IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12837-d936494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost–Benefit Analysis of Introducing Custom-Made Small Thermal-Frictional Sterilization System to the Existing Hospital Waste Disposal System: A Case Study of Chinese Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Jia

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Wenhao Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Lvjiang Yin

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China
    Shiyan Industry Technique Academy of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Jin Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Antony Mutua Nzioka

    (R&D Institute, Silla Entech Co., Ltd., E&C Innobiz Tower 559, Dalseo-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42709, Korea
    Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daehak-ro 80, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea)

  • Caozheng Yan

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China
    Shiyan Industry Technique Academy of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 167 Checheng West Road, Shiyan 442002, China
    Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daehak-ro 80, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea)

Abstract

This manuscript proposes an integrated system for treating hospital solid waste (H.S.W.) consisting of an incineration and frictional sterilization system capable of operating during normal and emergency situations. We analyzed the benefits of integrating different hospital solid waste (H.S.W.) treatment systems with the existing stand-alone incineration system, with a particular emphasis on the thermal friction sterilization integration system. The objective was to define the economic advantages and benefits in terms of resources recovery of using the thermal frictional sterilization–incineration integrated system during the hospital’s normal and emergency/pandemic operating conditions. We modeled three modeling scenarios based on normal and emergency operating conditions. The results show that the H.S.W. was composed of 74% general H.S.W. Existing incineration systems would be the most expensive process because the sanitary transportation cost represented approximately 96% of the H.S.W. costs. The hospital would realize 40–61% savings relative to the existing method if the integrated incineration–frictional systems were implemented to treat 50–70% of H.S.W.; the savings were better than in other scenarios. Proposed scenario 3 had a much better resources recovery factor than scenarios 1 and 2. This modeling study showed that a thermal frictional sterilization–incineration system could work well even under emergency conditions if the H.S.W. in-house sorting/transportation/storage process is modified to cater to other H.S.W. treatment/sterilization systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Jia & Wenhao Wang & Lvjiang Yin & Jin Liu & Antony Mutua Nzioka & Caozheng Yan, 2022. "Cost–Benefit Analysis of Introducing Custom-Made Small Thermal-Frictional Sterilization System to the Existing Hospital Waste Disposal System: A Case Study of Chinese Hospital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12837-:d:936494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2020. "Assessment of COVID-19 Waste Flows During the Emergency State in Romania and Related Public Health and Environmental Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Min Su & Qiang Wang & Rongrong Li, 2021. "How to Dispose of Medical Waste Caused by COVID-19? A Case Study of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Georgios Giakoumakis & Dorothea Politi & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2021. "Medical Waste Treatment Technologies for Energy, Fuels, and Materials Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thobile Zikhathile & Harrison Atagana & Joseph Bwapwa & David Sawtell, 2022. "A Review of the Impact That Healthcare Risk Waste Treatment Technologies Have on the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Lynda Andeobu & Santoso Wibowo & Srimannarayana Grandhi, 2022. "Medical Waste from COVID-19 Pandemic—A Systematic Review of Management and Environmental Impacts in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Iasmina Petrovici & Mihaela Ionica & Octavian C. Neagoe, 2021. "Economic Crisis: A Factor for the Delayed Diagnosis of Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Peng Jiang & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Yee Van Fan & Xiuju Fu & Yong Mong Bee, 2021. "More Is Not Enough: A Deeper Understanding of the COVID-19 Impacts on Healthcare, Energy and Environment Is Crucial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Yin Ting Chu & Jianzhao Zhou & Yuan Wang & Yue Liu & Jingzheng Ren, 2023. "Current State, Development and Future Directions of Medical Waste Valorization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Georgios Marinos & Dimitrios Lamprinos & Panagiotis Georgakopoulos & Evangelos Oikonomou & Georgios Zoumpoulis & Nikolaos Garmpis & Anna Garmpi & Eirini Tzalavara & Gerasimos Siasos & Georgios Rachiot, 2022. "Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Related to Self-Testing Procedure against COVID-19 among Greek Students: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Tushar, Saifur Rahman & Alam, Md. Fahim Bin & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & Karmaker, Chitra Lekha, 2023. "Assessing the challenges to medical waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for the environmental sustainability in the emerging economies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    8. Patricia Bostan & Cristina Lazar & Ionel Bostan, 2023. "Transition of Medical Waste Management (MWM) from Romania to the Circular Economy Paradigm: Expectations and Objective Limits," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 34-41, August.
    9. Anastasios Sepetis & Paraskevi N. Zaza & Fotios Rizos & Pantelis G. Bagos, 2022. "Identifying and Predicting Healthcare Waste Management Costs for an Optimal Sustainable Management System: Evidence from the Greek Public Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Shuwen Zhao & Guojian Ma & Juan Ding, 2023. "Symbiotic Mechanism of Multiple Subjects for the Resource-Based Disposal of Medical Waste in China in the Post-Pandemic Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Aianna Rios Magalhães Véras e Silva & Bruna de Freitas Iwata & Maria do Socorro Ferreira dos Santos & José Machado Moita Neto, 2023. "Impacts and Regulations of Healthcare Solid Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Ziyuan Liu & Zhi Li & Weiming Chen & Yunpu Zhao & Hanxun Yue & Zhenzhen Wu, 2020. "Path Optimization of Medical Waste Transport Routes in the Emergent Public Health Event of COVID-19: A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Based on the Immune–Ant Colony Algorithm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12837-:d:936494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.