IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1712-d740604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Governance at an Asymmetric Border, the Case of the U.S.–Mexico Border Region

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Munoz-Melendez

    (Department of Environmental and Urban Studies, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana 22560, Mexico)

  • Sarah E. Martinez-Pellegrini

    (Department of Public Administration Studies, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana 22560, Mexico)

Abstract

Environmental issues at the U.S.–Mexico border have been approached in a fragmented way and considered of minor political interest; even though they have been addressed in treaties and agreements, regional environmental pollution persists. One may ask what sort of measures should be taken to address the complex and long-term environmental problems in the U.S.–Mexico border region. To answer this question, an environmental cross-border governance proposal was evaluated by applying Qualitative Analysis of Textual Data to the text of Chapter 24 of the USMCA treaty. The results indicated that the environmental policies concerning the border region still lack a coherent systemic approach, and hence will lead to inefficiency. Territorial development is heavily dependent on national environmental governance and priorities; however, environmental issues should be understood in an integral, complex and deeply entangled way if they are to be effectively addressed. Otherwise, environmental degradation is likely to expand due to population growth and events associated with climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Munoz-Melendez & Sarah E. Martinez-Pellegrini, 2022. "Environmental Governance at an Asymmetric Border, the Case of the U.S.–Mexico Border Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1712-:d:740604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken Conca, 2012. "The Rise of the Region in Global Environmental Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 12(3), pages 127-133, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balsiger, Jörg & Prys, Miriam & Steinhoff, Niko, 2012. "The Nature and Role of Regional Agreements in International Environmental Politics: Mapping Agreements, Outlining Future Research," GIGA Working Papers 208, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Shaw, Christopher & Nerlich, Brigitte, 2015. "Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 34-40.
    3. Harlan Koff & Sandra Häbel, 2022. "Normative coherence for development: What relevance for responsive regionalism?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    4. Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "In our (frozen) backyard: the Eurasian Union and regional environmental governance in the Arctic," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Berna Edoardo Berionni, 2013. "Regionalizzare la tutela dell?ambiente? Verso una sostenibilit? su scala regionale: il caso dell?UE e dell?ASEAN," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 107-128.
    6. Kate J. Neville & Glen Coulthard, 2019. "Transformative Water Relations: Indigenous Interventions in Global Political Economies," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Mark Purdon, 2015. "Advancing Comparative Climate Change Politics: Theory and Method," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Zoe Garbis & Erin McCarthy & Robert W. Orttung & Gregory Poelzer & Melissa Shaiman & Jacob Tafrate, 2023. "Governing the green economy in the Arctic," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Vladislava Vladimirova, 2023. "Regional environmental governance of protected natural territories in the European North: Russia, Finland, and Norway, and the case of Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1712-:d:740604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.