

    (Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou 571737, China)

  • Qian Li

    (School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Klaus Fraedrich

    (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The effects of climate change and of land use/cover change (LUCC) on streamflow as demonstrated by hydrological models are pressing issues on the frontiers of global environmental change research. The Nandu River Basin (NRB) as the largest of three river basins on the tropical Hainan Island, China, is subjected to an analysis of streamflow response to climate and to land-use change. It is based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) coupled with climate change signals extracted from the global climate model data in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and with land-use change scenarios modeled by Cellular Automata (CA)—Markov. The results are summarized as follows: (1) Climate change contributed more to streamflow change than land-use change in the NRB, with contributions of 97.57% and 2.43%, respectively. Precipitation and temperature were the most important climate variables, contributing 92.66% and 4.91% to streamflow change. (2) In the tropical island basin from 1990 to 2015, LUCC regulated the hydrological processes in the NRB and affected hydrological processes by increasing evapotranspiration and decreasing surface runoff and subsurface flow, which resulted in decreasing streamflow. (3) Under the climate change and land-use change scenarios of the near-term period (2021–2040), the annual streamflow decreased as during the reference period (1995–2014); particularly, it decreased most (−6.16%) on the SSP126 path. These results present a case study for understanding the hydrological cycle of tropical island basins and to provide a theoretical basis for water resources management and regional sustainable development of tropical islands.

Suggested Citation

  • Can Cao & Rui Sun & Zhixiang Wu & Bangqian Chen & Chuan Yang & Qian Li & Klaus Fraedrich, 2023. "Streamflow Response to Climate and Land-Use Changes in a Tropical Island Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13941-:d:1243766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeyrani, F. & Morid, S. & Srinivasan, R., 2021. "Assessing basin blue–green available water components under different management and climate scenarios using SWAT," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Shuoyang Li & Guiyu Yang & Hao Wang, 2019. "The Runoff Evolution and the Differences Analysis of the Causes of Runoff Change in Different Regions: A Case of the Weihe River Basin, Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eini, Mohammad Reza & Salmani, Haniyeh & Piniewski, Mikołaj, 2023. "Comparison of process-based and statistical approaches for simulation and projections of rainfed crop yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Zarezadeh, Mahboubeh & Delavar, Majid & Morid, Saeed & Abbasi, Hamid, 2023. "Evaluating the effectiveness of macro-level water-saving policies based on water footprint sustainability indicators," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Yuanyao Wen & Tiange You & Yihan Xu & Shuhui Lin & Jing Ning & Xuemin You & Yanglan Xiao, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Level of Water Ecological Civilization Construction in the Min River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Yufei Jiao & Jia Liu & Chuanzhe Li & Wei Wang & Fuliang Yu & Yizhi Wang, 2020. "Quantitative Attribution of Runoff Attenuation to Climate Change and Human Activity in Typical Mountainous Areas: An Enlightenment to Water Resource Sustainable Utilization and Management in North Chi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13941-:d:1243766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.