IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11102-d907367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decomposition of Rapeseed Green Manure and Its Effect on Soil under Two Residue Return Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Wang

    (College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    Hunan Branch of National Oilseed Crops Improvement Center, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Hua Ma

    (College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    Hunan Branch of National Oilseed Crops Improvement Center, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Chunyun Guan

    (College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    Hunan Branch of National Oilseed Crops Improvement Center, Changsha 410128, China
    Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Mei Guan

    (College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    Hunan Branch of National Oilseed Crops Improvement Center, Changsha 410128, China
    Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Changsha 410128, China)

Abstract

The overuse of chemical fertilizers has caused various ecological problems in China, necessitating the development of organic alternative fertilizers. There are few studies on the rapidly emerging organic fertilizer rapeseed green manure, despite the importance of understanding its decomposition efficiency and impact on soil. In this study, using plant residue from 14 rapeseed cultivars, we examined the 30-day decomposition changes under conditions A and B (150 and 300 g of plant residue returned, respectively) and detected the effects of their decomposition on soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and microorganisms. Under condition B, the 30-day cumulative decomposition and nutrient release rates of rapeseed were higher than those under condition A, and the rapeseed decomposition rate exceeded 50% under both conditions, which is similar to results in legume green fertilizers. Moreover, the decomposition of rapeseed green manure significantly increased the soil nutrient content and effectively improved the soil bacterial community structure and diversity relative to the original soil, especially under condition B. Thiobacillus , Azotobacter , and Pseudomonas are bacteria that responded to plant decomposition, and the abundance of the three bacterial genera after plant decomposition was significantly correlated with the plant decomposition traits and soil nutrient content. In conclusion, rapeseed green manure has potential to offset the use of chemical fertilizers, promoting sustainable agricultural development, and this study provides a reference for such green fertilization measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Wang & Hua Ma & Chunyun Guan & Mei Guan, 2022. "Decomposition of Rapeseed Green Manure and Its Effect on Soil under Two Residue Return Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11102-:d:907367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aurelio Ortiz & Estibaliz Sansinenea, 2022. "The Role of Beneficial Microorganisms in Soil Quality and Plant Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Hao Cheng & Xiang Liu & Qingrui Xiao & Fan Zhang & Nian Liu & Lizi Tang & Jing Wang & Xiaokang Ma & Bie Tan & Jiashun Chen & Xianren Jiang, 2022. "Rapeseed Meal and Its Application in Pig Diet: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Dandan Song & Yuanquan Cui & Dalong Ma & Xin Li & Lin Liu, 2022. "Spatial Variation of Microbial Community Structure and Its Driving Environmental Factors in Two Forest Types in Permafrost Region of Greater Xing′an Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Xuesong Zhan & Chaofeng Shao & Rong He & Rongguang Shi, 2021. "Evolution and Efficiency Assessment of Pesticide and Fertiliser Inputs to Cultivated Land in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Leonard Ntakirutimana & Fuduo Li & Xianlei Huang & Shu Wang & Changbin Yin, 2019. "Green Manure Planting Incentive Measures of Local Authorities and Farmers’ Perceptions of the Utilization of Rotation Fallow for Sustainable Agriculture in Guangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dickson Mgangathweni Mazibuko & Hiroko Gono & Sarvesh Maskey & Hiromu Okazawa & Lameck Fiwa & Hidehiko Kikuno & Tetsu Sato, 2023. "The Sustainable Niche for Vegetable Production within the Contentious Sustainable Agriculture Discourse: Barriers, Opportunities and Future Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Li & Huina Liu & Wei-Yew Chang & Chun Wang, 2023. "Factors Affecting Farmers’ Environment-Friendly Fertilization Behavior in China: Synthesizing the Evidence Using Meta-Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Juan Diego Valenzuela-Cobos & Fabricio Guevara-Viejó & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2023. "Eco-Friendly Biocontrol of Moniliasis in Ecuadorian Cocoa Using Biplot Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Fanghua Li & Wei Liang & Dungang Zang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Yinying Duan, 2022. "Does Cleaner Household Energy Promote Agricultural Green Production? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Luigi Russi & Gianpiero Marconi & Nicoletta Ferradini & Beatrice Farda & Marika Pellegrini & Loretta Pace, 2022. "Investigating Population Genetic Diversity and Rhizosphere Microbiota of Central Apennines’ Artemisia eriantha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Zilu Zhao & Bo Li, 2022. "Beyond a Spray: Pesticide Application Management in Rural China Based on Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Feixiao Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Quality of Agricultural Products in Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Binglu Wu & Di Mu & Yi Luo & Zhengguang Xiao & Jilong Zhao & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Ecological Problems in China from 2013 to 2022: A Review of Research Hotspots, Geographical Distribution, and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Silin Chen & Xiangyu Guo, 2024. "Analysis of the Club Convergence and Driving Factors of China’s Green Agricultural Development Levels," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Wei Li & Yanpeng Wei & Jiale Zhao & Weiye Han & Ding Li & Jianzhong Wang & Mengfei Zhao & Lin Chen & Limei Chen & Lina Zhou, 2023. "Effects of Fertilization Mode on the Growth of Lactuca sativa L. and Soil Nutrients in Facilitated Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Ionela Cătălina Vasilachi & Vasile Stoleru & Maria Gavrilescu, 2023. "Analysis of Heavy Metal Impacts on Cereal Crop Growth and Development in Contaminated Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-50, October.
    11. Lin Liu & Zhongliang Wang & Dalong Ma & Man Zhang & Lingyu Fu, 2022. "Diversity and Distribution Characteristics of Soil Microbes across Forest–Peatland Ecotones in the Permafrost Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Sebsib Ababor & Metekia Tamiru & Ashraf Alkhtib & Jane Wamatu & Chala G. Kuyu & Tilahun A. Teka & Lemlem Arega Terefe & Emily Burton, 2023. "The Use of Biologically Converted Agricultural Byproducts in Chicken Nutrition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Yuanhe Yu & Liang Wang & Jinkuo Lin & Zijun Li, 2022. "Optimizing Agricultural Input and Production for Different Types of at-Risk Peasant Households: An Empirical Study of Typical Counties in the Yimeng Mountain Area of Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Guangchun Xu & Dongdong Yan & Wensheng Fang & Dejin Xu & Lu Xu & Qiuxia Wang & Aocheng Cao, 2023. "Synergistic Effect of Orange Oil Adjuvant on Acetamiprid in the Control of Edentatipsylla shanghaiensis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Tianyi Cai & Xinhuan Zhang & Fuqiang Xia & Danni Lu, 2022. "Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Fernando Almeida-García & Sara Lago-Olveira & Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva & Sara González-García & María Teresa Moreira & Benigno Ruíz-Nogueiras & Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo, 2022. "Growing Triticum aestivum Landraces in Rotation with Lupinus albus and Fallow Reduces Soil Depletion and Minimises the Use of Chemical Fertilisers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Jing Ren & Fuduo Li & Changbin Yin & Jiudong Zhang, 2022. "Uncovering the Deviation of Farmers’ Green Manure Planting Willingness and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Dickson Mgangathweni Mazibuko & Hiroko Gono & Sarvesh Maskey & Hiromu Okazawa & Lameck Fiwa & Hidehiko Kikuno & Tetsu Sato, 2023. "The Sustainable Niche for Vegetable Production within the Contentious Sustainable Agriculture Discourse: Barriers, Opportunities and Future Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11102-:d:907367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.