IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8274-d1150649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of Urban Ecosystem Service Value and a Scenario Analysis Based on Land Utilization Changes: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yizhou Wu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zichun Huang

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Dan Han

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiaoli Qiu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yaxin Pan

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Simulating the change in ecosystem service values (ESVs) caused by land use changes in metropolitan areas under multiple scenarios is of great significance to ensure regional ecological security and sustainable urban development. This study assessed the variations in land use and ESV in the main urban area of Hangzhou, China, from 2000 to 2020. A total of four future land use scenarios for 2030 were created using the cellular automata–Markov prediction model and ESVs were calculated for four future scenarios. The results are as follows: (1) Arable land and construction land were the most drastic types of land use changes in the main urban area of Hangzhou during the study period. From 2000 to 2020, construction land in the main urban area of Hangzhou expanded rapidly, with an increase of 46,916.82 hm 2 , while the cultivated land area decreased significantly by 38,396.43 hm 2 . (2) The ESV in the study area continuously declined from 2000 to 2020, with high-value ecosystem service areas predominantly found in forest areas and water areas. (3) The values of ecosystem services under the simulated future scenarios of natural development, rapid development, planned development, and ecological development were CNY 15.053, 14.525, 16.690, and 16.799 billion, respectively. The planned development and ecological development scenarios effectively ensure a high ESV. The results indicated that balancing various types of land use is essential to guarantee ecological security in urban development. Moreover, urban development and construction should be undertaken in areas with a low ESV. This forecasting study can serve as a key reference for policy makers regarding the urban landscape sustainability of Hangzhou City. The integrated simulation method of land use and ESV proposed in this study can shed light on the urban spatial layout and spatial regulation in urban land use planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizhou Wu & Zichun Huang & Dan Han & Xiaoli Qiu & Yaxin Pan, 2023. "Evolution of Urban Ecosystem Service Value and a Scenario Analysis Based on Land Utilization Changes: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8274-:d:1150649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan-Bin Cai & Hui-Min Li & Xin-Yue Ye & Hao Zhang, 2016. "Analyzing Three-Decadal Patterns of Land Use/Land Cover Change and Regional Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Level: Case Study of Two Coastal Metropolitan Regions, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Guoyi Zhang & Yan Lu, 2012. "Bias-corrected random forests in regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 151-160, March.
    4. Abera Assefa Biratu & Bobe Bedadi & Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot & Assefa M. Melesse & Tilahun Hordofa Nebi & Wuletawu Abera & Lulseged Tamene & Anthony Egeru, 2022. "Impact of Landscape Management Scenarios on Ecosystem Service Values in Central Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Lamthai Asanok & Torlarp Kamyo & Monthon Norsaengsri & Teeka Yotapakdee & Suwit Navakam, 2021. "Assessment of the Diversity of Large Tree Species in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas along the Chao Phraya River Rim, Central Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Chen, Wanxu & Chi, Guangqing, 2022. "Urbanization and ecosystem services: The multi-scale spatial spillover effects and spatial variations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Dan Xu & Zhuang Cai & Di Xu & Wenpeng Lin & Jun Gao & Lubing Li, 2022. "Land Use Change and Ecosystem Health Assessment on Shanghai–Hangzhou Bay, Eastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bingyi Wang & Tong Chen & Wangbing Liu, 2023. "Accounting for the Logic and Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Comprehensive Value of Cultivated Land around Big Cities: Empirical Evidence Based on 35 Counties in the Hefei Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Xiaoyan Hong & Qingxia Peng & Rongrong Zheng & Wenxiong Lin & Shuisheng Fan & Kai Su, 2024. "Evaluating the Spatial Evolution of the Eco-Economy Harmony in Anxi County, China, Based on Ecosystem Services Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuchen Peng & Qiaolin Luan & Changsheng Xiong, 2023. "Evaluation of Spatial Functions and Scale Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space in Hainan Island," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Ehsan Moradi & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Enric Terol & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Alexandre Marco da Silva & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Hassan Khosravi & Manuel Pulido Fernández & Artemi Cerdà, 2020. "Quantifying Soil Compaction in Persimmon Orchards Using ISUM (Improved Stock Unearthing Method) and Core Sampling Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jingjing Liu & Jing Wang & Tianlin Zhai & Zehui Li, 2022. "The Response of Ecologically Functional Land to Changes in Urban Economic Growth and Transportation Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Carlos Rosero & Xosé Otero & Cinthya Bravo & Catherine Frey, 2023. "Multitemporal Incidence of Landscape Fragmentation in a Protected Area of Central Andean Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Rong Wang & Jinlong Wang & Wenhao Chen, 2023. "The Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Farming Household Livelihood Security: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Hualin Xie & Zhe Li & Yu Xu, 2022. "Study on the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) and Regional Economic System: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Min Zhang & Yan Qiu & Chunling Li & Tao Cui & Mingxing Yang & Jun Yan & Wu Yang, 2023. "A Habitable Earth and Carbon Neutrality: Mission and Challenges Facing Resources and the Environment in China—An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-35, January.
    9. Zhengsong Lin & Xinyue Ye & Qian Wei & Fan Xin & Zhang Lu & Sonali Kudva & Qiwen Dai, 2017. "Ecosystem Services Value Assessment and Uneven Development of the Qingjiang River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Fang Shi & Mingshi Li, 2021. "Assessing Land Cover and Ecological Quality Changes under the New-Type Urbanization from Multi-Source Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Mingjie Shi & Hongqi Wu & Xin Fan & Hongtao Jia & Tong Dong & Panxing He & Muhammad Fahad Baqa & Pingan Jiang, 2021. "Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Ecosystem Services for Different Land Use Scenarios in the Yili River Valley, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Mengting Dong & Zeyuan Liu & Xiufeng Ni & Zhulin Qi & Jinnan Wang & Qingyu Zhang, 2023. "Re-Evaluating the Value of Ecosystem Based on Carbon Benefit: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Nairong Tan & Xiaoying Chang & Tao Ma, 2023. "Study on Production–Living–Ecological Function Accounting and Management in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Hongye Li & Yutian Hu & Hao Li & Jinjie Ren & Rujie Shao & Zhicheng Liu, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urbanization on Carbon Storage in the Mega-Urban Agglomeration Area: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Yan-jun Guo & Jie-jie Han & Xi Zhao & Xiao-yan Dai & Hao Zhang, 2020. "Understanding the Role of Optimized Land Use/Land Cover Components in Mitigating Summertime Intra-Surface Urban Heat Island Effect: A Study on Downtown Shanghai, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Jia Geng & Mingsheng Yuan & Shen Xu & Tingting Bai & Yang Xiao & Xiaopeng Li & Dong Xu, 2022. "Urban Expansion Was the Main Driving Force for the Decline in Ecosystem Services in Hainan Island during 1980–2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Suizi Wang & Jiangwen Fan & Haiyan Zhang & Yaxian Zhang & Huajun Fang, 2023. "Harmonizing Population, Grain, and Land: Unlocking Sustainable Land Resource Management in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Jiangang Li & Songhong Li & Jun Lei & Xiaolei Zhang & Jianwei Qi & Buayxam Tohti & Zuliang Duan, 2022. "Analysis of Spatial Structure in the Kashgar Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Weisong Li & Wanxu Chen & Jiaojiao Bian & Jun Xian & Li Zhan, 2022. "Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Services Balance in the Han River Ecological Economic Belt, China: A Multi-Scale Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8274-:d:1150649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.