IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p697-d720759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Unbalanced Production Lines Using Simulation Modeling: A Case Study for Solar Silicon Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Chen-Yang Cheng

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Fen Li

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 407224, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Leng Lee

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung 411030, Taiwan)

  • Ranon Jientrakul

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Chumpol Yuangyai

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

Abstract

In the solar silicon manufacturing industry, the production time for crystal growth is ten times longer than at other workstations. The pre-processing time at the ingot-cutting station causes work-in-process (WIP) accumulation and an excessively long cycle time. This study aimed to find the most effective production system for reducing WIP accumulation and shortening the cycle time. The proposed approach considered pull production systems, and the response surface methodology was adopted for performance optimization. A simulation-based optimization technique was used for determining the optimal pull production system. The comparison between the results of various simulated pull production systems and those of the existing solar silicon manufacturing system showed that a hybrid production system in which a kanban station was installed before the bottleneck station with a CONWIP system incorporated for the rest of the production line could reduce the WIP volume by 26% and shorten the cycle time by 16% under the same throughput conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen-Yang Cheng & Shu-Fen Li & Chia-Leng Lee & Ranon Jientrakul & Chumpol Yuangyai, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Unbalanced Production Lines Using Simulation Modeling: A Case Study for Solar Silicon Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:697-:d:720759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Luc Deleersnyder & Thom J. Hodgson & Henri Muller-Malek & Peter J. O'Grady, 1989. "Kanban Controlled Pull Systems: An Analytic Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(9), pages 1079-1091, September.
    2. Richard Conway & William Maxwell & John O. McClain & L. Joseph Thomas, 1988. "The Role of Work-in-Process Inventory in Serial Production Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 229-241, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Subba Rao, S. & Gunasekaran, A. & Goyal, S. K. & Martikainen, T., 1998. "Waiting line model applications in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Wilhelm, W. E. & Som, Pradip, 1998. "Analysis of a single-stage, single-product, stochastic, MRP-controlled assembly system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 74-93, July.
    3. Alfieri, Arianna & Matta, Andrea, 2012. "Mathematical programming formulations for approximate simulation of multistage production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 773-783.
    4. Kim, Ilhyung & Tang, Christopher S., 1997. "Lead time and response time in a pull production control system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 474-485, September.
    5. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2006. "Throughput maximization in serial production lines with worksharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 88-101, February.
    6. Wallace J. Hopp & Eylem Tekin & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2004. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    7. Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo & Chang, Dong-Shang, 2003. "Optimal process control policies under a time-varying cost structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 197-210, August.
    8. Lutz, Christian M. & Roscoe Davis, K. & Sun, Minghe, 1998. "Determining buffer location and size in production lines using tabu search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 301-316, April.
    9. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Incentives for Quality Through Endogenous Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 254-273, July.
    10. Bertazzi, Luca, 2011. "Determining the optimal dimension of a work-in-process storage area," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 483-489, June.
    11. Papadopoulos, H. T. & Vidalis, M. I., 2001. "Minimizing WIP inventory in reliable production lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 185-197, March.
    12. Urban, Timothy L. & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan, 2016. "Designing energy-efficient serial production lines: The unpaced synchronous line-balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 789-801.
    13. Payman Jula & Robert Leachman, 2008. "Coordinating decentralized local schedulers in complex supply chain manufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 123-147, July.
    14. Houmin Yan & Xun Yu Zhou & G. Yin, 1999. "Approximating an Optimal Production Policy in a Continuous Flow Line: Recurrence and Asymptotic Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 535-549, August.
    15. Andijani, A. A. & Anwarul, M., 1997. "Manufacturing blocking discipline: A multi-criterion approach for buffer allocations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 155-163, September.
    16. Erel, Erdal, 1998. "A study on production lines with discrete batch WIP inventory transfer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 71-85, June.
    17. Sabry Shaaban & Rodrigo Romero-Silva, 2021. "Performance of merging lines with uneven buffer capacity allocation: the effects of unreliability under different inventory-related costs," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1253-1288, December.
    18. Zhao Xiaobo & Qiguo Gong & Kenichi Nakashima, 2001. "Analysis of a production system in a general configuration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 128-143, March.
    19. Suliman, S. M. A., 2000. "A mathematical model for a buffered two-stage manufacturing cell with an unreliable transfer device," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 69-81, January.
    20. Askin, Ronald G. & Chen, Jiaqiong, 2006. "Dynamic task assignment for throughput maximization with worksharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 853-869, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:697-:d:720759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.