IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12642-d1221606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Emission Evaluation of Roadway Construction at Contaminated Sites Based on Life Cycle Assessment Method

Author

Listed:
  • Luorui Zheng

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Yingzhen Li

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Cheng Qian

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Yanjun Du

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions induced by climate change have garnered global attention. Minimizing climate change can be achieved through the reduction of carbon emissions in transportation infrastructure construction and in the production of construction materials. This study aims to calculate carbon emissions in three hypothetical construction scenarios based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) method when a roadway passes across polluted soil at contaminated sites. Three methods are employed to remediate contaminated soil: off-site cement kiln co-processing, on-site ex-situ thermal desorption, and on-site ex-situ solidification/stabilization. Carbon emissions are calculated using the LCA method for each scenario. The baseline carbon emission is estimated for the scenario in which contaminated soil is remediated using the off-site cement kiln co-processing method, and the roadway subgrade is constructed using transported clean soil. In the other two scenarios, contaminated soils are remediated using the on-site ex-situ thermal desorption and solidification/stabilization methods, respectively, and then they are reused as roadway subgrade materials. The LCA analyses demonstrate that the total carbon emission reductions range from 1168.48 to 2379.62 tons per basic unit, corresponding to decreased of 19.31% to 39.33%, respectively, compared to baseline. The reuse of solid waste to replace sand and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) as raw materials in roadway construction reduces carbon emissions by 498.98 tons. Finally, a comparison of carbon emissions between the three scenarios indicates that reducing carbon emissions in the remediation of contaminated soil and reusing solid waste as construction materials are two important methods for achieving overall carbon emission reductions in roadway construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Luorui Zheng & Yingzhen Li & Cheng Qian & Yanjun Du, 2023. "Carbon Emission Evaluation of Roadway Construction at Contaminated Sites Based on Life Cycle Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12642-:d:1221606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12642/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12642/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yue & Bird, Roger N. & Heidrich, Oliver, 2007. "A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 58-73.
    2. Vieira, Castorina Silva & Pereira, Paulo M., 2015. "Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 192-204.
    3. Alberta C. Carpenter & Kevin H. Gardner, 2009. "Use of Industrial By‐Products in Urban Roadway Infrastructure: Argument for Increased Industrial Ecology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(6), pages 965-977, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanhua Deng & Jiji Wu & Qian Yang & Weizhen Chen & Penghan Li & Chenhao Huang & Jinsong Deng & Biyong Ji & Lijian Xie, 2023. "Life Cycle-Based Carbon Emission Reduction Benefit Assessment of Centralized Photovoltaic Power Plants in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Hassan Saad & Haslinda Nahazanan & Badronnisa Yusuf & Siti Fauziah Toha & Ahmed Alnuaim & Ahmed El-Mouchi & Mohamed Elseknidy & Angham Ali Mohammed, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques and Applications in Soil Improvement Using Green Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-37, June.
    2. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foley, Aoife M. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the ceramics industry: A systematic and critical review of policy options, developments and sociotechnical systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    4. Sher Jahan Khan & Saeed Badghish & Puneet Kaur & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "What motivates the purchasing of green apparel products? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4183-4201, November.
    5. Skaf, Marta & Manso, Juan M. & Aragón, Ángel & Fuente-Alonso, José A. & Ortega-López, Vanesa, 2017. "EAF slag in asphalt mixes: A brief review of its possible re-use," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 176-185.
    6. Filippo G. Praticò & Marinella Giunta & Marina Mistretta & Teresa Maria Gulotta, 2020. "Energy and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Pavement Materials and Technologies for Urban Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Bryce, James & Brodie, Stefanie & Parry, Tony & Lo Presti, Davide, 2017. "A systematic assessment of road pavement sustainability through a review of rating tools," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 108-118.
    8. Hongyu Long & Hongyong Liu & Xingwei Li & Longjun Chen, 2020. "An Evolutionary Game Theory Study for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Considering Green Development Performance under the Chinese Government’s Reward–Penalty Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Paulo Miguel Pereira & Castorina Silva Vieira, 2022. "A Literature Review on the Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials in Unbound Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Cansu İskender & Erol İskender & Atakan Aksoy & Celaleddin Ensar Şengül, 2021. "Effect of Glass Cullet Size and Hydrated Lime—Nanoclay Additives on the Mechanical Properties of Glassphalt Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Güngör KARAKAŞ, 2022. "Factors affecting food waste awareness in Turkey. The case of Corum province," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 271-289, June.
    12. Yunpeng Zhao & Dimitrios Goulias & Magdalena Dobiszewska & Paweł Modrzyński, 2022. "Life-Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Using Rock Dust as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Concrete Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Zhikun Ding & Wanqi Nie & Huanyu Wu, 2022. "Investigating the connection between stakeholders’ purchase intention and perceived value of construction and demolition waste recycled products," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9285-9303, July.
    14. Youli Lin & Farshid Maghool & Arul Arulrajah & Suksun Horpibulsuk, 2021. "Engineering Characteristics and Environmental Risks of Utilizing Recycled Aluminum Salt Slag and Recycled Concrete as a Sustainable Geomaterial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Feng Ma & Aimin Sha & Panpan Yang & Yue Huang, 2016. "The Greenhouse Gas Emission from Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Zentar, Rachid & Dubois, Vincent & Abriak, Nor Edine, 2008. "Mechanical behaviour and environmental impacts of a test road built with marine dredged sediments," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 947-954.
    17. Primož Jelušič & Süleyman Gücek & Bojan Žlender & Cahit Gürer & Rok Varga & Tamara Bračko & Murat V. Taciroğlu & Burak E. Korkmaz & Şule Yarcı & Borut Macuh, 2023. "Potential of Using Waste Materials in Flexible Pavement Structures Identified by Optimization Design Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Feng Ma & Aimin Sha & Ruiyu Lin & Yue Huang & Chao Wang, 2016. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Asphalt Pavement Construction: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Lin, Chitsan & Huang, Chun-Lan & Shern, Chien-Chuan, 2008. "Recycling waste tire powder for the recovery of oil spills," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1162-1166.
    20. Ecem Nur Barisoglu & Jannes Meeusen & Diederik Snoeck & Ramiro Daniel Verástegui-Flores & Gemmina Di Emidio, 2023. "Feasibility of Using Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials for Deep Soil Mixing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12642-:d:1221606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.