IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10377-d893327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Instrumental and Emotional Supports for Sustainability and Social Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Canedo-García

    (Department of Psychology, Sociology and Philosophy, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez

    (Department of Psychology, Sociology and Philosophy, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain)

Abstract

The prevalence of instrumental and emotional support received was investigated, and several psychosocial characteristics were studied in a Spanish population of all ages (10–85 years) and different social groups, by using an 88-item online questionnaire, with a total of 2013 respondents. Participants reported on the instrumental and emotional supports they receive, and on a set of psychosocial variables (emotion management, motivation, self-efficacy, social and communication skills, and social support), as well as their sociodemographic data; all of which were considered as contributions to a sustainable world. Instrumental and emotional supports for sustainability were significantly less prevalent among older participants, men, people with low educational levels, low autonomy levels, retired individuals, and those with a low-income level. Older and female participants were able to manage their own and other peoples’ emotions significantly more frequently. Participant motivation was less prevalent among the participants with low autonomy levels and low-income levels. Younger participants with low autonomy levels were significantly less able to perform activities related to their self-efficacy. Extreme age groups, those with higher educational levels, singles, and those living alone, reported feeling lonely more often. These results help identify sociocultural characteristics of adults with low social participation, which is critical for developing useful strategies to promote community engagement and related benefits for older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez, 2022. "Exploring the Instrumental and Emotional Supports for Sustainability and Social Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10377-:d:893327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiangang Shi & Wenwen Hua & Daizhong Tang & Fang Liu, 2022. "Sustainable Community Transformation and Community Integration of Agricultural Transfer Population—A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Aurélie Halsband, 2022. "Sustainable AI and Intergenerational Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Chao-Ming Wang & Cheng-Hao Shao & Cheng-En Han, 2022. "Construction of a Tangible VR-Based Interactive System for Intergenerational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-41, May.
    4. Ella Schwartz & Liat Ayalon & Oliver Huxhold & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Exploring the Reciprocal Associations of Perceptions of Aging and Social Involvement [The relation between age and three-dimensional wisdom: Variations by wisdom dimensions and education]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(3), pages 563-573.
    5. Carin Lennartsson & Merril Silverstein, 2001. "Does Engagement With Life Enhance Survival of Elderly People in Sweden? The Role of Social and Leisure Activities," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(6), pages 335-342.
    6. Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez & Cristina Díaz-Prieto & Deilis-Ivonne Pacheco-Sanz, 2021. "Evaluation of the Benefits, Satisfaction, and Limitations of Intergenerational Face-to-Face Activities: A General Population Survey in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Donna Dosman & Janet Fast & Sherry Chapman & Norah Keating, 2006. "Retirement and Productive Activity in Later Life," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 401-419, September.
    8. Lin Cai & Yating Xu & Kaiqi Zhang & Caiya Zhang & Zhengzhe Xiang, 2022. "A New Measurement of Global Equity in a Sustainability Perspective: Examining Differences from Space and Time Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Anqi Yu & Guankun Liu & Yuning Gao, 2022. "Intergenerational Occupational Mobility, Labor Migration and Sustained Demographic Dividends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez & Deilis-Ivonne Pacheco-Sanz, 2021. "Benefits, Satisfaction and Limitations Derived from the Performance of Intergenerational Virtual Activities: Data from a General Population Spanish Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & M. Dolores Botella-Carrubi & Tomas F. Gonzalez-Cruz, 2018. "Social Capital, Human Capital, and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Jelena S Siebert & Hans-Werner Wahl & Johannes Schröder, 2018. "The Role of Attitude Toward Own Aging for Fluid and Crystallized Functioning: 12-Year Evidence From the ILSE Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 836-845.
    13. Maja Rožman & Polona Tominc & Katja Crnogaj, 2022. "Healthy and Entrepreneurial Work Environment for Older Employees and Its Impact on Work Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Cadeyrn J. Gaskin & Liliana Orellana, 2018. "Factors Associated with Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults from Six Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Lindsey Baker & Lawrence Cahalin & Kerstin Gerst & Jeffrey Burr, 2005. "Productive Activities And Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults: The Influence Of Number Of Activities And Time Commitment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 431-458, September.
    16. Jeffrey A. Burr & Jan E. Mutchler & Francis G. Caro, 2007. "Productive Activity Clusters Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Intersecting Forms and Time Commitments," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(4), pages 267-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huiying Liu & Wei Qun Lou, 2016. "Patterns of productive activity engagement among older adults in urban China," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 361-372, December.
    2. Kattika Thanakwang & Sang‐arun Isaramalai, 2013. "Productive engagement in older adults: A concept analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 124-130, March.
    3. José Álvarez-García & Amador Durán-Sánchez & María de la Cruz Del Río-Rama & Diego Fernando García-Vélez, 2018. "Active Ageing: Mapping of Scientific Coverage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Chiao, Chi, 2019. "Beyond health care: Volunteer work, social participation, and late-life general cognitive status in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 154-160.
    5. Yungsoo Lee, 2021. "Activity Profiles among Older Adults: Latent Class Analysis Using the Korean Time Use Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Thomas Akintayo & Niina Häkälä & Katja Ropponen & Elsa Paronen & Sari Rissanen, 2016. "Predictive Factors for Voluntary and/or Paid Work among Adults in their Sixties," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1387-1404, September.
    7. Kimiko Tomioka & Norio Kurumatani & Keigo Saeki, 2018. "The differential effects of type and frequency of social participation on IADL declines of older people," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Omer Sagie, 2016. "Well-Being in Older Gays and Lesbians: A Comparison of Predictors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 395-409, March.
    9. Hu, Shu & Das, Dhiman, 2019. "Quality of life among older adults in China and India: Does productive engagement help?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 144-153.
    10. Teerawichitchainan, Bussarawan & Prachuabmoh, Vipan & Knodel, John, 2019. "Productive aging in developing Southeast Asia: Comparative analyses between Myanmar, Vietnam and Thailand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 161-171.
    11. Elizabeth Lehman & Ruth Jepson & John McAteer & Daryll Archibald, 2020. "What Motivates Volunteers to Engage in Health-Related Citizen Science Initiatives? A Case Study of Our Outdoors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Matthew D Rablen, 2012. "The promotion of local wellbeing: A primer for policymakers," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(3), pages 297-314, May.
    13. Wang, Shuhong & Li, Shengxiao (Alex) & Hu, Wanyang, 2022. "Grandparenting and subjective well-being in China: The moderating effects of residential location, gender, age, and income," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    14. Aimee van Wynsberghe & Tijs Vandemeulebroucke & Larissa Bolte & Jamila Nachid, 2022. "Special Issue “Towards the Sustainability of AI; Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Investigate the Hidden Costs of AI”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-4, December.
    15. Diasakos, Theodoros M & Neymotin, Florence, 2013. "Coordination in Public Good Provision: How Individual Volunteering is Impacted by the Volunteering of Others," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-119, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    16. Dury, Sarah & Stas, Lara & Switsers, Lise & Duppen, Daan & Domènech-Abella, Joan & Dierckx, Eva & Donder, Liesbeth De, 2021. "Gender-related differences in the relationship between social and activity participation and health and subjective well-being in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Meng Lv & Shaohong Feng, 2021. "Temporary teams: current research focus and future directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2018. "Impacts of Leisure and Tourism on the Elderly’s Quality of Life in Intimacy: A Comparative Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Haitham Nobanee & Fatima Youssef Al Hamadi & Fatma Ali Abdulaziz & Lina Subhi Abukarsh & Aysha Falah Alqahtani & Shayma Khalifa AlSubaey & Sara Mohamed Alqahtani & Hamama Abdulla Almansoori, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability and Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10377-:d:893327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.