IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14239-d959475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness and Expectations of Polish Consumers Regarding Edible Niche Oils as a Food Product

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Czwartkowski

    (Department of Production and Labor Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Wierzbic

    (Department of Production and Labor Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Wojciech Golimowski

    (Department of Agroengineering and Quality Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandroska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Despite their nutritional value and increasing supply of oils from unconventional plants to the oil industry, edible niche oils do not have high sales. The market for niche oils is geared toward an ever-growing volume of conscious consumers distinguished by their sensitivity to product quality, packaging type, price, sourcing technology, and variety of product use. In the literature, there is a lack of research on consumer preferences and expectations of niche oils. This article continues a series of studies on niche oils aimed at determining the proper technological parameters for production, discussing the economic aspects of niche oil production, and researching consumer behavior concerning these products. It aims to determine Polish consumers’ awareness and expectations of edible niche oils, select the oils of most significant interest to consumers, and determine the factors influencing consumers’ propensity to try edible niche oils. The survey, in the form of a questionnaire, was conducted using the CAWI method on a representative sample of 1000 Polish consumers. Consumers were divided into four segments: those who regularly consume niche oils, consumers who have experience with niche oils, consumers who are familiar with them but have not tried them, and consumers who do not know niche oils. Data were analyzed collectively and separately for each segment using one-way ANOVA. Grape seed oils and edible castor oil are the most interesting to consumers. Consumers’ purchasing decisions are influenced by price, nutrient content, and sustainable production free of GMO products and harmful chemicals. Therefore, manufacturers should increase the availability of certain oils (e.g., peanut oil). Sensory qualities, place of production, and brand recognition are secondary selection criteria. Future research should focus on the organoleptic evaluation of products available on the market. Research results may be used to create production and marketing strategies to make niche oils more attractive to consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Awareness and Expectations of Polish Consumers Regarding Edible Niche Oils as a Food Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14239-:d:959475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo Corallo & Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Alessandra Spennato, 2019. "A Survey to Discover Current Food Choice Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Anda Fridrihsone & Francesco Romagnoli & Ugis Cabulis, 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Rapeseed and Rapeseed Oil Produced in Northern Europe: A Latvian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Giulia Sesini & Cinzia Castiglioni & Edoardo Lozza, 2020. "New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Yi-Chih Lee, 2021. "Replacing Work with Study: A Sustainable Development Strategy for Economically or Culturally Disadvantaged Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Li Bai & Mingliang Wang & Shunlong Gong, 2019. "Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Purchases: The Important Roles of Beliefs, Subjective Norms, and Identity Expressiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Souleymane Zio & Yves Traore & Aly Savadogo & Hama Cisse & Oumarou Zongo & Flibert Guira & Francois Tapsoba & Siourime Somda & Fatoumata Hama-Ba & Laurencia Toulsoumde Songre-Ouattara & Cheikna Zongo, 2020. "The Oils Refining Process and Contaminants in Edible Oils: A Review," Journal of Food Technology Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 9-47.
    7. Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Quality, Key Production Factors, and Consumption Volume of Niche Edible Oils Marketed in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Mattia Rapa & Salvatore Ciano & Andrea Rocchi & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Roberto Ruggieri & Giuliana Vinci, 2019. "Hempseed Oil Quality Parameters: Optimization of Sustainable Methods by Miniaturization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Moser, Riccarda & Raffaelli, Roberta & Thilmany, Dawn D., 2011. "Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables with Credence-Based Attributes: A Review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Gratiela Dana Boca, 2021. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Maramures County, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Hoskins, Jake D., 2020. "The evolving role of hit and niche products in brick-and-mortar retail category assortment planning: A large-scale empirical investigation of U.S. consumer packaged goods," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Mario Pagliacci & Adriana Manolica & Teodora Roman & Gabriela Boldureanu, 2019. "The Consumers of Green Products. The Case of Romanian Moldavia Counties," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 830-830, November.
    13. Agnieszka Sagan & Agata Blicharz-Kania & Marek Szmigielski & Dariusz Andrejko & Paweł Sobczak & Kazimierz Zawiślak & Agnieszka Starek, 2019. "Assessment of the Properties of Rapeseed Oil Enriched with Oils Characterized by High Content of α-linolenic Acid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Quality, Key Production Factors, and Consumption Volume of Niche Edible Oils Marketed in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Gratiela Dana Boca, 2021. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Maramures County, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Giuseppina Migliore & Giuseppina Rizzo & Giorgio Schifani & Giuseppe Quatrosi & Luigi Vetri & Riccardo Testa, 2021. "Ethnocentrism Effects on Consumers’ Behavior during COVID-19 Pandemic," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Salvatore Ciano & S?verine Goscinny & Giuliana Vinci, 2020. "Hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.): Sustainability and challenges for the food sector," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 179-194.
    5. Sharifi, Roya & Kheiri, Bahram & Ghofrani, Yalda Rahmati, 2021. "Presenting the Behavioral Model of Real Buyers of Organic Products in Guilan Province," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 11(2), June.
    6. Dávid Szakos & László Ózsvári & Gyula Kasza, 2020. "Perception of Older Adults about Health-Related Functionality of Foods Compared with Other Age Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Dominic Lemken & Mandy Knigge & Stephan Meyerding & Achim Spiller, 2017. "The Value of Environmental and Health Claims on New Legume Products: A Non-Hypothetical Online Auction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Vesselin Blagoev & Elena Shustova & Inna Mischenko, 2021. "Buyer Behaviour in the Case of Organic Agricultural Products," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 124-139.
    9. Ildikó Kovács & Marietta Balázsné Lendvai & Judit Beke, 2022. "The Importance of Food Attributes and Motivational Factors for Purchasing Local Food Products: Segmentation of Young Local Food Consumers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Seung-hye Jung & Joon-ho Kim & Ha-na Cho & Hae-won Lee & Hyun-ju Choi, 2021. "Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Azucena Gracia & Miguel I. Gómez, 2020. "Food Sustainability and Waste Reduction in Spain: Consumer Preferences for Local, Suboptimal, And/Or Unwashed Fresh Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Anna Birgitte Milford & Nina Trandem & Armando José Garcia Pires, 2021. "Fear of pesticide residues and preference for domestically produced strawberries," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 369-391, December.
    14. Iulia C. Muresan & Rezhen Harun & Felix H. Arion & Anca Monica Brata & Ioan Aurel Chereches & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Diana E. Dumitras & Camelia F. Oroian & Olivia Paula Tirpe, 2021. "Consumers’ Attitude towards Sustainable Food Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Milford, Anna & Lien, Gudbrand & Reed, Matthew, 2021. "Different Sales Channels for Different Farmers: Local and Mainstream Marketing of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in Norway," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315058, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Luigi Cembalo & Alessia Lombardi & Stefano Pascucci & Domenico Dentoni & Giuseppina Migliore & Fabio Verneau & Giorgio Schifani, 2015. "“Rationally Local”: Consumer Participation in Alternative Food Chains," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 330-352, June.
    17. Greta Castellini & Mariarosaria Savarese & Cinzia Castiglioni & Guendalina Graffigna, 2020. "Organic Food Consumption in Italy: The Role of Subjective Relevance of Food as Mediator between Organic Food Choice Motivation and Frequency of Organic Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Piotr Kulyk & Mariola Michalowska & Lukasz Augustowski, 2020. "Sustainable Consumption in the Market of Food Production: The Case of Lubuskie Voivodeship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 225-240.
    19. Molaie, Mir Majid & Lee, Wonjae, 2022. "Economic corollaries of personalized recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Carlos Eduardo Lourenco & Nadine Marques Nunes-Galbes & Riccardo Borgheresi & Luciana Oranges Cezarino & Flavio Pinheiro Martins & Lara Bartocci Liboni, 2022. "Psychological Barriers to Sustainable Dietary Patterns: Findings from Meat Intake Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14239-:d:959475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.