IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11107-d907497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Pig Slurry Application Techniques on Soil CO 2 , N 2 O, and NH 3 Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Eszter Tóth

    (Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Márton Dencső

    (Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
    Doctoral School of Environmental Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. Promenade 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ágota Horel

    (Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
    National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Security, Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Béla Pirkó

    (Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Zsófia Bakacsi

    (Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
    National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Security, Institute for Soil Sciences, Centre for Agricultural Research, Herman O. St. 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural soils can accelerate climate change, therefore, different soil fertilization techniques should be assessed before application to reduce GHG emissions. Pig slurry applications can greatly influence soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions of arable fields; thus, it is important to find site-specific techniques to lessen any negative environmental impacts. In this study, we examined the short-term effect of pig slurry application techniques of spreading and injection on soil greenhouse gas and NH 3 emissions under different irrigation amounts. We used the dynamic chamber method with in-situ gas analyzers. Our study showed that there were elevated emissions during the first week after slurry application; however, the difference between GHG emissions of spreading and injection treatments were not significant. Elevated GHG emissions (213–338% and 250–594% in the case of CO 2 and N 2 O emissions, respectively) were observed under dry circumstances compared to irrigated treatments, as well as significantly higher NH 3 emissions occurred for surface spreading under non-irrigated (dry) circumstances compared to other treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the soil chemistry of different application techniques. However, pig slurry increased the available nitrogen forms (ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen), which caused N 2 O and NH 3 peaks regardless of treatment type. Leachate chemistry was more affected by irrigation strategies than application techniques. Our study highlights the importance of soil conditions at the time of application, rather than the application technique for fertilization using pig slurry.

Suggested Citation

  • Eszter Tóth & Márton Dencső & Ágota Horel & Béla Pirkó & Zsófia Bakacsi, 2022. "Influence of Pig Slurry Application Techniques on Soil CO 2 , N 2 O, and NH 3 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11107-:d:907497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Yanjie & Ji, Yanzhi & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Qiao & Han, Jian & Zhang, Lijuan, 2022. "Effects of water and nitrogen management on N2O emissions and NH3 volatilization from a vineyard in North China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Zhu & Ruiquan Qiao & Rui Jiang, 2022. "Modelling of Water and Nitrogen Flow in a Rain-Fed Ridge-Furrow Maize System with Plastic Mulch," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11107-:d:907497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.