IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16716-d1002346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Different Machine Learning Methods in Longnan City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangping Gao

    (Geological Hazards Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730099, China)

  • Xiangyang Shi

    (Geological Hazards Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730099, China)

  • Linghui Li

    (Geological Hazards Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730099, China)

  • Ziqiang Zhou

    (Geological Hazards Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730099, China)

  • Junfeng Wang

    (College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

In recent decades, with the increase in extreme climate duration and the continuous development of urbanization in China, the threat of landslide disasters has become increasingly serious. More and more scholars pay attention to the problem of the prevention of landslide disasters. Therefore, the landslide susceptibility prediction is generated, which can play an important role in the design of land development and urban development schemes in mountainous areas. In this paper, the frequency ratio (FR) model is used to quantitatively analyze the relationship between each factor and the occurrence of landslide (elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to faults, rainfall, distance to rivers, soil types, land cover, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and distance to roads). Based on the analysis of landslide distribution, 12 influencing factors were selected to establish the landslide susceptibility evaluation index system. Historical landslide points were randomly divided into training (70% of the total) and validation (30%) sets. Thereafter, decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) models were used to generate the landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), and the predictive performance of the three models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The FR model results showed that landslides mostly occurred at slopes of 0–15°, elevations of <1000 m, distance to rivers of 0–500 m, rainfall of 750–840 mm, NDVI of 0.8–0.9, distance to roads of 0–500 m, distance to faults of 1500–2000 m and transportation land. Our results also showed that the RF model showed a great capability of identifying areas highly susceptible to landslide, and this model had the greatest reliability. High and very high landslide susceptibility was detected for 29.73% of the land area of Longnan City, Gansu Province, mainly in the eastern, northeastern, and southern regions. The importance ranking of the RF model also revealed that elevation, NDVI, distance to roads, and rainfall dominated the spatial distribution of landslides. Our results could help government agencies and decision-makers make wise decisions for future natural hazard prevention in Longnan City.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangping Gao & Xiangyang Shi & Linghui Li & Ziqiang Zhou & Junfeng Wang, 2022. "Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Different Machine Learning Methods in Longnan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16716-:d:1002346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binh Thai Pham & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Ebrahim Omidvar & Sushant K. Singh & Mehebub Sahana & Dawood Talebpour Asl & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Nguyen Kim Quoc & Saro Lee, 2019. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Schumacher, Martin & Ro[ss]ner, Reinhard & Vach, Werner, 1996. "Neural networks and logistic regression: Part I," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 661-682, June.
    3. Deliang Sun & Haijia Wen & Yalan Zhang & Mengmeng Xue, 2021. "An optimal sample selection-based logistic regression model of slope physical resistance against rainfall-induced landslide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 1255-1279, January.
    4. Vach, Werner & Ro[ss]ner, Reinhard & Schumacher, Martin, 1996. "Neural networks and logistic regression: Part II," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 683-701, June.
    5. Haoyuan Hong & Himan Shahabi & Ataollah Shirzadi & Wei Chen & Kamran Chapi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Majid Shadman Roodposhti & Arastoo Yari Hesar & Yingying Tian & Dieu Tien Bui, 2019. "Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 173-212, March.
    6. Kyungjin An & Suyeon Kim & Taebyeong Chae & Daeryong Park, 2018. "Developing an Accessible Landslide Susceptibility Model Using Open-Source Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deborah Simon Mwakapesa & Yimin Mao & Xiaoji Lan & Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using DIvisive ANAlysis (DIANA) and RObust Clustering Using linKs (ROCK) Algorithms, and Comparison of Their Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Ghada Abdulrahman Najjar & Khaled Akkad & Ahdab Hashim Almahdaly, 2023. "Classification of Lighting Design Aspects in Relation to Employees’ Productivity in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viet-Ha Nhu & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Sushant K. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & John J. Clague & Abolfazl Jaafari & Wei Chen & Shaghayegh Miraki & Jie Dou & Chinh Luu & Krzysztof Górski & Binh, 2020. "Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Leo Liberti, 2020. "Distance geometry and data science," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 271-339, July.
    3. Zhang, G. Peter & Keil, Mark & Rai, Arun & Mann, Joan, 2003. "Predicting information technology project escalation: A neural network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 115-129, April.
    4. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Nobilio, Lucia, 1997. "Spatial modal patterns in European freight transport networks: results of neurocomputing and logit models," Serie Research Memoranda 0029, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. H. Pourghasemi & H. Moradi & S. Fatemi Aghda, 2013. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 749-779, October.
    6. Rabiu Muazu Musa & Anwar P. P. Abdul Majeed & Zahari Taha & Siow Wee Chang & Ahmad Fakhri Ab. Nasir & Mohamad Razali Abdullah, 2019. "A machine learning approach of predicting high potential archers by means of physical fitness indicators," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Manojit Chattopadhyay & Subrata Kumar Mitra, 2017. "Applicability and effectiveness of classifications models for achieving the twin objectives of growth and outreach of microfinance institutions," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 451-474, December.
    8. Viet-Ha Nhu & Ayub Mohammadi & Himan Shahabi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ataollah Shirzadi & John J. Clague & Abolfazl Jaafari & Wei Chen & Hoang Nguyen, 2020. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Remote Sensing Data in a Tropical Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Gaudart, Jean & Giusiano, Bernard & Huiart, Laetitia, 2004. "Comparison of the performance of multi-layer perceptron and linear regression for epidemiological data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 547-570, January.
    10. Alex Nosenko & Yuan Cheng & Haiquan Chen, 2023. "Password and Passphrase Guessing with Recurrent Neural Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 549-565, April.
    11. Viet-Tien Nguyen & Trong Hien Tran & Ngoc Anh Ha & Van Liem Ngo & Al-Ansari Nadhir & Van Phong Tran & Huu Duy Nguyen & Malek M. A. & Ata Amini & Indra Prakash & Lanh Si Ho & Binh Thai Pham, 2019. "GIS Based Novel Hybrid Computational Intelligence Models for Mapping Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study at Da Lat City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Marie Lebreton & Katia Melnik, 2009. "Voluntary Participation as a Determinant of Social Capital in France : Allowing for Parameter Heterogeneity," Working Papers halshs-00410530, HAL.
    13. Liulei Bao & Guangcheng Zhang & Xinli Hu & Shuangshuang Wu & Xiangdong Liu, 2021. "Stage Division of Landslide Deformation and Prediction of Critical Sliding Based on Inverse Logistic Function," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Peltonen, Tuomas A., 2006. "Are emerging market currency crises predictable? A test," Working Paper Series 571, European Central Bank.
    15. Jeong-Cheol Kim & Sunmin Lee, 2023. "Comparative Study of Deep Neural Networks for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study of Pyeongchang-gun, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Wentao Yang & Min Deng & Jianbo Tang & Liang Luo, 2023. "Geographically weighted regression with the integration of machine learning for spatial prediction," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 213-236, April.
    17. Binh Thai Pham & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Ebrahim Omidvar & Sushant K. Singh & Mehebub Sahana & Dawood Talebpour Asl & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Nguyen Kim Quoc & Saro Lee, 2019. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Hyung-Sup Jung & Saro Lee & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2020. "Sustainable Applications of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Information Systems to Earth Observations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-6, March.
    19. Schumacher, Martin & Ro[ss]ner, Reinhard & Vach, Werner, 1996. "Neural networks and logistic regression: Part I," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 661-682, June.
    20. Bipin Peethambaran & R. Anbalagan & K. V. Shihabudheen, 2019. "Landslide susceptibility mapping in and around Mussoorie Township using fuzzy set procedure, MamLand and improved fuzzy expert system-A comparative study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 121-147, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16716-:d:1002346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.