IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7809-d848731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergizing Microbial Enriched Municipal Solid Waste Compost and Mineral Gypsum for Optimizing Rice-Wheat Productivity in Sodic Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Yash P. Singh

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow 226002, India)

  • Sanjay Arora

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow 226002, India)

  • Vinay K. Mishra

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow 226002, India)

  • Atul K. Singh

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow 226002, India)

Abstract

Municipal solid waste management and poor fertility status of sodic soils are two important issues experienced by all developing nations including India. Disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) being produced in huge amounts is a challenging task for researchers and policy makers. Reclamation of salt affected soils with chemical amendments is a costly affair for resource-poor farmers. Composting of MSW and its enrichment with microbes is one of the options for its recycling and utilization for the reclamation of salt-affected soils. A field experiment was conducted in sodic soil to study the performance of microbial enriched municipal solid waste compost (EMSWC) alone and in combination with a reduced dose of gypsum on growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and grain quality of rice and wheat. The experiment was conducted for three consecutive years from 2018 to 2019 and 2020 to 2021 at ICAR Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Research farm, Shivri, Lucknow, India, in sodic soil having pH 9.2, electrical conductivity (EC) 1.14 dSm −1 , exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) 48, and organic carbon 0.30%. There were six treatments consisting of control, recommended dose of gypsum (50% GR), and enriched and un-enriched MSW compost with reduced dose of gypsum (25% GR). Based on the results pertaining to plant growth, yield-attributing characters, and yields, the treatment T 6 (application of microbial enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha −1 in conjunction with gypsum @25% GR) performed the best. Grain yield of rice and wheat (5.45 and 3.92 t ha −1 ) with treatment T 6 was 29.45% and 110.75% higher over control (T 1 ) and 29.45% and 110.06% over the recommended dose of gypsum (T 2 ). Maximum nutrient content and N, P, and K uptake in rice-wheat grain and straw was observed with the treatment T 6 (MSW compost plus gypsum @ 25 GR). However, the highest Na content and Na: K ratio in plant parts were recorded in treatment T 2 . The highest positive net return and benefit to cost (B/C) ratio were observed in treatment T 6 followed by T 5 and the lowest in treatment T 1 (control), whereas negative return was calculated in treatment of gypsum alone (T 2 ). This shows that the cost of sodic soil reclamation with application of gypsum was not recovered until the second year of cultivation. The results of this study showed significant impacts in MSW management for regaining the productivity potential of sodic soils.

Suggested Citation

  • Yash P. Singh & Sanjay Arora & Vinay K. Mishra & Atul K. Singh, 2022. "Synergizing Microbial Enriched Municipal Solid Waste Compost and Mineral Gypsum for Optimizing Rice-Wheat Productivity in Sodic Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7809-:d:848731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhakal, Chandra & Lange, Kelly & Parajulee, Megha N. & Segarra, Eduardo, 2019. "Dynamic Optimization of Nitrogen in Plateau Cotton Yield Functions with Nitrogen Carryover Considerations," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 385-401, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liuder Isidoro Rodríguez Coca & Marcos Tulio García González & Zuleiqui Gil Unday & Janet Jiménez Hernández & Marcia María Rodríguez Jáuregui & Yander Fernández Cancio, 2023. "Effects of Sodium Salinity on Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) Cultivation: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    2. Sihvonen, Matti & Pihlainen, Sampo & Lai, Tin-Yu & Salo, Tapio & Hyytiäinen, Kari, 2021. "Crop production, water pollution, or climate change mitigation—Which drives socially optimal fertilization management most?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Khalid Hussain & Ayesha Ilyas & Saqib Ali & Irshad Bibi & Qamar Shakil & Muhammad Usman Farid & Zulfiqar Ahmad Saqib & Adnan Habib & Erdoğan Eşref HAKKI, 2022. "Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application and Mulching on the Morpho-Physiological and Yield-Related Traits in Cotton," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Sarkar, Sampriti & Lupi, Frank, 2022. "Modelling mid-western corn yield response to phosphorus fertilizer in Michigan," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322478, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7809-:d:848731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.