IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13913-d1243160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Green Competency Matrix Based on Civil Servants’ Perception of Sustainable Development Expertise

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Grigorescu

    (Department of Public Management, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Expozitiei Boulevard, 30A, 012104 Bucharest, Romania
    Academy of Romanian Scientists, Ilfov Street 3, 050094 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ionela Munteanu

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economic Science, Ovidius University of Constanța, Mamaia Boulevard, 124, 900527 Constanta, Romania)

  • Catalin-Daniel Dumitrica

    (Department of Public Management, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Expozitiei Boulevard, 30A, 012104 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina Lincaru

    (Department of Labour Market, National Scientific Research Institute for Labor and Social Protection—INCSMPS, Povernei Street 6, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper analysed the responses of 242 civil servants collected during a survey for public authorities personnel with management or executive responsibilities. The survey focused on the perception of respondents regarding the key competencies and the utility of the sustainability development expert occupation (SDE). Based on the assumption that the responses were influenced by multiple factors, the impact of perceptual theory, agency theory and sustainability theory calibrated the analysis of the collected data. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test the reliability of the received responses and multinominal logistic regression with a single dichotomous variable (Regulation Awareness) and several continuous predictor variables (Specialization, Knowledge, Attributions and Competence) was employed to determine to what extent the SDE occupation would contribute to the implementation of sustainable development policies. This paper argues that the ‘green’ competency matrix appropriate for the implementation of sustainable development policies should include executive, compliance promoting, ethical and reporting competencies. The creation of a green competency matrix is an important step toward changing the organisational culture of the public or private sectors to achieve sustainable and reliable development. This research can help organizations and public authorities understand where their efforts should be focused to efficiently incorporate sustainability development into their systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Grigorescu & Ionela Munteanu & Catalin-Daniel Dumitrica & Cristina Lincaru, 2023. "Development of a Green Competency Matrix Based on Civil Servants’ Perception of Sustainable Development Expertise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13913-:d:1243160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13913/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13913/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anand, Amitabh & Argade, Padmaja & Barkemeyer, Ralf & Salignac, Fanny, 2021. "Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    2. Jiakun Liu & Xinxiang Gao & Yi Cao & Naveed Mushtaq & Jiuming Chen & Li Wan, 2022. "Catalytic Effect of Green Human Resource Practices on Sustainable Development Goals: Can Individual Values Moderate an Empirical Validation in a Developing Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Michele Pinelli & Riccardo Maiolini, 2017. "Strategies for Sustainable Development: Organizational Motivations, Stakeholders' Expectations and Sustainability Agendas," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 288-298, July.
    4. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Higgins, Colin & Tang, Samuel & Stubbs, Wendy, 2020. "On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 395-407.
    6. Ivo Šlaus & Garry Jacobs, 2011. "Human Capital and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-58, January.
    7. Mariusz Dacko & Aleksandra Płonka & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2021. "Sustainable Development According to the Opinions of Polish Experts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Hadi Hussain & Elena Condrea & Adriana Grigorescu & Zahid Yousaf & Mohamed Haffar, 2023. "Zero Waste Management: Investigation of Green Technology, the Green Supply Chain, and the Moderating Role of CSR Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Sadaf Dalirazar & Zahra Sabzi, 2022. "Barriers to sustainable development: Critical social factors influencing the sustainable building development based on Swedish experts' perspectives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1963-1974, December.
    10. Camaren Peter & Mark Swilling, 2014. "Linking Complexity and Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modeling Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oana-Iulia Florea & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Diane-Paula Vancea, 2023. "The Hidden Mechanisms and Impact of International Economic Crime: A Bibliometric Perspective," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 72-79, December.
    2. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Iwona Cieślak, 2024. "An Analysis of the Relationships between Social Capital Levels and Selected Green Economy Indicators on the Example of Polish Voivodeships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Gabrielle Samuel & Federica Lucivero & Bran Knowles & Katherine Wright, 2024. "Carbon Accounting in the Digital Industry: The Need to Move towards Decision Making in Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Florica Brasoveanu, 2023. "Transparency and Public Participation in EU Environmental Decisionmaking: Strengthening Global Governance and Regional Cooperation," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 28-35, December.
    5. Anca Cristina Stanciu & Stefania-Rodica Hubel (Anghel) & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2023. "A Demographic Exploration of Associative Entities in the Local Action Group," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 154-163, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kouassi Marius Honoré Aké & Olivier Boiral, 2023. "Sustainable development and stakeholder engagement in the agri‐food sector: Exploring the nexus between biodiversity conservation and information technology," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 334-348, February.
    2. Ionuț Jianu & Marin Dinu & Dragoș Huru & Alexandru Bodislav, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Income Inequality and Growth from the Perspective of EU Member States’ Stage of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    4. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    5. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    6. Venkateswaran, Viswanathan & S Kumar, Deepak & Gupta, Deepak, 2021. "‘To Trust or Not’: Impact of camouflage strategies on trust in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-126.
    7. Juhani Ukko & Minna Saunila & Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala, 2022. "The importance of sustainability engagement in small businesses supplier collaboration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 1-9, February.
    8. Aikaterini Argyrou & Nicolas Chevrollier & Andre Nijhof, 2023. "The versatile role of sustainable market entrepreneurs in market transformation: An intervention framework for institutional change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 259-273, January.
    9. Fabio Zagonari, 2016. "Four Sustainability Paradigms for Environmental Management: A Methodological Analysis and an Empirical Study Based on 30 Italian Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-34, May.
    10. Xuanmei Yang & Xiangyu Li & Kaifa Lu & Zhong-Ren Peng, 2023. "Integrating rural livelihood resilience and sustainability for post-disaster community relocation: a theoretical framework and empirical study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1775-1803, March.
    11. Josefa García Mestanza & Alfonso Cerezo Medina & Marco Antonio Cruz Morato, 2019. "A Model for Measuring Fair Labour Justice in Hotels: Design for the Spanish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Néstor Le Clech & Juan Carlos Guevara-Pérez & R. Urdaneta-Camacho, 2023. "Human Capital and Non-Renewable Natural Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean: ‘Is It a Curse or a Blessing’?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Francesca Ricciardi & Cecilia Rossignoli & Alessandro Zardini, 2021. "Grand challenges and entrepreneurship: Emerging issues, research streams, and theoretical landscape," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1673-1705, December.
    14. Alīna Safronova & Aiga Barisa, 2023. "Hydrogen Horizons: A Bibliometric Review of Trends in Diverse Emission Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-37, September.
    15. Ioan G. Pop & Sebastian Văduva & Mihai-Florin Talpoș, 2017. "Energetic Sustainability and the Environment: A Transdisciplinary, Economic–Ecological Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Elsy Lediana & Tomy Perdana & Yosini Deliana & Tuhpawana P. Sendjaja, 2023. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention of Youth for Agriculture Start-Up: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Camaren Peter, 2021. "Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Developmental Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Economic Ecosystems and the Entrepreneurial State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Berio, Mark Jason M., 2022. "Analysis of the Sustainability, Vulnerability, and Challenges of Aquaculture Livelihood Projects," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(3), pages 38-62.
    19. Daniel Alonso‐Martínez & Valentina De Marchi & Eleonora Di Maria, 2020. "Which country characteristics support corporate social performance?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 670-684, July.
    20. Armando Calabrese & Roberta Costa & Nathan Levialdi & Tamara Menichini & Roberth Andres Villazon Montalvan, 2020. "Does More Mean Better? Exploring the Relationship between Report Completeness and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13913-:d:1243160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.