IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2437-d754073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ Epistemological Assumptions about Educational Inequality in Four Societies: A Holistic Reading Strategy for Examining Sociocultural Epistemologies

Author

Listed:
  • Seung-Hwan Ham

    (Department of Education, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Rae Young Kim

    (Department of Mathematics Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

Abstract

Conventional approaches to analyzing cross-national data on teacher knowledge have often failed to recognize qualitative variations across and within different countries. A dilemma confronted by researchers is how to avoid the essentialization of cultures while benefiting from cultural intuition by attending to general national patterns. If researchers focus on exploring the diverse subjectivities of respondents, they are not likely to observe general national patterns because subtle nuances in meaning make it challenging to deal with data with broad categories. There may be too many subtle meanings. However, if researchers focus on general national patterns, they may lose the hidden scripts of the data, as little attention is paid to nuanced meanings. Our data suggest that a holistic reading approach examining different types of semantic foci can be an alternative method for dealing with such a methodological dilemma. This study provides an illustrative example analysis based on this alternative analytic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung-Hwan Ham & Rae Young Kim, 2022. "Teachers’ Epistemological Assumptions about Educational Inequality in Four Societies: A Holistic Reading Strategy for Examining Sociocultural Epistemologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2437-:d:754073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Arcagni & Marco Fattore & Filomena Maggino & Giorgio Vittadini, 2021. "Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Jie Mi, 1999. "Comparisons of renewable warranties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 91-106, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolson, Natanael & Yutkin, Maxim & Rees, William & Patzek, Tadeusz, 2022. "Resilience rankings and trajectories of world's countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Fredy Calizaya & Luz Gómez & Jorge Zegarra & Melvin Pozo & Carmen Mindani & Cirilo Caira & Elmer Calizaya, 2023. "Unveiling Ancestral Sustainability: A Comprehensive Study of Economic, Environmental, and Social Factors in Potato and Quinoa Cultivation in the Highland Aynokas of Puno, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, September.
    3. M Shafiee & M Finkelstein & S Chukova, 2011. "Burn-in and imperfect preventive maintenance strategies for warranted products," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 211-218, June.
    4. Zhi-Sheng Ye & Loon-Ching Tang & Min Xie, 2014. "Bi-objective burn-in modeling and optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 201-214, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2437-:d:754073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.