IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14620-d965731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Stojanova

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Nina Cvar

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jurij Verhovnik

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Nataša Božić

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jure Trilar

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Andrej Kos

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Emilija Stojmenova Duh

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

One of the possible solutions of rural development is rural Digital Innovation Hubs (DIHs). Rural DIHs represent an efficient way of improving local environments in a more sustainable way, by affecting local businesses, people and local authorities. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept of a rural DIH by exploring the following elements: business model, digital technology and competences, and the policy instrument. We investigate the above-mentioned conceptual elements by conducting a literature review study and synthesizing the findings. Additionally, we provide a case study of the Divina Wine Hub Šmarje as an example of a rural DIH, whose activities are aimed at supporting rural businesses and individuals. The results show that a rural DIH does have a positive impact on local businesses, in particular regarding their sustainability aspect. The local DIH explained in the case study provides possibilities for local businesses to use innovative technological solutions, by supporting them with the right technological equipment and skilled people. From an economic point of view on sustainability, this resulted in business processes optimization, cost reduction, employment opportunities, as well as the strengthening of sustainable consumption and marketing for the winegrowers. Furthermore, it adds to environmental sustainability by adequately assessing the conditions in the vineyards to determine the optimal time and location of effective action, resulting in reducing the environmental footprint. All of this together also contributes to social sustainability by providing fairer distribution of social opportunities and digital inclusion. In this manner, we conclude that rural DIHs should be part of the Smart transformations of rural areas and included in rural development policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14620-:d:965731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Zavratnik & Argene Superina & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2019. "Living Labs for Rural Areas: Contextualization of Living Lab Frameworks, Concepts and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Magda, Sandor & Magda, Robert & Marselek, Sandor, 2009. "Sustainable Development Of The Rural Economy," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 5(5-6), pages 1-6.
    3. Simona Stojanova & Gianluca Lentini & Peter Niederer & Thomas Egger & Nina Cvar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2021. "Smart Villages Policies: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Wong, Pak Kin & Wong, Ka In & Vong, Chi Man & Cheung, Chun Shun, 2015. "Modeling and optimization of biodiesel engine performance using kernel-based extreme learning machine and cuckoo search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 640-647.
    5. Johan Miorner & Annita Kalpaka & Jens Sorvik & Joakim Wernberg, 2019. "Exploring heterogeneous Digital Innovation Hubs in their context," JRC Research Reports JRC117976, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Saeed Nosratabadi & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Andry Rakotonirainy & Kwok Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Alexandre Dubois & Franziska Sielker, 2022. "Digitalization in sparsely populated areas: between place-based practices and the smart region agenda," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 1771-1782, October.
    8. Xinxiang Zhang & Lijun Hu & Manjula Salimath & Ching-Chung Kuo, 2018. "Developing Evaluation Frameworks for Business Models in China’s Rural Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Roberta Cuel & Gabriella Maria Cangelosi, 2020. "In Vino Veritas? Blockchain Preliminary Effects on Italian Wine SMEs," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Rocco Agrifoglio & Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini & Francesca Ricciardi (ed.), Digital Business Transformation, pages 301-314, Springer.
    10. Edward E Leamer & Michael Storper, 2001. "The Economic Geography of the Internet Age," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(4), pages 641-665, December.
    11. Veronika Zavratnik & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2018. "Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Veronika Zavratnik & Dan Podjed & Jure Trilar & Nina Hlebec & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2020. "Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Bouwman, Harry & Nikou, Shahrokh & de Reuver, Mark, 2019. "Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9).
    14. David Lagakos & Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak & Michael E. Waugh, 2023. "The Welfare Effects of Encouraging Rural–Urban Migration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 803-837, May.
    15. Christina Rundel & Koen Salemink, 2021. "Hubs, hopes and high stakes for a relatively disadvantaged low tech place," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 650-668, November.
    16. Viriya Taecharungroj & Morakot Muthuta & Pheereeya Boonchaiyapruek, 2019. "Sustainability as a place brand position: a resident-centric analysis of the ten towns in the vicinity of Bangkok," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 210-228, December.
    17. Salemink, Koen & Strijker, Dirk, 2018. "The participation society and its inability to correct the failure of market players to deliver adequate service levels in rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 757-765.
    18. Nino Adamashvili & Radu State & Caterina Tricase & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2021. "Blockchain-Based Wine Supply Chain for the Industry Advancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Cormac Walsh, 2012. "Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 493-496.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gómez-Carmona, Oihane & Buján-Carballal, David & Casado-Mansilla, Diego & López-de-Ipiña, Diego & Cano-Benito, Juan & Cimmino, Andrea & Poveda-Villalón, María & García-Castro, Raúl & Almela-Miralles, , 2023. "Mind the gap: The AURORAL ecosystem for the digital transformation of smart communities and rural areas," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Iwona Józefowicz & Hanna Michniewicz-Ankiersztajn, 2023. "Digital Tools for Water Resource Management as a Part of a Green Economy in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability within Attaining Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Digitalization and the Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgenia Anastasiou & Stella Manika & Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Katsios, 2021. "Territorial and Human Geography Challenges: How Can Smart Villages Support Rural Development and Population Inclusion?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Ping Zhang & Weiwei Li & Kaixu Zhao & Yi Zhao & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "The Impact Factors and Management Policy of Digital Village Development: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Muhammad Yusuf, 2023. "Village Open Data Implementation: Lesson Learned from Alang-alang Vilalge, Madura," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 11-17.
    5. Sylwia Barwicka & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "The “Perfect Village” Model as a Result of Research on Transformation of Plant Cover—Case Study of the Puchaczów Commune," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Eliza Nichifor & Radu Constantin Lixăndroiu & Silvia Sumedrea & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Gabriel Brătucu, 2021. "How Can SMEs Become More Sustainable? Modelling the M-Commerce Consumer Behaviour with Contingent Free Shipping and Customer Journey’s Touchpoints Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Cristina García Fernández & Daniël Peek, 2023. "Connecting the Smart Village: A Switch towards Smart and Sustainable Rural-Urban Linkages in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2022. "National Investment Framework for Revitalizing the R&D Collaborative Ecosystem of Sustainable Smart Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, May.
    9. Igor Calzada, 2023. "Smart Rural Communities: Action Research in Colombia and Mozambique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Weiwei Li & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "The Evolution Model of and Factors Influencing Digital Villages: Evidence from Guangxi, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Vaidehi Pathak & Sameer Deshkar, 2023. "Transitions towards Sustainable and Resilient Rural Areas in Revitalising India: A Framework for Localising SDGs at Gram Panchayat Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & Lourdes Pérez, 2022. "(Re)thinking smart in rural contexts: A multi‐country study," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 868-889, June.
    13. Łukasz Satoła & Anna Milewska, 2022. "The Concept of a Smart Village as an Innovative Way of Implementing Public Tasks in the Era of Instability on the Energy Market—Examples from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Simona Stojanova & Gianluca Lentini & Peter Niederer & Thomas Egger & Nina Cvar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2021. "Smart Villages Policies: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Navío-Marco, Julio & Rodrigo-Moya, Beatriz & Gerli, Paolo, 2020. "The rising importance of the "Smart territory" concept: definition and implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Bojana Malisic & Nemanja Misic & Srdjan Krco & Aleksandra Martinovic & Sandra Tinaj & Tomo Popovic, 2023. "Blockchain Adoption in the Wine Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Wu Zhao & Zhiye Liang & Binrong Li, 2022. "Realizing a Rural Sustainable Development through a Digital Village Construction: Experiences from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Pengyu Zhu, 2013. "Telecommuting, Household Commute and Location Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2441-2459, September.
    19. Diego Marino Fages, 2023. "Migration and trust: Evidence on assimilation from internal migrants," Discussion Papers 2023-08, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    20. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14620-:d:965731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.