IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2341-d752683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Machine Learning Models in Predicting Irrigation Groundwater Quality Indices for Effective Decision Making in Medjerda River Basin, Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma Trabelsi

    (Research Unit Sustainable Management of Water and Soil Resources, Higher School of Engineers of Medjez El Bab (ESIM), University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8189, Tunisia)

  • Salsebil Bel Hadj Ali

    (Research Unit Sustainable Management of Water and Soil Resources, Higher School of Engineers of Medjez El Bab (ESIM), University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8189, Tunisia)

Abstract

Over the last years, the global application of machine learning (ML) models in groundwater quality studies has proved to be a robust alternative tool to produce highly accurate results at a low cost. This research aims to evaluate the ability of machine learning (ML) models to predict the quality of groundwater for irrigation purposes in the downstream Medjerda river basin (DMB) in Tunisia. The random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) models were tested to predict the irrigation quality water parameters (IWQ): total dissolved solids (TDS), potential salinity (PS), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR) through low-cost, in situ physicochemical parameters (T, pH, EC) as input variables. In view of this, seventy-two (72) representative groundwater samples have been collected and analysed for major cations and anions during pre-and post-monsoon seasons of 3 years (2019–2021) to compute IWQ parameters. The performance of the ML models was evaluated according to Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), the root means square error (RMSE), and the relative bias (RBIAS). The model sensitivity analysis was evaluated to identify input parameters that considerably impact the model predictions using the one-factor-at-time (OFAT) method of the Monte Carlo (MC) approach. The results show that the AdaBoost model is the most appropriate model for predicting all parameters (r was ranged between 0.88 and 0.89), while the random forest model is suitable for predicting only four parameters: TDS, PS, SAR, and ESP (r was with 0.65 to 0.87). Added to that, this study found out that the ANN and SVR models perform well in predicting three parameters (TDS, PS, SAR) and two parameters (PS, SAR), respectively, with the most optimal value of generalization ability (GA) close to unity (between 1 and 0.98). Moreover, the results of the uncertainty analysis confirmed the prominent superiority and robustness of the ML models to produce excellent predictions with only a few physicochemical parameters as inputs. The developed ML models are relevant for predicting cost-effective irrigation water quality indices and can be applied as a DSS tool to improve water management in the Medjerda basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma Trabelsi & Salsebil Bel Hadj Ali, 2022. "Exploring Machine Learning Models in Predicting Irrigation Groundwater Quality Indices for Effective Decision Making in Medjerda River Basin, Tunisia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2341-:d:752683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El Bilali, Ali & Taleb, Abdeslam & Brouziyne, Youssef, 2021. "Groundwater quality forecasting using machine learning algorithms for irrigation purposes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Yuan Chang Leong & Brent L. Hughes & Yiyu Wang & Jamil Zaki, 2019. "Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying motivated seeing," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(9), pages 962-973, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Haijiao & Wen, Xiaohu & Wu, Min & Sheng, Danrui & Wu, Jun & Zhao, Ying, 2022. "Data-based groundwater quality estimation and uncertainty analysis for irrigation agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Ahmed Khaled Abdella Ahmed & Mustafa El-Rawy & Amira Mofreh Ibraheem & Nassir Al-Arifi & Mahmoud Khaled Abd-Ellah, 2023. "Forecasting of Groundwater Quality by Using Deep Learning Time Series Techniques in an Arid Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Zhang, Xumin & Khachatryan, Hayk & Gao, Zhifeng, 2020. "Using Mixed Logit Based Models to Control Attribute Nonattendance in Choice Experiments," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304547, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. De Angelis, Paolo & Tuninetti, Marta & Bergamasco, Luca & Calianno, Luca & Asinari, Pietro & Laio, Francesco & Fasano, Matteo, 2021. "Data-driven appraisal of renewable energy potentials for sustainable freshwater production in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Abhinav Kumar Singh & Pankaj Kumar & Rawshan Ali & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma & Kuldeep Singh Kushwaha & Kanhu Charan Panda & Atish Sagar & Ehsan Mirzania & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Alban Ku, 2022. "An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2341-:d:752683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.